Mr.Cringeworth
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2017
- Messages
- 703
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
hahahha. you dont need an expert to tell us that the movie was nothing but BS. some expert also talked about behind enemy lines F-18 scene getting hit and they also called it nothing but BS. i dont know why they try to create so much drama and glamour in a military movie. make a movie close to reality and i am sure it will be liked more.
Does a review of a YouTube movie warrant a separate thread?
That's true it's supposed to be entertaining not realistic even he admits that in the video above,Last I heard was, movies are for entertainment while documentaries are for knowledge....but some characters will find any excuse to bash Pakistan.
People in our part of the world are at best-seeing tanks and guns in war movies, CGI and aerial combat is new to our folks, I mean we didn't find any weekend warriors criticizing 'Maverick' flying inverted above his enemy and his RIO just happened to have a Polaroid Instamatic at hand to take the shot.
It's a film made to entertain the public not to teach them how the missiles or guns function.
A film release based on an actual event concerning PAF, I would understand, getting audience here on the forum. But that is not the case. So a valid case is not there for such a thread here on the Air Force Forum, IMHO.A review by an actual USN Hornet Pilot, of a International released film, especially about the JF-17. At the very least it does give a look at how our films are received internationally.
A film release based on an actual event concerning PAF, I would understand, getting audience here on the forum. But that is not the case. So a valid case is not there for such a thread here on the Air Force Forum, IMHO.
My point was that the inclusion of such trivia on our forum be done with the stature and dignity of Air Force forum in mind.
But nonetheless, if people here think this ok, then who am I to complain.
Last I heard was, movies are for entertainment while documentaries are for knowledge....but some characters will find any excuse to bash Pakistan.
People in our part of the world are at best-seeing tanks and guns in war movies, CGI and aerial combat is new to our folks, I mean we didn't find any weekend warriors criticizing 'Maverick' flying inverted above his enemy and his RIO just happened to have a Polaroid Instamatic at hand to take the shot.
It's a film made to entertain the public not to teach them how the missiles or guns function.
hahahha. you dont need an expert to tell us that the movie was nothing but BS. some expert also talked about behind enemy lines F-18 scene getting hit and they also called it nothing but BS. i dont know why they try to create so much drama and glamour in a military movie. make a movie close to reality and i am sure it will be liked more.
Very informative. Thanks for the share.
in fact movies are all BS except like perfume/interstellar /inception /god father /the shahshunk etc
ok as per your wish addedDon’t forget Stargate..
Because it is based on the real stargate that is yet to be found on the Giza plateau.