What's new

Gandhi said Palestine belongs to the Arabs

MultaniGuy

BANNED
Joined
Feb 6, 2017
Messages
12,243
Reaction score
-6
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
Netanyahu in India: What was swept under the carpet
by Vijay Prashad
8 hours ago

309161c8dcce49d0935e73d3c6fc1ebe_18.jpg

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu writes a message in the visitor's book at Gandhi Ashram in Ahmedabad, India on January 17 [Reuters/Amit Dave]
MORE ON BENJAMIN NETANYAHU
If you believed that the Indian people universally welcomed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to India, then you were misled. The corporate media - both in Indiaand in Israel - concentrated on the press releases from the offices of the prime ministers and bought hook, line and sinker into their well-orchestrated propaganda.

There were the typical visits: to the Taj Mahal, to Gandhi's Sabarmati Ashram and to Gandhi's samadhi (memorial). There was the opening of a technology centre and there was the meeting with business leaders.

Yet the media not only did not cover the true purpose of Netanyahu's visit, it also ignored Indians who protested against it and called for solidarity with Palestine.

The arms deals
Amid all the pomp and ceremony, what the media failed to discuss were the arms deals that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Netanyahu discussed. India is a major buyer of Israeli weapons; between 2012 and 2016, the country bought 41 percent of Israeli arms exports.

The meetings of "business leaders" which were mentioned in the media included weapons manufacturers and weapons contractors - merchants of war - who, in their blue suits and silk ties, pretended that their business is business and not war. What was discussed at these meetings was quite important.

READ MORE
India's Modi gives warm welcome to Israel's Netanyahu
In April 2017, India and Israel signed a deal for military equipment worth $2bn. But on January 2 this year, the Indian government informed the Israeli arms companies that it would no longer be honoring the $500m contract to buy the Spike anti-tank missiles. During Netanyahu's visit, however, he pointedly said that the deal was back on the table. Apparently, Modi had personally told Netanyahu to disregard the January 2 notice.

To do so, Modi had to go against the Indian state-owned military company Defense Research and Development Organization, which was acting in line with the Indian government's "Make in India" industrial policy. Rather than make anti-tank missiles at home, India will have to pay up to import Israeli technology.

Weapons are at the heart of the relationship between India and Israel. All else is secondary. It would, however, have been too crude to emphasise the weapons deals. Modi and Netanyahu are both showmen. They understand the art of propaganda. To reduce their relationship to brokering for arms deals would not do. They want to be seen as high-minded men who are bringing their countries together for a higher purpose.

Gandhi and Palestine
Mahatma Gandhi has been long used to being misused in India. A man who eschewed money and detested the profit motive of capitalism is honoured on each of India's currency notes.

In 1931, when Gandhi was asked about military force, he told a reporter that he hoped a future India would have "the smallest army imaginable". India has, currently the second largest standing army in the world (after China, with the United States in third place). India, which spends $56bn a year on its military, is fifth on the list of countries by military expenditure ( after the United States, China, Russia and Saudi Arabia). It is by far the world's largest importer of weapons (followed by Saudi Arabia).

Modi and his government said nothing about Gandhi's views on the Palestinians during this visit. After all, they would have come in the way of the arms deals.


That Modi took Netanyahu to Gandhi's main ashram on the Sabarmati River, near Ahmedabad and that he took to to his samadhi at Raj Ghat (where he was cremated) is an insult to India's late anti-colonial leader. This was a outrageous decision not only because these men had essentially come together to cement an arms deal, but because of Gandhi's views on the Palestinians - a people forgotten by the corporate media during Netanyahu's propaganda trip.

In 1938, Gandhi wrote, "Palestine belongs to the Arabs […] It is wrong and inhumane to impose the Jews on the Arabs". He was writing as a man involved in an anti-colonial struggle. In his view, Europe couldn't just expel Palestinians from their land and driven by its own history of anti-Semitism settle the European Jewish population there.

