What's new

French magazine justifies Uighur terrorist attacks on Chinese civilians

Everyone in the world know you got beef with Pakistan so all your constant rant about terrorism is just a political maneuver

Exactly. Indians trying to use terrorism in their political rivalry with Pakistan. China knew what the real agenda of India was. It's nothing to do with fighting terrorism.
 
.
anti-pakistan ? the resolution was not against Pakistan it was against a member of a banned terrorist organisation who was involved in the death of more than 180 people.
They help us during floods and earthquakes so its cool
 
.
if you can't see the difference,then you don't have any grounds yo complain about double standards of the west.

You may consider yourself a politician by attempting to weave a web of lies and deceit, to justify your point of view, but not all political forces are aligned with you and thus do see past your attempts.
 
.
abe Chu, what has banning a terrorist organization got to do with our beef with Pakistan? Does that mean China supports terrorists where one country has been with another? In that case any country china has beef with, and that's plenty of neighbors and more, should also support terrorists in China?

As I said earlier, you guys have no moral compass whatsoever. No principled stand on ANYTHING, just your ultra nationalistic bullsh1t.
As I have said before, your rant has nothing to do with terrorism but more to paint Pakistan as a terrorist sponsor state because your beef. The international communities all know about this. LOL
 
.
As I have said before, your rant has nothing to do with terrorism but more to paint Pakistan as a terrorist sponsor state because your beef. The international communities all know about this. LOL

The international community banned JUD in UNSC. Previously it was only you Chinese hypocrites who blocked it using your veto.

You are not only misinformed, you are a terrorism supporter and a hypocrite of the first order.
 
.
well for french any non european race is a 3rd class citizen
 
. .
The international community banned JUD in UNSC. Previously it was only you Chinese hypocrites who blocked it using your veto.

You are not only misinformed, you are a terrorism supporter and a hypocrite of the first order.

All of this despite the fact LET attackers wished to slaughter Chinese during the 2008 Mumbai attacks.

At the Oberoi at 0353 hrs on November 27, a handler phones and says:

“Brother Abdul. The media is comparing your action to 9/11. One senior police official has been killed.”

Abdul Rehman: “We are on the10th/11th floor. We have five hostages.”

Caller 2 (Kafa): Everything is being recorded by the media. Inflict the maximum damage. Keep fighting. Don’t be taken alive.

Caller: Kill all hostages, except the two Muslims. Keep your phone switched on so that we can hear the gunfire.

Fahadullah: We have three foreigners, including women. From Singapore and China.

Caller: Kill them. The dossier then notes that the telephone intercept records the “voices of Fahadullah and Abdul Rehman directing hostages to stand in a line, and telling two Muslims to stand aside. Sound of gunfire. Cheering voices in background. Kafa hands telephone to Zarar,” who says, “Fahad, find the way to go downstairs.”

Dossier: handlers used virtual number to contact a mobile with one of the terrorists - Today's Paper - The Hindu

Also interestingly we have no Chinese media interviewing its surviving Chinese citizen unlike British , American or Singaporean media. Its makes obvious sense Chinese Govt would want to downplay this fact given desperate Chinese support for these terrorists groups at UN

For the Chinese Govt guess stratergy to fight Indians to last Pakistani comes ahead of few lives of Chinese citzens
 
.
By that definition the whole Indian Military must be declared a terrorist organization and banned under UN charters, and why stop there why not ban the whole of India for supporting the terrorism of Indian Military in Kashmir, Assam and many other regions within India.
what are you trying to say.

They help us during floods and earthquakes so its cool
good, then I wish each and every Pakistani youth be s member of this group and you have these type of organisations in each and every street if Pakistan
 
.
So if APS attckers ran a shelter during floods, should we all support them?

You people are truly shameless.
Thats the difference they dont but jud does
JuD on front line of earthquake aid - The Express Tribune
PKKH.tv Archives VIDEO: Hafiz Saeed Distributing Eid Gifts in Muzaffargarh » PKKH.tv Archives

what are you trying to say.


good, then I wish each and every Pakistani youth be s member of this group and you have these type of organisations in each and every street if Pakistan
Sure why not
Search Twitter - #fifwithrohingyamuslims
 
.
there is no religious or ethnic terrorism in the world but what countries have used against each other .... American used it against Soviets , iran used it , saudis used it indians used it , even pakians have used them against afghans ..... but i am pretty sure that pakians have not used religious terrorism against india ......
 
Last edited:
. .
there is no religious or ethnic terrorism in the world but what countries have used against each other .... American used it against Soviets , iran used it , saudis used it indians used it , even pakians have used them against afghans ..... but i am pretty sure that pakians have not used religious terrorism against india ......

The bottom line is no body wants to fight their own war.
 
.
On Nov 18, the French magazine Le Nouvel Observateur (The New Observer) published an article on its website authored by staff writer Ursula Gauthier, which blamed the Chinese government's policies in the Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region for terrorist attacks in China. That's a typical example of the West's double standard, which is hindering global efforts to fight terrorism, says an editorial in the Chinese edition of Global Times:

Gauthier's article claims that Muslim names are forbidden in Xinjiang and ethnic Uygur government staff must eat in public during Ramadan. However, Such claims are refuted by Uygurs as nothing but lies.

After the terrorist attack in Paris on Nov 13 that claimed at least 132 lives, the Chinese government condemned terrorism and expressed its sympathy for the French people. Many Chinese people also expressed their condolences to the victims. Guathier has noticed these because she includes them in her article, but she does not show any sympathy for the victims of the terrorist attacks in China.

It is shocking that she holds such deeply rooted prejudice against China. For her, it seems that every person should serve her politics.

She forgets that people all over the world have the same right to protect themselves from being killed for no reason. For her, it is evil to kill civilians in France, while it is "understandable" to kill civilians in China. She uses a different yardstick when terrorists kill innocent civilians in China.

In her view, only civilians killed by terrorists in the West deserve sympathy, but not the Chinese civilians who suffer the same fate. How ridiculous and absurd such an attitude is.

Being politically radical has so blinded some Western journalists such as Gauthier that they lose their common sense. They only know Western standards of "human rights". For that political purpose they dare to challenge the basic human norm that the killing of innocent civilians is a crime.

That hurts Chinese people. At a time when Chinese media and Chinese people had condemned the Paris attack and extended their support to the French people, it is offensive for the French magazine to publish such an article.

It is time the French media rethink such an ridiculous and unreasonable attitude. The Chinese people are friendly to the French people, who should have no reason to return evil for good. They should join hands in fighting terrorism.

This is Western fascist media right there.

They are ready to set the discourse for the state they represent.

We must move well past these and work to create our own alternative discourse instead of trying to prove their points wrong.

Sort of what RT and Sputnik do.

The best defense is offense. If they produce one article about Xinjiang, distorting the truth, produce ten article to set the discourse about France gov't being number of Western sponsor of Syrian terrorism.
 
.
This is Western fascist media right there.

They are ready to set the discourse for the state they represent.

We must move well past these and work to create our own alternative discourse instead of trying to prove their points wrong.

Sort of what RT and Sputnik do.

The best defense is offense. If they produce one article about Xinjiang, distorting the truth, produce ten article to set the discourse about France gov't being number of Western sponsor of Syrian terrorism.

I agree 100%.

Problem is CCTV English is one of the biggest pro-Western networks out there, so Western crimes are never challenged by CCTV.

RT, Sputnik, PressTV are the only ones that challenge the Western narrative.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom