Ex Additional chief secretary Itikhar ahmad Rao confirms IK's fake ballot papers allegations

[mr42O]

Ex Additional chief secretary Itikhar ahmad Rao confirms that Punjab Election commissioner Anwar Mehboob demands 200 people for the printing of fake ballot papers and confirms other allegations which Imran Khan raised

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=10152765409848383

 

[Ahmad1996]

Ex Additional chief secretary Itikhar ahmad Rao confirms that Punjab Election commissioner Anwar Mehboob demands 200 people for the printing of fake ballot papers and confirms other allegations which Imran Khan raised

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=10152765409848383

I still remember Nadeem Malik's show in which he was telling PTI/PAT and government, that enough is enough and you should do something now and remove resignation from table and PTI/PAT replied we don't believe in NS until he resigns and independent enquiry is done. Next day NS boasts about we never called army in Parliament and Nadeem is like oh right I think I shouldn't have told PTI/PAT that and now I understand why they are asking for resignation lolzz

 

[pkuser2k12]

abi b aur sabot caheyan kia ???????????? khoon league ab jan chor do aur kitna zalil ho gay phir election larnay k laik b nahe raho gay

 

[Leader]

rigging is now a proven fact, only a judicial commission probe is left to be done... must punish those who were evolved in rigging.

 

[khawaja07]

Edit: Nvm, sorry i did know that this news was gonna be posted this much early! D:

 

[Peaceful Civilian]

Ex Additional chief secretary Itikhar ahmad Rao confirms that Punjab Election commissioner Anwar Mehboob demands 200 people for the printing of fake ballot papers and confirms other allegations which Imran Khan raised

Even, 24th August, he also mentioned about Urdu bazaar.

 

[Kompromat]

Ex Additional chief secretary Itikhar ahmad Rao confirms that Punjab Election commissioner Anwar Mehboob demands 200 people for the printing of fake ballot papers and confirms other allegations which Imran Khan raised

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=10152765409848383

What a fascist, anti democratic, anarchist thug, out to harm jumhooriat and maishat.

He ought to get some tear gas and rubber bullets, or chuck him in jail without an FIR to face chitrol every night, followed by a continued denial of his arrest.

 

[Jzaib]

we dont need more proofs . but noon leagues supporterswill not believe anythng no matter what you show them.

 

[Norwegian]

Tagging lost Noora or other status-quo folks missing from this thread:
@SBD-3
@WishLivePak
@AsianUnion
@Proudpakistaniguy
@Syed.Ali.Haider

No proofs, huh?

 

[VCheng]

Ex Additional chief secretary Itikhar ahmad Rao confirms that Punjab Election commissioner Anwar Mehboob demands 200 people for the printing of fake ballot papers and confirms other allegations which Imran Khan raised

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=10152765409848383

Is that a personal opinion or an officially established fact after due process?

What a fascist, anti democratic, anarchist thug, out to harm jumhooriat and maishat.
He ought to get some tear gas and rubber bullets, or chuck him in jail without an FIR to face chitrol every night, followed by a continued denial of his arrest.

No, he has a right to his personal opinion, whatever it is, but this is no proof, because that needs a legal and due process to determine.

 

[Norwegian]

Is that a personal opinion or an officially established fact after due process?

A fact confirmed by more than one source.

 

[VCheng]

A fact confirmed by more than one source.

All personal opinions, and zero legally valid proof.

 

[Norwegian]

All personal opinions, and zero legally valid proof.

Hahaha. So if I am an eyewitness to a crime scene, I am not worth anything in court because what I saw was my personal opinion and not a fact? Hahaha!

 

[VCheng]

Hahaha. So if I am an eyewitness to a crime scene, I am not worth anything in court because what I saw was my personal opinion and not a fact? Hahaha!

No, you still have to provide your testimony under oath in a court for it to be legally valid. May be you are in cahoots with one or the other party? It has to be proven that your testimony is legally valid.

 

[Ahmad1996]

No, you still have to provide your testimony under oath in a court for it to be legally valid. May be you are in cahoots with one or the other party? It has to be proven that your testimony is legally valid.

If court will not put all cases pending and we know who's the angel here then he would have given his testimony in court but with every single case pending for 14 months then ofcourse people will come out to the roads.