In 1946, two years before the formation of Israel, Gandhi wrote: "Why should [Jews] depend upon American money or British arms for forcing themselves on an unwelcome land? Why should they resort to terrorism to make good their forcible landing in Palestine?" He had in mind groups like the Haganah and Irgun, which used violence against the British and the Palestinians as a prelude to the forcible expulsion of the Palestinians from their land during the 1948 Nakba (catastrophe).

Modi and his government said nothing about Gandhi's views on the Palestinians during this visit. After all, they would have come in the way of the arms deals.

The protests
Protests took place across the country against the visit of Netanyahu. In New Delhi, the communist movement and pro-Palestinian groups led the way with a mass rally.

Prakash Karat, a leader of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), said that by inviting Netanyahu, the Modi government "gives legitimacy to the occupation of Palestine by Israel". He pointed out that even when US President Donald Trump visited Israel, he went to the West Bank. When Modi went to Israel last summer, he ignored Palestine. The lack of any mention of Palestine during this trip is part of a policy to erase Palestine from the Indian political consciousness.

Netanyahu went to Mumbai, where he met some high-profile actors and producers of Bollywood. During the meeting, an expected selfie with the Israeli PM was staged, featuring actors Amitabh Bachchan, Abishek Bachchan, Aishwarya Rai, and Vivek Oberoi and producers Raj Nayak and Ronnie Screwvala. All were grinning for the camera, unapologetic about being photographed with a man being investigated for corruption in Israel and on his way of being placed on the war crimes list by the International Criminal Court.

But not all in India's film industry welcomed the visit. Anand Patwardhan, the award-winning documentary filmmaker, decided to go for a demonstration against Modi rather than be part of the charade. When I asked about his protest, Patwardhan summed it up quite well: "In all probability some of the big names in Bollywood will join the Modi-Netanyahu hit parade in jettisoning the cause of Palestine. What you should know is that this will be an unholy alliance made up of ruthless, militarist majoritarians on the one hand and film bigwigs who store their enormous illegal wealth in tax havens like Panama. To expect their ilk to worry about justice for the dispossessed is asking for too much."

The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.

WITNESS

Aamir Khan: The Snake Charmer


ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Vijay Prashad

Vijay Prashad is the Chief Editor of LeftWord Books.

@ vijayprashad

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/netanyahu-india-swept-carpet-180120161503967.html
 
.
India sees the Palestine issue as a vestige of (British) colonialism. Suits in some far off land can't make decisions for locals.
This stand stays to this day.

Arabs made the mistake of fingering Israel without going for a realistic solution. This has made Israel an unavoidable power and so India bats to both sides remarkably well.

"India-Israel Brotherhood" is made up by some right wing idiots who became jealous of the equally stupid Muslim Ummah concept.
Both doesn't really exist. Only self-interests do.
 
.
India sees the Palestine issue as a vestige of (British) colonialism. Suits in some far off land can't make decisions for locals.
This stand stays to this day.

Arabs made the mistake of fingering Israel without going for a realistic solution. This has made Israel an unavoidable power and so India bats to both sides remarkably well.

Again, India still value the life and oridinary people of Palestine that is why we did not support US move...But if some one expect that Indian will abandon Israel just because Gandhi has said it, then it is not going to happen...Gandhiji and thier legacy congress messed up so much that we are still in process of stabilizing to ourselves....
 
.
Again, India still value the life and oridinary people of Palestine that is why we did not support US move...But if some one expect that Indian will abandon Israel just because Gandhi has said it, then it is not going to happen...Gandhiji and thier legacy congress messed up so much that we are still in process of stabilizing to ourselves....
Israel is a friend. There's no reason to abandon friends.
I'm not a fan of Gandhi, but he wanted to dismantle INC after independence.
I'm not a fan of INC, but I think they've done a lot of good things and bad things like any other govt.
 
