First Setback to PDM - The FIA refused to take action against Imran Khan
- Thread starter AZ1
- Start date
Areesh
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2010
- Messages
- 45,157
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
@FOOLS_NIGHTMARE in the mud once again
Allah hamarai noon leagui bhai ko hamesha zaleel aur ruswa karai. Aameen
Allah hamarai noon leagui bhai ko hamesha zaleel aur ruswa karai. Aameen
Last edited:
Acetic Acid
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 10, 2021
- Messages
- 2,479
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
No setback in this
There was no foreign funding so no investigation
But FIA is investigating Prohibited funding
Do you really think any state institution can say no to GHQ?
There was no foreign funding so no investigation
But FIA is investigating Prohibited funding
Do you really think any state institution can say no to GHQ?
SIPRA
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2019
- Messages
- 13,549
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
It seems that, on political issues, there is a serious cleavage inside top brass of army and all are not on one page. Consequently, power and control of Mir Bajwa & Co. is somewhat eroded. That is why they have failed to keep Hamza Kukrhi as CM.
HAIDER
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 21, 2006
- Messages
- 33,771
- Reaction score
- 14
- Country
- Location
This is very risky, because if they call it foreign funding/money used for terror financing or any other anti state activity, then they are holding EU,US, and Canada terrorist states, which provided funds for anti state activity. PDM master brain is full of garbage .. Because to prove PTI funding illegal they have to contact foreign agencies and banks.
And this will impact foreign remittances and Pakistanis will be afraid to send money to Pakistan to their family or set up businesses etc ... because that money may hold by banks for further investigations or confiscate.
Last edited:
Path-Finder
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2013
- Messages
- 24,393
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
how low will bajwa sink? not low enough.
SIPRA
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2019
- Messages
- 13,549
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
Criminals have no low.
Yes. The SC did in the CM punjab case.
Acetic Acid
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 10, 2021
- Messages
- 2,479
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
That wasn't even qualify as case
The first case. Vacating the LHC order for an immediate revote and ordering it to take place after 17th July.
-blitzkrieg-
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2015
- Messages
- 6,376
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
Thank bajwa
saying this all along.. ecp didn't call It foreign funding that puts this in trash can. As the investigation agency didn't see any connection of it with anti state activity. But here folks were cursing neutrals for declaring pakistanis foreign agents.
saying this all along.. ecp didn't call It foreign funding that puts this in trash can. As the investigation agency didn't see any connection of it with anti state activity. But here folks were cursing neutrals for declaring pakistanis foreign agents.
RIP Pak LAW
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2014
- Messages
- 9,784
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
FF is all talk with no substance . For foreign funding, you have to prove that the party is taking money for the activities which are against the sovereignty of the state like in the case of BLA and TTP so its a non starter at first place. PDM I believe will even not make a reference to SC for this since it will end up embarrassing the govt badly. The only option they can work on are the certificate signs of party's leader in prohibited funding. Even that case is weaker for PDM to make IK ban.
ghazi52
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2007
- Messages
- 102,922
- Reaction score
- 106
- Country
- Location
,.,.,.
August 7, 2022
PTI leader Fawad Chaudhry on Sunday questioned the summons party leaders received from the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), saying they did not hold public office in 2011-12 — the period in which the party purportedly received prohibited funding.
“I do not understand in what capacity FIA is issuing notices to our leaders. These people were not public officeholders in 2011-12,” Chaudhry said at a news conference in Islamabad. “We are, however, cooperating with the FIA.”
On Friday, the FIA constituted a five-member team to supervise inquiry teams of the agency’s respective zones probing into the prohibited funding case. Subsequently, several prominent PTI leaders — Imran Ismail, Seema Zia, Mahmoodur Rasheed and Asad Qaiser were summoned by the agency. The probe comes after an ECP verdict that found the PTI had indeed received prohibited funding.
Funding probe: PTI leaders summoned by FIA didn’t hold public office in 2011-12, says Fawad
Dawn.comAugust 7, 2022
PTI leader Fawad Chaudhry on Sunday questioned the summons party leaders received from the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), saying they did not hold public office in 2011-12 — the period in which the party purportedly received prohibited funding.
“I do not understand in what capacity FIA is issuing notices to our leaders. These people were not public officeholders in 2011-12,” Chaudhry said at a news conference in Islamabad. “We are, however, cooperating with the FIA.”
On Friday, the FIA constituted a five-member team to supervise inquiry teams of the agency’s respective zones probing into the prohibited funding case. Subsequently, several prominent PTI leaders — Imran Ismail, Seema Zia, Mahmoodur Rasheed and Asad Qaiser were summoned by the agency. The probe comes after an ECP verdict that found the PTI had indeed received prohibited funding.
Similar threads
