mb444
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2012
- Messages
- 5,410
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
This thread is about the Foreign Debt of Bangladesh. But, many of you are talking here about the domestic Public Debt. Are these two types of debts the same?
If same, why then Pakistan is suffering from the $93 billion debt? it is because this loan is from the foreign loan sharks like WB, ADB, and others which are provided funds by the Jews community.
By the way, within the next few years, BD debt will increase at least to $93 billion when Russia completes the Rooppur atomic power plant. Another $16 billion with interest.
BD loves to borrow foreign dollars to eat Biriyani. Quite a few BAL brats in this forum were celebrating the proposal of a $16 billion foreign loan offer to build a European-style Bullet train. If the GoB accepts this proposal, then the debt will rise to $109 billion. There are many others, too.
The country requires rapid industrialization that will create wealth inside the country. The govt will then be able to collect income and corporate taxes. Even it can borrow more from domestic sources like bank and post office. Real GDP will rise and the proportion of foreign debts will reduce.
BDs total debt exposure is around 40%....BD has over the years has reduced is from around 45% to as low as 36%. In recent years it is growing a little.
Pakistan debt exposure now nearing 100% of GDP. Why are their debt is so high.... well i assume military expenditure....but PK members would be in better position to answer.
But i repeat BD fiscal policy is very clear and very conservative and takes a very long view. Your hyperbole aside facts on the ground is BD debt as absolute number has grown in line with economic expansion deliberately maintaining the ratio.
It is wrong to state BD has spent money frivolously, there are incompetence and graft but our fiscal policy is consistent and effective.
Debt is not always bad... it is about what you are spending the money on. If you borrow to grow critical infastructure then the return on investment realised through increased economic activity should theoretically offset the overall cost of debt many times over. Lets all keep things in perspective.
Last edited: