What's new

French and Indian guerilla ambush spelled doom for Braddock’s Army Read mo

David James

BANNED
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
541
Reaction score
0
French and Indian guerilla ambush spelled doom for Braddock’s Army


By Laura Szepesi

Published: Wednesday, June 26, 2013, 12:51 a.m.
Updated 4 hours ago

Editor's note: This weekend, the Connellsville Area Historical Society will celebrate the 10th anniversary of its presentation of Braddock's Crossing. The event highlights Gen. Edward Braddock's crossing of the Youghiogheny River. In recognition of this celebration, today we take a historical look at Braddock's crossing of the Yough.

When British Gen. Edward Braddock and his army of Redcoats and colonials crossed the Youghiogheny River and camped in Connellsville 258 years ago, they had high hopes. Braddock was confident his soldiers possessed the military skills needed to oust the French from Fort Duquesne.

The French and the English both wanted the fort, which was built at the confluence of the Ohio and Monongahela rivers (the site of Pittsburgh's Point State Park). George Washington, as a volunteer scout in the early 1750s, had seen the fort up close and extolled its value. Because of Fort Duquesne's riverside location, whoever held it would have a great advantage, both economically and militarily.

Washington served as an aide to Braddock during the Fort Duquesne campaign. The young Virginian already had combat experience. His successful ambush at Fayette County's Jumonville Glen in May 1754 — and his subsequent defeat at Fort Necessity by the French and their Native American allies that July — had taught Washington a valuable lesson: “Indian-style” guerilla warfare worked.

Braddock wasn't impressed. He had been trained to fight the European way: armies firing directly at each other across an open battlefield.

The Native Americans fought surreptitiously behind trees and rocks — and they taught their allies, whether those allies were French fur trappers or English colonists. Washington had learned this the hard way when his army was humiliated at Fort Necessity.

Washington advised Braddock to fight Indian-style when Braddock outlined the intent to capture Fort Duquesne in 1755. The opinionated English general (whose nickname was “The Bulldog”) contemptuously regarded guerilla warfare as cowardly.

Braddock led his 1755 expedition north from Virginia toward the Ohio River Valley, his soldiers hacking a path through the wilderness as they went. They reached the Youghiogheny River in late June, staying two nights in the fledgling Connellsville area (then known as Stewart's Crossing). Continuing north, they crossed Jacob's Creek near Mt. Pleasant and forded the Monongahela River on July 9 about 10 miles east of Pittsburgh, near today's city of Braddock.

French, Indians get revenge

The French and their Indian allies knew that Braddock's army was on its way to Fort Duquesne. They lay in wait and attacked with a vengeance.

The surprise scattered Braddock's men like rats deserting a sinking ship. One account described the “horrible war whoops” of the Indians. During the ensuing fight — which is called the Battle of the Wilderness or the Battle of the Monongahela — Braddock had four horses shot out from under him.

More than 500 British and colonials perished, compared to a scant 100 French and Indians. Braddock was mortally wounded. His defeated troops slunk southward toward Virginia. They stopped at Great Meadows (near Fort Necessity) to bury Braddock, who died July 13, 1755, four days after the battle.

The soldiers laid the general to rest along the path they had made to Fort Duquesne, covering the grave thoroughly and riding over it so it wouldn't be discovered and desecrated by the French or Indians.

Braddock's remains were removed and reburied in the early 1800s; his grave marker is located along U.S. Route 40 — the National Road — near Farmington. If one local legend is true, Braddock's remains were located by the man who killed him — and it wasn't a Frenchman or an Indian but a Fayette County man named Tom Faucet.

Read more: French and Indian guerilla ambush spelled doom for Braddock's Army | TribLIVE
Follow us: @triblive on Twitter | triblive on Facebook


Read more: French and Indian guerilla ambush spelled doom for Braddock's Army | TribLIVE
Follow us: @triblive on Twitter | triblive on Facebook
 
Epic fail of the year.


French and Indian guerilla ambush spelled doom for Braddock’s Army


By Laura Szepesi

Published: Wednesday, June 26, 2013, 12:51 a.m.
Updated 4 hours ago

Editor's note: This weekend, the Connellsville Area Historical Society will celebrate the 10th anniversary of its presentation of Braddock's Crossing. The event highlights Gen. Edward Braddock's crossing of the Youghiogheny River. In recognition of this celebration, today we take a historical look at Braddock's crossing of the Yough.

When British Gen. Edward Braddock and his army of Redcoats and colonials crossed the Youghiogheny River and camped in Connellsville 258 years ago, they had high hopes. Braddock was confident his soldiers possessed the military skills needed to oust the French from Fort Duquesne.

The French and the English both wanted the fort, which was built at the confluence of the Ohio and Monongahela rivers (the site of Pittsburgh's Point State Park). George Washington, as a volunteer scout in the early 1750s, had seen the fort up close and extolled its value. Because of Fort Duquesne's riverside location, whoever held it would have a great advantage, both economically and militarily.

