What's new

Funding for desi aircraft carrier tops CCS agenda

Indo-guy

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
4,820
Reaction score
2
Country
India
Location
Singapore
Funding for desi aircraft carrier tops CCS agenda - The Times of India


NEW DELHI: India's mission to build its own aircraft carrier has virtually come to a grinding halt, with the defence establishment awaiting allocation of fresh funds to finish the 40,000-tonne warship's construction at Cochin Shipyard.

The approval for the around Rs 19,000 crore Phase-II and III construction of the long-delayed indigenous aircraft carrier (IAC), to be christened INS Vikrant, figures among the top agenda items for the new Modi government's Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS), say sources.

The UPA regime's CCS, in fact, was to take up the case earlier this year, after clearance from the defence and finance ministries, but the final nod failed to materialize. "So, fresh approvals from MoD and MoF are being obtained to take it to the CCS again," said a source.

The fund allocation, when it happens, will not come a day too soon. With around 75% of IAC's basic structure now erected, the Navy hopes to get the carrier by 2018-2019 to fulfill its long-standing aim of operating two full-fledged carrier-battle groups (CBGs).

While India does have two carriers now, 44,570-tonne INS Vikramaditya and 28,000-tonne INS Viraat, the latter is 55 years old. Moreover, it's left with just 11 Sea Harrier jump-jets to operate from its deck.



INS Vikramaditya, or Admiral Gorshkov acquired from Russia after a $2.33 billion refit, was recently declared "fully-operational" by Navy chief Admiral Robin Dhowan. The 45 MiG-29K naval fighters, being procured from Russia for over $2 billion, will operate both from INS Vikramaditya and INS Vikrant.

While it is certainly not easy to construct aircraft carriers, with only the US, Russia, UK and France having built such large warships till now, the IAC has had a tortuous past. After several years of discussions, the government in January 2003 finally sanctioned the design and construction of the IAC, which will take its name from the first carrier acquired from the UK in 1961 and later decommissioned in 1997.

Of the estimated construction cost of Rs 20,000 crore, around Rs 3,500 crore have been spent so far to complete the IAC's hull and deck, signifying the underwater work and machinery fitting in the warship is over. Now, the superstructure, the upper decks, the cabling, sensors and weapons have to be integrated.

Prowling on the high seas as mobile airbases, aircraft carriers are considered the final word in projecting hard combat power. The US, for instance, has 11 nuclear-powered Nimitz-class "super-carriers'', each over 94,000 tonnes and capable of carrying 80-90 fighters. China, too, is now looking at nuclear-powered carriers after inducting its first conventional carrier, the 65,000-tonne Liaoning, in September 2012.
 
They spent all the money given to them in the last fiscal year, which is unheard of considering they give money back to the government every year because they couldn't spend it.
 
I had a query regards the propulsion planned for the the IAC-2. While reading, I noticed that the EMALS, which the IN had a demo of, seems to require more power than the produced by the powerplants in the Nimitz class. And its only the Ford class which has the required power to use this. If so, what will be the propulsion system of INS Vishal?

Also, read in another post "Financial sanction has been just accorded for BARC to develop a 190mW LWR by upscaling the 83mW LWR. This 190mW LWR will also be offered for installation on the projected IAC-2" Could this be confirmation that we are going for EMALS?

@Penguin @Capt.Popeye @sancho @Dillinger @Manticore
 
How come we are having shortage of funds suddenly for every project??
 
How come we are having shortage of funds suddenly for every project??
Towards the end of last year the MoD sanctioned the Military to take around $2-3 BN from the Cap Ex budget and put it into the day to day expenses account. Additionally inflation and the low year on year increase (i believe it was only around 2% in real terms for the FY2013-14 as compared to the FY2012-13) meant that there was a much larger drain on capital expenditure but no real increase in the budget- 2013-14 saw the lowest level of defence spending by India in more than 5 decades at around 1.78% of GDP.
 
So if our currency value increases then it'll be beneficial for indigenous projects right?

Towards the end of last year the MoD sanctioned the Military to take around $2-3 BN from the Cap Ex budget and put it into the day to day expenses account. Additionally inflation and the low year on year increase (i believe it was only around 2% in real terms for the FY2013-14 as compared to the FY2012-13) meant that there was a much larger drain on capital expenditure but no real increase in the budget- 2013-14 saw the lowest level of defence spending by India in more than 5 decades at around 1.78% of GDP.
 
I had a query regards the propulsion planned for the the IAC-2. While reading, I noticed that the EMALS, which the IN had a demo of, seems to require more power than the produced by the powerplants in the Nimitz class. And its only the Ford class which has the required power to use this. If so, what will be the propulsion system of INS Vishal?

Also, read in another post "Financial sanction has been just accorded for BARC to develop a 190mW LWR by upscaling the 83mW LWR. This 190mW LWR will also be offered for installation on the projected IAC-2" Could this be confirmation that we are going for EMALS?

@Penguin @Capt.Popeye @sancho @Dillinger @Manticore
Emals on list...but no confirmation. Still Barc is working on reactor.
 
Back
Top Bottom