What's new

Federal Government bans second Chinese mining investment

Status
Not open for further replies.

striver44

BANNED
Joined
Jul 25, 2016
Messages
4,832
Reaction score
-16
Country
Indonesia
Location
Indonesia
Yibin Tianyi Lithium Industry withdrew its proposed $14.1 million investment application in AVZ Minerals after Australia’s Foreign Investment Review Board advised it would be rejected by the Federal Government.

AVZ Minerals (ASX: AVZ) is the second miner in a week to be hit by the Federal government’s unannounced but clear new tough scrutiny of Chinese investment in the country’s minerals sector.

This time, though, Canberra’s reach has extended to a planned mine in central Africa and demonstrates that the ownership, not necessarily the location, of any critical minerals project is what matters.

Yibin Tianyi Lithium Industry, a lithium chemical producer, has withdrawn its Foreign Investment Review Board application to invest $14.1 million in AVZ after it was advised by the Federal government that the investment would be “contrary to the national interest”.
AVZ has a lithium project, with associated tin and tantalum, in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).

That funding would have given the Chinese company a 12% stake in AVZ.

The announcement made after the market closed on Friday came just one day after Small Caps reported that Treasurer Josh Frydenberg had banned Baogang Group Investments — which is associated with China’s largest rare earth miner — taking a $20m stake in Northern Minerals (ASX: NTU) and its advanced Browns Range rare earth operation in Western Australia.

Earlier in the week, AVZ had released its much-awaited definitive feasibility study (DFS) showing the Manono project would generate almost US$3.8 billion(A$5.95b) in after tax profit over its life.
Government move widens critical minerals surveillance
What differentiates the AVZ case from the Northern Minerals’ one is that the former’s project is outside Australia — and this sends a strong signal to all companies that Canberra is watching the entire critical minerals sector.

In both cases, though, the banned investor has powerful connections at home.

With Northern Minerals, the prospective investor was part of a large state-owned operation with a vast rare earths mine in Inner Mongolia as well as steel interests.

Yibin Tianyi is backed by China’s largest electric vehicle battery maker, CATL, and Suzhou TA&A Ultra Clean Technology.

The latter company manufactures human body protection, environmental protection, and medical products including syringes. It is listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange with a market capitalisation of 5.480bn yuan (A$1.21b)

Chinese partner still wants AVZ’s lithium
AVZ said in its announcement that it understood that the Federal government believed AVZ’s forecast production of 87,500 tonnes per annum of lithium carbonate equivalent from operations planned to begin producing in 2022 was “contrary to the national interest of ‘growing Australia’s critical minerals sector’”.

Yibin Tianyi, however, is not walking away from Manono.

AVZ said the Chinese company was talking to it “to negotiate alternative methods of investment”

Yibin Tianyi is also willing to press on with current negotiations over an offtake agreement for lithium products from Manono.

AVZ managing director Nigel Ferguson said the DFS had generated significant interest from a wide range of investors and potential investors.

“I am confident that we will secure the necessary short term funding as well as longer term debt and equity finance on highly competitive terms,” he added.

Lithium strike length of 13km
AVZ holds a 60% stake in the Manono project which covers 188 sq km in southern DRC with rights to increase that interest.

The project hosts lithium pegmatites over a strike length of more than 13km centred on a historic tin mining area.

The old Manono mine was a tin producer between 1919 and 1982, opened in what was then the Belgian Congo and closed due to a collapse in the world tin price in the 1980s.

The DRC attained its independence from Belgium in 1960.

AVZ also owns 100% of the surrounding Manono Extension project, prospective for lithium, tin, tantalum and associated minerals.

https://smallcaps.com.au/federal-go...ning-investment-avz-minerals-lithium-project/
 
Last edited:
. .
@Slav Defence @WebMaster @waz
This member is constantly posting negative articles about China. The complete Far East Section is filled with this members hatred. It seems like he's been paid to trash China. Please look into it.

I'll speak to the team regarding limiting posted threads. All his threads have the same focus and there are multiple threads on here now.
 
.
I'll speak to the team regarding limiting posted threads. All his threads have the same focus and there are multiple threads on here now.
Thanks waz. As you can see, he has only one agenda.
 
