I largely agree with you, but the term "pan-Islamism" often evokes imagery of hardcore salafis who just go and takfir everyone, a phenomenon largely seen in the 90s and 2000s.
That defeats the purpose of Pan-Islamist if Salafist scums start Takfiring everyone. Trust me, I’m a Shia and I’ve seen few folks Willy nilly curse at Shias at the faintest hint of Iranian involvement in Pakistan.
Read each of my posts, I’m a Pan Islamist for all sects regardless. Those Takfiri fu*ks were on the payroll of the Pakistan state and some still are. They started killing Iranian diplomats in the 90s, then bombing Shia imambargahs in 2000s, and then started killing Sunnis.
@Battlion25 @Sayfullah are Sunnis as far as I know, but they and I 100% agree that our fight is a family issue, an internal issue. The bigger fight is with the Dajjal army sitting in Pindi that’s sponsors all form of non Islamic vices from actively murdering Kashmiri fighters during the 90s (in cahoots with the Indians to ensure Kashmir doesnt get full independence), to advocating Haramkhor behaviors in Pakistan cities, to overthrowing a relative clean, nationalist government.
You can actually see the their faces burn up whenever someone stands up for Muslims or Islam ie IK speech at the UN against Islamophobia, and then that lanat faces Bilawal Bhutto interview where he used the term “Islamic terrorism/extremism” to a western news journalist. These shaitans are secular cum atheist. They worship the devil and will kill anyone who gets in their way.
I would like a clean governance based off just Islamic principles unlike the British left behind rot that we currently have as laws. They were designed by the kuffar for a reason and then the kuffar minions kept the laws to ensure compliance of the masses.
Oh the icing on the cake, not integrating Islamic countries to the left of Pakistan while indirectly dealing with the pagans on the right side. That should tell you where their allegiance lies
