What's new

French magazine justifies Uighur terrorist attacks on Chinese civilians

Economic superpower

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 6, 2014
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
-5
Country
China
Location
China
On Nov 18, the French magazine Le Nouvel Observateur (The New Observer) published an article on its website authored by staff writer Ursula Gauthier, which blamed the Chinese government's policies in the Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region for terrorist attacks in China. That's a typical example of the West's double standard, which is hindering global efforts to fight terrorism, says an editorial in the Chinese edition of Global Times:

Gauthier's article claims that Muslim names are forbidden in Xinjiang and ethnic Uygur government staff must eat in public during Ramadan. However, Such claims are refuted by Uygurs as nothing but lies.

After the terrorist attack in Paris on Nov 13 that claimed at least 132 lives, the Chinese government condemned terrorism and expressed its sympathy for the French people. Many Chinese people also expressed their condolences to the victims. Guathier has noticed these because she includes them in her article, but she does not show any sympathy for the victims of the terrorist attacks in China.

It is shocking that she holds such deeply rooted prejudice against China. For her, it seems that every person should serve her politics.

She forgets that people all over the world have the same right to protect themselves from being killed for no reason. For her, it is evil to kill civilians in France, while it is "understandable" to kill civilians in China. She uses a different yardstick when terrorists kill innocent civilians in China.

In her view, only civilians killed by terrorists in the West deserve sympathy, but not the Chinese civilians who suffer the same fate. How ridiculous and absurd such an attitude is.

Being politically radical has so blinded some Western journalists such as Gauthier that they lose their common sense. They only know Western standards of "human rights". For that political purpose they dare to challenge the basic human norm that the killing of innocent civilians is a crime.

That hurts Chinese people. At a time when Chinese media and Chinese people had condemned the Paris attack and extended their support to the French people, it is offensive for the French magazine to publish such an article.

It is time the French media rethink such an ridiculous and unreasonable attitude. The Chinese people are friendly to the French people, who should have no reason to return evil for good. They should join hands in fighting terrorism.
 
. .
China blocked banning the Jamad Ud Dawa in UNSC, a Pakistani terrorist organization, a front fo Lashkar E Taiba, that carried out the Mumbai attacks.

That's an example of double standard, not an article in a private newspaper.

That's not double standard because India is using UNSC for its anti-Pakistan agenda, nothing to do with actually fighting terrorism.
 
.
China blocked banning the Jamad Ud Dawa in UNSC, a Pakistani terrorist organization, a front fo Lashkar E Taiba, that carried out the Mumbai attacks.

That's an example of double standard, not an article in a private newspaper.
India has supported Tamil Tiger before. I hope you have not forgotten that,

ISIS attack on Paris is justify becos of the oppression on Muslim in France. I am just using the same standard applied by the French politician.
 
.
That's not double standard because India is using UNSC for its anti-Pakistan agenda, nothing to do with actually fighting terrorism.
anti-pakistan ? the resolution was not against Pakistan it was against a member of a banned terrorist organisation who was involved in the death of more than 180 people.
 
.
Europeans will be extinct if they couldn't go out from the "human right" trap. They are making the hanging rope for themselves. Even the Paris terrorist attack can't wake them up from their rosy dream. The most ridiculous thing is, they want others to follow their sick ideology. Arrogant clowns.
 
. . .
India has a history of supporting terrorist organisations like the Tamil Tigers.
there are lot of stars in the sky. is as not related to the topic as you post.

the point we are discussing is double standards of the west,and I said China has nothing yo complain if it does the same
 
. . . .
India has supported Tamil Tiger before. I hope you have not forgotten that,

ISIS attack on Paris is justify becos of the oppression on Muslim in France. I am just using the same standard applied by the French politician.
First of all there was a ban on LTTE (Tamil Tigers), not only that our former Prime Minister was also killed by LTTE.
 
.
anti-pakistan ? the resolution was not against Pakistan it was against a member of a banned terrorist organisation who was involved in the death of more than 180 people.

By that definition the whole Indian Military must be declared a terrorist organization and banned under UN charters, and why stop there why not ban the whole of India for supporting the terrorism of Indian Military in Kashmir, Assam and many other regions within India.
 
.
China blocked banning the Jamad Ud Dawa in UNSC, a Pakistani terrorist organization, a front fo Lashkar E Taiba, that carried out the Mumbai attacks.

That's an example of double standard, not an article in a private newspaper.
Everyone in the world know you got beef with Pakistan so all your constant rant about terrorism is just a political maneuver. However what the French did is outright double standard and certainly karma is a bitch. LOL
 
.
Back
Top Bottom