. .
@Slav Defence @WebMaster @waz
This member is constantly posting negative articles about China. The complete Far East Section is filled with this members hatred. It seems like he's been paid to trash China. Please look into it.
As long as news is authentic and there is a verifiable link for it, than I don’t see any problem.
 
.
As long as news is authentic and there is a verifiable link for it, than I don’t see any problem.
Posting negative news is one thing. I don't mind. But this member has an agenda and the thing is, he's never posted anything positive about China. I highly doubt that he's doing it for free.
 
.
why is it became a problem!? his source of news are legit, if "chinese" member in pdf don't like him because he is spreading legit news they can counter it with argument, not trying to banned him, this is democratic forum not CCP mouth piece
 
.
why is it became a problem!? his source of news are legit, if "chinese" member in pdf don't like him because he is spreading legit news they can counter it with argument, not trying to banned him, this is democratic forum not CCP mouth piece
If he's a legit member I would accept negative news from him or anyone. But I don't see that in this member.
He's simply being paid to do. Have you seen him post anything good about China?
Of course you'd stand by him, you see his flag and think, oh, he's Indonesia, let me stand by him.
If you're neutral, you wouldn't be saying this.
 
.
A thread shouldn't be closed just bcz some members dont like the topic of discussion. All Indian members post negative news about Pakistan and same goes for chinese members who post negative news about US or other countries. As long as there is no verbal abuse or some fake news thread without links then everyone has a right to start a discussion.
 
.
I invite the Chinese community members to encounter and respond in appropriate manner.
Also, understand that we are fully aware of intentions made by specific posters. One PDF community should not make posts to demonize other community - just reminding everyone.
This platform is not meant for fueling or mudslinging. I also invite op to define his narrative clearly so that community members of Chinese understand it better and give appropriate response like wise.
Regards
 
.
A thread shouldn't be closed just bcz some members dont like the topic of discussion. All Indian members post negative news about Pakistan and same goes for chinese members who post negative news about US or other countries. As long as there is no verbal abuse or some fake news thread without links then everyone has a right to start a discussion.
It's not about the thread. It's really about the member we are talking about. He's never posted anything neutral about China let alone anything good.
Even Indian members here post negative news about China. Have you seen me complaining against them. I have a doubt on this member and I am asking the mod to look into it. Nothing to do with the thread. I welcome negative news too.
@Slav Defence

I invite the Chinese community members to encounter and respond in appropriate manner.
Also, understand that we are fully aware of intentions made by specific posters. One PDF community should not make posts to demonize other community - just reminding everyone.
This platform is not meant for fueling or mudslinging. I also invite op to define his narrative clearly so that community members of Chinese understand it better and give appropriate response like wise.
Regards
Thank you. :)
 
.
It's not about the thread. It's really about the member we are talking about. He's never posted anything neutral about China let alone anything good.
Even Indian members here post negative news about China. Have you seen me complaining against them. I have a doubt on this member and I am asking the mod to look into it. Nothing to do with the thread. I welcome negative news too.
@Slav Defence


Thank you. :)
It's not about the thread. It's really about the member we are talking about. He's never posted anything neutral about China let alone anything good.
Even Indian members here post negative news about China. Have you seen me complaining against them. I have a doubt on this member and I am asking the mod to look into it. Nothing to do with the thread. I welcome negative news too.
@Slav Defence


Thank you. :)
Open up a thread in GHQ, likewise if op has any concerns or issues then he or she should also submit complains regarding any poster like wise.
Regards
 
.
It's not about the thread. It's really about the member we are talking about. He's never posted anything neutral about China let alone anything good.
Even Indian members here post negative news about China. Have you seen me complaining against them. I have a doubt on this member and I am asking the mod to look into it. Nothing to do with the thread. I welcome negative news too.
@Slav Defence


Thank you. :)

Mate i have yet to see an Indian member who actually posted a +ve news about Pakistan or China on this forum. Best way is to avoid such threads bcz highlighting such member or news just gives it the publicity they want for it. I have seen several Indians disappointed bcz no one came to comment on their threads and their threads die out. But this is only my point of view so i would leave the matter to MODS.
 
.
I'll speak to the team regarding limiting posted threads. All his threads have the same focus and there are multiple threads on here now.

Umm...How about the flood of negative articles posted EVERY day in the Americas forum by multiple Chinese members (like @LKJ86). Any articles @striver44 writes is just a trickle compared to their absolute barrage.

They should be limited first if anybody.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom