DavidSling
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2013
- Messages
- 4,826
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Please don't start this conversation on this threadThats enough to win against Iran.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Please don't start this conversation on this threadThats enough to win against Iran.
There are five, and another two or four are about to arrive next month.Seems soon for IOC, considering there's only 3 so far. When's the next batch arriving?
Is that F-35B's are still on the paper for purchasing by Israel?
In its statement, the Defense Ministry would not specify the exact cost of the fighters, but it noted that for the first time, the F-35 jets will cost under NIS 358 million ($100 million) per airplane, which means the additional aircraft will likely set Israel back at least NIS 6.09 billion ($1.7 billion),
Israel receives over $3 billion a year from the US in military aid, and early this year the two countries agreed on a new aid package that will see Israel receive $3.8 billion annually through 2028, the vast majority of which must be used on purchases from American defense companies.
Israel is threatened by the whole middle east, but more from shia rather than the sunni muslims.Wait, what? "Set Israel back $1.7B?" Doesn't the purchase cost of each of those F-35 come out of...
$3.8B to be precise. Closer to $4B. So why would it set Israel back a single penny?
Here's a snipit from Wiki:
However, there is strong competition for funding. Israeli ground commanders argue that because of the potential threat that the giant and modern Egyptian army would be turned against Israel, it is necessary to establish an additional mechanized division, equipped with Merkava tanks and the new Namer armored personnel carrier. The production of the Namer was moved to General Dynamics Land Systems in the U.S. in order to enable Israel to procure them using US military aid funding, the same funding source used to acquire the F-35s.
I understand that in return for these jets that would be funded from the $3.8B aid package, Israel Aerospace has agreed to exchange some work for the jets? From the same source:
Israel's guarantees of more than US$4B of aerospace work in exchange for their purchase of 20 F-35s valued at US$2.7B
Not sure what and why the US would need$4B in aerospace work TBH.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_F-35_Lightning_II_Israeli_procurement
And BTW, why are you guys threatened by us? Aren't we at peace? Aren't we collaborating against terrorism in general around the Negev and Sina and even with intelligence beyond that area? We need a large army because we are a big country with very long maritime borders and an important strategic location and role in the ME, and our military is only modernizing a long, overdue process, especially the air force and navy. Besides the navy and maybe the number of tanks, I think it's safe to say that Israel is still qualitatively and quantitatively superior to Egypt, especially where it's the most important in the AF but more importantly, Egypt has never indicated any hostility towards Israel for this kind of fear or caution. So why the worry? Does Israel hear threats from Egypt? Is it just talk for funding?
And Egypt did indicate several times hostility toward Israel, just saying.
Israeli annual expenses for defence are around $15-16B. So even $4B is not enough to buy everything, and we still pay the rest of it.Wait, what? "Set Israel back $1.7B?" Doesn't the purchase cost of each of those F-35 come out of...
$3.8B to be precise. Closer to $4B. So why would it set Israel back a single penny?
That's right. We are about to produce 800+ pairs of wings for F-35 customers around the world. This is how F-35 becomes cheaper eventually.I understand that in return for these jets that would be funded from the $3.8B aid package, Israel Aerospace has agreed to exchange some work for the jets? From the same source:
Israel's guarantees of more than US$4B of aerospace work in exchange for their purchase of 20 F-35s valued at US$2.7B
You guys had three different pharaohs in a short period of time, two of them were overthrown. The current one is indeed wishes to collaborate with us against terrorism, and shows no sign of hostility towards Israel. That's good, but who will be next? Maybe someone who would choose to be hostile.And BTW, why are you guys threatened by us? Aren't we at peace? Aren't we collaborating against terrorism in general around the Negev and Sina and even with intelligence beyond that area? We need a large army because we are a big country with very long maritime borders and an important strategic location and role in the ME, and our military is only modernizing a long, overdue process, especially the air force and navy. Besides the navy and maybe the number of tanks, I think it's safe to say that Israel is still qualitatively and quantitatively superior to Egypt, especially where it's the most important in the AF but more importantly, Egypt has never indicated any hostility towards Israel for this kind of fear or caution. So why the worry? Does Israel hear threats from Egypt? Is it just talk for funding?
Yeah, until another muslim brotherhood nut job will threaten to cancel the peace dealGive me an example of these hostile actions. Are you referring to the rapid deployment exercises across the canal? Those are completely defensive, nothing in those to suggest aggression or hostility. Everything is defensive.
There's no aggression from Egypt towards Israel, even in the political realm. I think it's quite the opposite.
Look at this, Shoukry and Netanyahu last November watched the Euro Final together lol.
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/fe...ns-highest-level-history-161107083926863.html
Israeli annual expenses for defence are around $15-16B. So even $4B is not enough to buy everything, and we still pay the rest of it.
That's right. We are about to produce 800+ pairs of wings for F-35 customers around the world. This is how F-35 becomes cheaper eventually.
You guys had three different pharaohs in a short period of time, two of them were overthrown. The current one is indeed wishes to collaborate with us against terrorism, and shows no sign of hostility towards Israel. That's good, but who will be next? Maybe someone who would choose to be hostile.
You're forgetting that the aid is also used to maintenance and spare parts, and producing merkava and namer parts and what not.But the $4 billion is more than enough for the $1.7 billion purchase price required for the additional 20 F-35's. So the money to buy those doesn't come out of the military budget, but rather from the aid money.
But Israel is getting paid to produce those wings. I doubt they're supplying the materials, assembling them and delivering them for free.
Well the first pharaoh was in there for 30 years and never showed any signs of aggression or hostility, quite the opposite. I think the worst thing Mubarak did was piss off Lieberman because he didn't want to visit Israel. But if there ever was a threat, it actually came from Lieberman himself when he said the silly stuff about bombing the Aswan dam lol. Now who's the nuttier or hostile one? I don't think a single Egyptian politician ever said anything remotely close to that. All these politicians are nuts anyway.
The peace treaty is highly respected by Egypt. It's much more conditional and restrictive to Egypt than it is to Israel, so there shouldn't be any fear of hostility whatsoever.
Yeah, until another muslim brotherhood nut job will threaten to cancel the peace deal
Rashad al-Bayumi, the deputy chief of Egypt's largest party, the Muslim Brotherhood, said that they would not recognize Israel and that the treaty could be put to a referendum, emphasizing that while they respected all of their international agreements, they "had the right to review the peace deal" and that the Egyptian people "have yet to speak their mind". Representatives of the group had told U.S. diplomats that they did not intend to revoke the treaty.[25]What do you mean "another?" Morsi affirmed the peace treaty with Israel and even told the Egyptian people how important it was. Not sure what you mean by that.
There are many other projects worth more than $4B combined. Spare parts, jet fuel, e.t.c. Aid money don't cover everything.But the $4 billion is more than enough for the $1.7 billion purchase price required for the additional 20 F-35's. So the money to buy those doesn't come out of the military budget, but rather from the aid money.
Obviously Israel is getting paid, but Israeli engineers are getting paid less than U.S. engineers. It makes the overall flyaway cost of F-35 cheaper, and allows Lockheed Martin to sell more.But Israel is getting paid to produce those wings. I doubt they're supplying the materials, assembling them and delivering them for free.
The peace treaty is being respected by Egyptian pharaohs so far, but Egyptians who do not respect their pharaohs always portrait them with six pointed stars, and clearly do not respect the peace treaty. Your mob storms our embassy, they rape an American journalist and yell "Jew!", your clerics call us "sons of dogs and pigs", and your singers sing "I hate Israeel".Well the first pharaoh was in there for 30 years and never showed any signs of aggression or hostility, quite the opposite. I think the worst thing Mubarak did was piss off Lieberman because he didn't want to visit Israel. But if there ever was a threat, it actually came from Lieberman himself when he said the silly stuff about bombing the Aswan dam lol. Now who's the nuttier or hostile one? I don't think a single Egyptian politician ever said anything remotely close to that. All these politicians are nuts anyway.
The peace treaty is highly respected by Egypt. It's much more conditional and restrictive to Egypt than it is to Israel, so there shouldn't be any fear of hostility whatsoever.