Awesome
RETIRED MOD
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2006
- Messages
- 22,023
- Reaction score
- 5
Evidence: Syria gas attack work of U.S. allies
Video in link
This is a hard sell for the United States to anyone other than the usual blind fools that follow the white house administrations edicts on wars like divine revelation.
For me, it is all too reminiscent of Iraq. Where the US went bumbling over itself in order to quickly launch an attack without proof or world buy in. Here again the UN has not concluded its findings. The UN was pulled out due to security concerns because someone mysteriously kept firing on them while the Syrians are insisting on an investigation.
Ridiculous that in a warzone, with Taliban (FSA) as the US allies, the doubt on who used the chemical Weapons (and which chemical weapon btw, has not even been established, what qualifies as a chemical weapon?), the first doubt is on the guy who actually got his army hit by the same attack?
I call shenanigans.
Video in link
NEW YORK As the U.S. considers a response to what it calls a chemical weapon attack by Syrias Bashar al-Assad regime that killed hundreds of civilians, reliable Middle Eastern sources say they have evidence the culprits actually were the rebel forces trying to take over the government.
Secretary of State John Kerry accused the Assad government Monday of covering up the use of chemical weapons in a cowardly crime and a moral obscenity that shocked the worlds conscience. Kerry claimed the Obama administration had undeniable evidence that the Assad government was culpable in the use of chemical weapons on civilians in the Aug. 21 attack in Damascus suburbs.
Reports that the Obama administration is considering a military strike against the Assad government continued to circulate Monday. Meanwhile, U.N. weapon inspectors in Syria were fired upon by snipers as they attempted to investigate the site of the Aug. 21 attack.
Assad has rejected charges that his government forces used chemical weapons as preposterous and completely politicized, the Los Angeles Times reported.
He argues Syrian forces were in the targeted area.
How is it possible that any country would use chemical weapons, or any weapons of mass destruction, in an area where its own forces are located? Assad asked in the interview with Izvestia, according to a translation provided by Syrias official news agency and published by the Los Angeles Times.
This is preposterous! These accusations are completely politicized and come on the back of the advances made by the Syrian Army against the terrorists.
Rebel attack?
With the assistance of former PLO member and native Arabic-speaker Walid Shoebat, WND has assembled evidence from various Middle Eastern sources that cast doubt on Obama administration claims the Assad government is responsible for last weeks attack.
A video posted on YouTube, embedded below, shows Free Syrian Army, or FSA, rebel forces launching a Sarin gas attack on a Syrian village.
Another video posted on YouTube shows what appears to be Syrian rebel forces loading a canister of nerve gas on a rocket to fire presumably at civilians and possibly government forces.
As seen below, a screen capture from the video shows rebel civilian forces placing a suspicious blue canister on top of a rocket-launching device.
A separate YouTube video from Syrian television shows a government-captured arsenal of what appears to be nerve gas weapons seized from a rebel stronghold in Jobar, Syria.
This is a hard sell for the United States to anyone other than the usual blind fools that follow the white house administrations edicts on wars like divine revelation.
For me, it is all too reminiscent of Iraq. Where the US went bumbling over itself in order to quickly launch an attack without proof or world buy in. Here again the UN has not concluded its findings. The UN was pulled out due to security concerns because someone mysteriously kept firing on them while the Syrians are insisting on an investigation.
Ridiculous that in a warzone, with Taliban (FSA) as the US allies, the doubt on who used the chemical Weapons (and which chemical weapon btw, has not even been established, what qualifies as a chemical weapon?), the first doubt is on the guy who actually got his army hit by the same attack?
I call shenanigans.