What's new

Even Poland and Morocco have more tourists than India

ChinaToday

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 31, 2011
Messages
4,557
Reaction score
-2
Country
China
Location
United Kingdom
In the days of the British Raj, the colonial government used to flee to Shimla, a rickety Himalayan hill town, every three months. Now, India’s elite makes a similar migration, to London, or France or even Singapore. And not just Indians, people from all over the world have abandoned India, which was touted as one of the most ‘fascinating’ destinations in the world.

Despite our glorious Dal Lake, snow-covered Ladakh; backwaters in Kerala, the adventures of swimming with an elephant; gawping at rhinos and tigers; disappearing in clouds of colours on Holi in Varanasi, the country has not been able to attract too many tourists last year.

In fact, according to the United Nation World Tourism Organisation (UNWTO) figures, India attracted only 6,649 (6.65 million) tourists in 2012.

The figure is surprising, as even Sri Lanka and Bhutan boasted the fastest growth in arrivals last year, both climbing 17 percent. India, the largest destination in the subregion, recorded just a mere 5 percent growth. India’s tourism figures are even fewer than Indonesia, fewer than Bulgaria and only half as many as Poland.

North-East Asia recorded a 6 percent increase in tourists in 2012, led by the rebound in Japan (35 percent) after the decline in arrivals following the Tōhoku earthquake in 2011. Taiwan (pr. of China) reported 20 percent more arrivals and the Republic of Korea 14 percent, while Hong Kong (China) (7 percent) also posted solid growth.

A comparison with China, is embarrassing. At 57.7 million foreign tourists a year, China is behind only the United States and France as the world’s most visited country. In fact, China spent a record US$ 102 billion on international tourism in 2012, up 37 percent on 2011.

There’s more. Saudi Arabia had 13 million tourists, Morocco had more than 9 million tourists, Poland had 13.35 million, in 2012.

UN figures suggest that France had more foreign visitors than any other country in 2012, while the most visited capital city is now, according to one study, was Bangkok.The Thai capital is currently attracting 15.98 million visitors a year, narrowly ahead of London.

The report notes that prospects for 2013 are strongest for Asia and the Pacific (5 to 6 percent), followed by Africa (4 to to 6 percent), the Americas (3 to 4 percent), Europe (2 to 3 percent) and the Middle East (upto 5 percent).

Why such a sad such a state of tourism industry in India?

There may be too many reasons for this. As this Tehelka article notes, too few hotel rooms, inadequate infrastructure, political indifference, mounting garbage, tawdry scams and violent crime, may be just be a few to name.

But how reliable are these tourism statistics? John Kester, manager for tourism trends and marketing at the United Nations World Tourism Organization told BBC, “The quality and depth of statistics varies a lot country by country. ”Typically the data is supplied to the UN from countries statistical offices, tourism ministries and central banks.

The Indian tourism figures begs two questions: First, is our data healthy, and if yes, then what are we doing to fix our woeful tourism data?

http://www.firstpost.com/economy/even-poland-and-morocco-have-more-tourists-than-india-1009777.html
 
.
because they are near europe and get lot of european tourist.. also they have good infrastructure..
compared to that a flight to india is expensive from europe/us/japan, the people who can spend money.

the spend per head is high in india.

because they are near europe and get lot of european tourist.. also they have good infrastructure..
compared to that a flight to india is expensive from europe/us/japan, the people who can spend money.

the spend per head is high in india.
 
.
because they are near europe and get lot of european tourist.. also they have good infrastructure..
compared to that a flight to india is expensive from europe/us/japan, the people who can spend money.

the spend per head is high in india.

because they are near europe and get lot of european tourist.. also they have good infrastructure..
compared to that a flight to india is expensive from europe/us/japan, the people who can spend money.

the spend per head is high in india.

So can you tell the story of Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia? they are more far away from Europe than India but way those three countries attract more European tourist than India?
 
.
The present tourism minister Chiranjeevi is doing good job. Hope the cleaning campaigns in tourist areas becomes huge success. The most important thing to make sure is provide proper security to foreign tourists. Awareness must be created for the foreign tourists about some basic security steps. (Not travelling in night times, contacting police, staying alone in hotels.)
 
.
The present tourism minister Chiranjeevi is doing good job. Hope the cleaning campaigns in tourist areas becomes huge success. The most important thing to make sure is provide proper security to foreign tourists. Awareness must be created for the foreign tourists about some basic security steps. (Not travelling in night times, contacting police, staying alone in hotels.)

Tourist always love night life, if you cannot guarantee their safety your efforts always will be futile. And what kind of conditions it is if the tourist always contact the police, are India like in Syria ? Hey clubbing, doing recreational together with locals it always will be fun than staying alone in Hotel!
 
.
Tourist always love night life, if you cannot guarantee their safety your efforts always will be futile. And what kind of conditions it is if the tourist always contact the police, are India like in Syria ? Hey clubbing, doing recreational together with locals it always will be fun than staying alone in Hotel!

Night life in cities is good in India(major 15-20 cities). If you see attacks on foreign tourists and rape cases in India, almost all of them happen in night times and when the tourists are alone. Safety can be guaranteed in cities and towns but not in villages and remote areas. Police do not usually come to villages. Transport facilities are also not good in most of villages. Tourists must have some knowledge where they are going and how safe is to go alone.
When they do come alone better to have a deal with local travel agencies, which is the best way.(Travelling and living is very low in India).
Its not like contacting police all the time. Knowing some safety measures and precautions is necessary even in America.
 
.
lndia should just concentrate and develop its medical tourism ,
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom