Well.wisher
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2016
- Messages
- 2,977
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Firstborns are more selfish than other youngsters... but are more likely to achieve greatness
By Fiona Macrae for the Daily Mail
Updated: 08:56 BST, 10 December 2009
Need a helping hand? Don't ask an eldest child.
Firstborn children are more selfish and less co-operative than other youngsters, a study has found.
It is thought that the arrival of a younger brother or sister has long-lasting impact on the eldest child's personality, leaving them wary of others and their motives.
The study shows firstborns, such as Kylie Minogue, are more wary of others whereas younger siblings, like Dannii, were found to be more easygoing
The French researchers asked a group of men and women to take part in a financial game designed to assess co-operation.
They played in pairs and each started the game with the same number of Euros.
Player A was asked to give some money to Player B. The donated cash trebled in value on receipt then Player B was asked to give some money back. The risk that Player B may return less money than he was given, or even nothing at all, means that Player A is heavily reliant on trust.
More than 400 volunteers played the game, including 178 firstborns, 48 middle children, 125 lastborns and 66 only children.
Scrutiny of tactics showed that the firstborns gave away 25 per cent less cash when in the role of player A. They also passed less back when in the role of Player B, this week's New Scientist reports.
Share this article
Share
Surprisingly, the only children were just as generous as the lastborn and middle children. The Montpelier University researchers said this showed that the reason for being more co-operative was not just because a child had never known a world without brothers and sisters.
Instead, it appears that something common to firstborns' upbringing makes it harder for them to trust others.
The researchers said: 'Shifting from only to firstborn status following the birth of a younger sibling seems to lead the eldest child to reduce his or her co-operative behaviour.'
Successful firstborns: Author J K Rowling and billionaire presenter Oprah Winfrey
In other words, the shock of finding themselves no longer the centre of their parents' world dents their trust, making them warier of people's motives.
The study is far from the first to link ranking in the family pecking order with personality.
Firstborns have been shown to have higher IQs. This may be because they benefit from having their parents' undivided attention at the start of their lives.
But mollycoddling of the first baby also leads to eldest children growing up to be more conservative, uptight and anxious.
In contrast, younger siblings tend to be more easy-going, more unconventional and more able to cope with stress.
Research shows younger children are likely to be shorter than their older siblings. It is thought that the competition of brothers and sisters for food, attention, money and love, takes its toll on growth.
Worst off is the youngest child in a family of three or more, who, facing the fiercest fight for dwindling resources, tends to be shortest of all.
How many of you can relate to this ??
By Fiona Macrae for the Daily Mail
Updated: 08:56 BST, 10 December 2009
Need a helping hand? Don't ask an eldest child.
Firstborn children are more selfish and less co-operative than other youngsters, a study has found.
It is thought that the arrival of a younger brother or sister has long-lasting impact on the eldest child's personality, leaving them wary of others and their motives.
The study shows firstborns, such as Kylie Minogue, are more wary of others whereas younger siblings, like Dannii, were found to be more easygoing
The French researchers asked a group of men and women to take part in a financial game designed to assess co-operation.
They played in pairs and each started the game with the same number of Euros.
Player A was asked to give some money to Player B. The donated cash trebled in value on receipt then Player B was asked to give some money back. The risk that Player B may return less money than he was given, or even nothing at all, means that Player A is heavily reliant on trust.
More than 400 volunteers played the game, including 178 firstborns, 48 middle children, 125 lastborns and 66 only children.
Scrutiny of tactics showed that the firstborns gave away 25 per cent less cash when in the role of player A. They also passed less back when in the role of Player B, this week's New Scientist reports.
Share this article
Share
Surprisingly, the only children were just as generous as the lastborn and middle children. The Montpelier University researchers said this showed that the reason for being more co-operative was not just because a child had never known a world without brothers and sisters.
Instead, it appears that something common to firstborns' upbringing makes it harder for them to trust others.
The researchers said: 'Shifting from only to firstborn status following the birth of a younger sibling seems to lead the eldest child to reduce his or her co-operative behaviour.'
Successful firstborns: Author J K Rowling and billionaire presenter Oprah Winfrey
In other words, the shock of finding themselves no longer the centre of their parents' world dents their trust, making them warier of people's motives.
The study is far from the first to link ranking in the family pecking order with personality.
Firstborns have been shown to have higher IQs. This may be because they benefit from having their parents' undivided attention at the start of their lives.
But mollycoddling of the first baby also leads to eldest children growing up to be more conservative, uptight and anxious.
In contrast, younger siblings tend to be more easy-going, more unconventional and more able to cope with stress.
Research shows younger children are likely to be shorter than their older siblings. It is thought that the competition of brothers and sisters for food, attention, money and love, takes its toll on growth.
Worst off is the youngest child in a family of three or more, who, facing the fiercest fight for dwindling resources, tends to be shortest of all.
How many of you can relate to this ??
