Gaming the Pakistani mind after its first responses to Indian moves in Kashmir

[TOPGUN]

It depends on what success means. For Modi, the attack on Balakot was not only popular in India but it helped them sweep the elections over Congress. That was the main goal of the attack, not to impress Pakistan or anyone else with India's military prowess (or the lack thereof).

Right, balakot was actually a lot more popular in Pakistan and in the world then in india which actually results of 2 fighters down and your ace pilot taken in to custody and then we showed the world what really went down lmao.

 

[cloud4000]

Here you are 7x bigger than Pakistan and having the backing of the West and Russia yet you are still FAR too weak, powerless and incapable of fighting the Pakistan Army and taking back Azad Kashmir.......

So oppressing people within your own territory is a victory for you against a 7× smaller foe????????............wtf!!!!!!!....................it means you are acknowledging the inferiority of the hyper-ugly sub-human indian race.......

Forget what the Sanghis say about Akhand Bharat. There's no desire by India to acquire "Azad Kashmir." Pakistan can keep their part of Kashmir. India is content with the part it controls.

Remember these words, you will have your answer

How many times India has been told this I have lost count.

Here you are 5 times of Pakistan , yet your foreign office is begging for diplomatic relation.

Recognize this coward??

Yes, I recognize him. He's a brave Indian pilot shot down in the line of duty.

Right, balakot was actually a lot more popular in Pakistan and in the world then in india which actually results of 2 fighters down and your ace pilot taken in to custody and then we showed the world what really went down lmao.

If you haven't realized yet...the world didn't care and neither did anyone in India.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Forget what the Sanghis say about Akhand Bharat. There's no desire by India to acquire "Azad Kashmir." Pakistan can keep their part of Kashmir. India is content with the part it controls.



How many times India has been told this I have lost count.



Yes, I recognize him. He's a brave Indian pilot shot down in the line of duty.



If you haven't realized yet...the world didn't care and neither did anyone in India.

All indians are sanghis..........

 

[Chakar The Great]

Forget what the Sanghis say about Akhand Bharat. There's no desire by India to acquire "Azad Kashmir." Pakistan can keep their part of Kashmir. India is content with the part it controls.

The difference is its not about land, Pakistan is concerned with people. Thats the major difference between stance of two countries.

Yes, I recognize him. He's a brave Indian pilot shot down in the line of duty.

Well Indians certainly have low standards of bravery, and its not hard to understand as they have been ruled by Muslims and Brits for over 1000 years, they have slave mentality where even shouting is counted as bravery. He failed mission, he was captured alive, a brave soldier would have fought rather than surrender. In Modi;s india there is no place for truth.

 

[delta2]

President Trump doesn't like people who get caught!

 

[Pakhtoon yum]

The joke is on you if you thought Balakot was about you. It wasn't.

@waz another stinky idiot

 

[waz]

 

[cloud4000]

Well Indians certainly have low standards of bravery, and its not hard to understand as they have been ruled by Muslims and Brits for over 1000 years, they have slave mentality where even shouting is counted as bravery. He failed mission, he was captured alive, a brave soldier would have fought rather than surrender. In Modi;s india there is no place for truth.

You talk like Pakistanis never lost before. What happened in Dhaka in 1971 when Pakistani troops surrendered to Indians? Were those Pakistani cowards too? You have no idea what you are talking about.

Please refrain from talking about "slave mentality". Remember, Muslims were under British rule as well. Nevertheless, the Mughals are gone and the British are gone. It's ancient history.

 

[xyxmt]

It depends on what success means. For Modi, the attack on Balakot was not only popular in India but it helped them sweep the elections over Congress. That was the main goal of the attack, not to impress Pakistan or anyone else with India's military prowess (or the lack thereof).

What do you say about those who celebrate their defeat and reward leaders who earned them a defeat, I don't think Websters have any word for it

 

[delta2]

You talk like Pakistanis never lost before. What happened in Dhaka in 1971 when Pakistani troops surrendered to Indians? Were those Pakistani cowards too? You have no idea what you are talking about.

Please refrain from talking about "slave mentality". Remember, Muslims were under British rule as well. Nevertheless, the Mughals are gone and the British are gone. It's ancient history.

Slave mentality refers to the caste system which is deeply embedded in the Indian society, psyche and mind. Pakistanis tend to have higher IQs and can grasp the context, but for Indians like you I have to explain each time what is meant when someone uses the term "slave mentality".

1971 was a USSR achievement. Dhaka was very well defended but the order was given to surrender. India dined like a vulture that it is and nothing more.

Cowards don't go up against an enemy seven times their size while outnumbered and outgunned and still manage to wipe the floor with their air force.

Pakistan got its revenge in the Soviet-Afghan war. Now have some patience and wait till the USA leaves, everything will become clear to you.

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

As for "gaming" the mindset of the Mushrikin, every Harf of the KITAP is a means depending on the level of Iman, Ihlas, Yakin, Ihsan etc. of course!!! Haven't Muhammed bin Kasim, Aybek, Ghori, EbdAli, Jinnah, MM Alam etc. physically demonstrated it already???

By the by, another SU-30 is down 1K miles away from the Pak border....

Slave mentality refers to the caste system which is deeply embedded in the Indian society, psyche and mind. Pakistanis tend to have higher IQs and can grasp the context, but for Indians like you I have to explain each time what is meant when someone uses the term "slave mentality".

1971 was a USSR achievement. Dhaka was very well defended but the order was given to surrender. India dined like a vulture that it is and nothing more.

Cowards don't go up against an enemy seven times their size while outnumbered and outgunned and still manage to wipe the floor with their air force.

Pakistan got its revenge in the Soviet-Afghan war. Now have some patience and wait till the USA leaves, everything will become clear to you.

Don't forget Mujib, Mukti Bahini etc.!!!!

 

[Kabira]

Remember guys this is their left wing now lmao

And pashtuns are about to join PTM I just wish this "left wing" compared pashtuns in Pakistan with Indian muslims, both are about same % of each other countries.

 

[rishav]

You talk like Pakistanis never lost before. What happened in Dhaka in 1971 when Pakistani troops surrendered to Indians? Were those Pakistani cowards too? You have no idea what you are talking about.

Please refrain from talking about "slave mentality". Remember, Muslims were under British rule as well. Nevertheless, the Mughals are gone and the British are gone. It's ancient history.

Kyu thak re ho ? just sit back and observe/enjoy

 

[The Eagle]

What a waste of time & space.