Washington served as an aide to Braddock during the Fort Duquesne campaign. The young Virginian already had combat experience. His successful ambush at Fayette County's Jumonville Glen in May 1754 — and his subsequent defeat at Fort Necessity by the French and their Native American allies that July — had taught Washington a valuable lesson: “Indian-style” guerilla warfare worked.

Braddock wasn't impressed. He had been trained to fight the European way: armies firing directly at each other across an open battlefield.

The Native Americans fought surreptitiously behind trees and rocks — and they taught their allies, whether those allies were French fur trappers or English colonists. Washington had learned this the hard way when his army was humiliated at Fort Necessity.

Washington advised Braddock to fight Indian-style when Braddock outlined the intent to capture Fort Duquesne in 1755. The opinionated English general (whose nickname was “The Bulldog”) contemptuously regarded guerilla warfare as cowardly.

Braddock led his 1755 expedition north from Virginia toward the Ohio River Valley, his soldiers hacking a path through the wilderness as they went. They reached the Youghiogheny River in late June, staying two nights in the fledgling Connellsville area (then known as Stewart's Crossing). Continuing north, they crossed Jacob's Creek near Mt. Pleasant and forded the Monongahela River on July 9 about 10 miles east of Pittsburgh, near today's city of Braddock.

French, Indians get revenge

The French and their Indian allies knew that Braddock's army was on its way to Fort Duquesne. They lay in wait and attacked with a vengeance.

The surprise scattered Braddock's men like rats deserting a sinking ship. One account described the “horrible war whoops” of the Indians. During the ensuing fight — which is called the Battle of the Wilderness or the Battle of the Monongahela — Braddock had four horses shot out from under him.

More than 500 British and colonials perished, compared to a scant 100 French and Indians. Braddock was mortally wounded. His defeated troops slunk southward toward Virginia. They stopped at Great Meadows (near Fort Necessity) to bury Braddock, who died July 13, 1755, four days after the battle.

The soldiers laid the general to rest along the path they had made to Fort Duquesne, covering the grave thoroughly and riding over it so it wouldn't be discovered and desecrated by the French or Indians.

Braddock's remains were removed and reburied in the early 1800s; his grave marker is located along U.S. Route 40 — the National Road — near Farmington. If one local legend is true, Braddock's remains were located by the man who killed him — and it wasn't a Frenchman or an Indian but a Fayette County man named Tom Faucet.

Read more: French and Indian guerilla ambush spelled doom for Braddock's Army | TribLIVE
Follow us: @triblive on Twitter | triblive on Facebook


Read more: French and Indian guerilla ambush spelled doom for Braddock's Army | TribLIVE
Follow us: @triblive on Twitter | triblive on Facebook
 
Is there a meme for cases such as this one. Where after posting a hefty article and mistaking identities you realize how dumb you have been? I should make one and name it David James.

For now this one should make do.

217px-Genius-meme.jpg
 
Why Native Americans are called Indians???

Because whites named everyone other than themselves as Indians. Dutch East Indies for Indonesia, British West Indies for Caribbean, Brazilian Indians for Brazilian tribes, Red Indians for Apaches and Comanche people etc etc.

So technically we of the subcontinent don't even use our own correct name which is Bharat or Bharatiya, and instead go along with what the white colonials named our land.

Christopher Columbus was trying to reach India, when he reached America. Until his death, he thought it was India, and the people there Indians.

You forget that everyone was 'indian' during colonial days.
 
Because whites named everyone other than themselves as Indians. Dutch East Indies for Indonesia, British West Indies for Caribbean, Brazilian Indians for Brazilian tribes, Red Indians for Apaches and Comanche people etc etc.

So technically we of the subcontinent don't even use our own correct name which is Bharat or Bharatiya, and instead go along with what the white colonials named our land.



You forget that everyone was 'indian' during colonial days.


Columbus lived and died long before colonial days. He called them "Indians" because that's where he thought he was. Americo Vespucci clarified the mistake later, and hence the name "America" to the two continents.

Otherwise Europeans did not call everyone Indians. Africans for instance are not called Indians.
 
Because whites named everyone other than themselves as Indians. Dutch East Indies for Indonesia, British West Indies for Caribbean, Brazilian Indians for Brazilian tribes, Red Indians for Apaches and Comanche people etc etc.

So technically we of the subcontinent don't even use our own correct name which is Bharat or Bharatiya, and instead go along with what the white colonials named our land.



You forget that everyone was 'indian' during colonial days.

and pseudo seculars put up a stupid excuses like India is a secular name :lol: and make the whole nation look like still stuck with colonial mentality all in the name of secularism if feeling proud of foreign rule/ imposition on our land is called secular then to hell with it and of opposing it is called communalisn then I am proud to be communal
 
He he

Native Americans are our Chinese cousins split off in a bygone era. Indians are our dysfunctional and wacky neighbour that we try to ignore.
 
Back
Top Bottom