.
Again, India still value the life and oridinary people of Palestine that is why we did not support US move...But if some one expect that Indian will abandon Israel just because Gandhi has said it, then it is not going to happen...Gandhiji and thier legacy congress messed up so much that we are still in process of stabilizing to ourselves....
You make some sensible posts.

Yes but Gandhi was alive during the partition plan for Palestine so Gandhi's opinion against Israel can be taken seriously.

Gandhi said Palestine belongs to the Arabs. The Zionists are occupiers of Palestinian land.
 
.
You make some sensible posts.

Yes but Gandhi was alive during the partition plan for Palestine so Gandhi's opinion against Israel can be taken seriously.

Gandhi said Palestine belongs to the Arabs. The Zionists are occupiers of Palestinian land.
Gandhi was right to say it at that time when the atrocities and wars were happening. It was the formative years of Israel by our enemy, the White man.
But times change and right now Gandhi wouldn't have said the exact words.
He'd have asked for the two state solution.
 
.
Let the old man rest in peace .... Not even congress cares what exactly he wanted.

Lol @ "award winning documentary filmmaker" Anand Patwardhan protested from bollywood.
 
.
Gandhi was right to say it at that time when the atrocities and wars were happening. It was the formative years of Israel by our enemy, the White man.
But times change and right now Gandhi wouldn't have said the exact words.
He'd have asked for the two state solution.
How do you know Gandhi would have changed his opinion now? Gandhi is now dead, nobody knows his 21st century opinion on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
 
.
How do you know Gandhi would have changed his opinion now? Gandhi is now dead, nobody knows his 21st century opinion on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
Gandhi always asks for peace and ahimsa, but in a practical way.
I don't really like his ideology of peace every time, but he'd have asked for the most peaceful solution, which is two state with divided Jerusalem.

It's a different thing to call out the wickedness of the West when Israel was being formed. There was still hope for peace in many ways.
Now there's not.

He might still keep in his mind that Palestinians got screwed over, which we all do. But that doesn't deter me, nor would it deter Gandhi from asking for two state.
 
.
Gandhi always asks for peace and ahimsa, but in a practical way.
I don't really like his ideology of peace every time, but he'd have asked for the most peaceful solution, which is two state with divided Jerusalem.

It's a different thing to call out the wickedness of the West when Israel was being formed. There was still hope for peace in many ways.
Now there's not.

He might still keep in his mind that Palestinians got screwed over, which we all do. But that doesn't deter me, or would it deter Gandhi from asking for two state.

I do agree that the two state solution should solve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
 
.
India is looking for her own interests and no one can blame them , they owe nothing to Arabs or Muslims
 
.
Gandhi was right to say it at that time when the atrocities and wars were happening. It was the formative years of Israel by our enemy, the White man.
But times change and right now Gandhi wouldn't have said the exact words.
He'd have asked for the two state solution.
are you saying gandhi was a hypocrite
 
.
He said many things...

Today his words or Opinions have no value for India's geopolitical interests and ambitions...

Vedic | ब्राह्मण
 
.
I do agree that the two state solution should solve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
which apparently even the arab leaders dont want now..though they want to wait till there people can digest it..i bet 10-15 years would be enough..
its more than 40 years since west bank is occupied..
two state is no longer even physically possible with all those settlements..
most people want a two state but Israel will never agree to it and when it agrees to it there would not be enough Palestinians left in west bank due to force migration, subjugation and settlements...
do you think all those settlements are temporary????

israel-Palestine issue is no longer complicated since Palestine and Arabs have accepted now both the 1945 and all occupation till 1967 war..
the only complication is that Israel doesnt want a two state solution and it has change the ground realities alot...

in end its moving either towards a bloody war or more likely a full israeli settlement
they have done it in the past and there is no reason why they cant do it now
 
.
are you saying gandhi was a hypocrite

Gandhi and his vision was good when India and Pakistan are like 2 brother countries..At the time of independence..But this is 2017...Things are changed so does the relevancy of Gandhiji and his advice in 2017...
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom