What's new

Engaging China is crucial: Indian foreign secretary

angeldemon_007

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Nov 29, 2010
Messages
5,298
Reaction score
0
Despite the rise of China’s military power, India is seeking to engage China and also make its largest neighbor understand that it and other countries in the region are concerned about China’s rise, Indian Foreign Secretary Nirupama Rao told a delegation of Taiwanese reporters in New Delhi earlier this month.
Rao said it was always good for regional neighbors to engage in an open and inclusive dialogue, which enables the creation of balanced and flexible security in the region.
“I think the way we look at it is that we must engage China rather than isolate it. We must encourage China to be much more transparent, much more open and much more clear about how we view its role in the region,” she told the Taipei Times. “The challenge is to engage China and for China also to understand what the concerns of the region are because I think it has to be a two-way street.”
When asked how China’s growing threat and how India sought to resolve its longstanding border dispute with China, Rao said the matters would take time to settle.
“We have been engaged in negotiations for many years now trying to settle this issue,” she said.
China is growing very fast, she said, adding that China’s economic growth had catapulted it into the ranks of the leading global economic powers and that India saw this very clearly.
With economic strength has come military strength and modernization, she said. China has significant resources and its recent defense budget stood at US$91 billion, an increase of about 12 percent over the last year, she said.
“So we are seeing China’s military budgets grow significantly each year and how does that translate into or affect our region? We see of course the People’s Liberation Army, Navy, is much more visible. You saw the evacuation from Libya. They had a missile frigate in the Mediterranean [Sea]. They are doing anti-piracy work in the Gulf of Aden. They are visible in the Indian Ocean and of course in the Southeast Asian region also. They have demonstrated their military presence in areas quite far from China,” she said.

India has to factor this into its calculations about the future security scenario in its region, she said.
“China says it wants peace in the region and that it wants peaceful development around it, but I think it would help to create a good atmosphere for dialogue and for cooperation,” she said. “There are many areas where there can be cooperation: security of [the] sea, lanes of communication, maritime security, anti-piracy and dialogue on security.”
Meanwhile, during Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao’s (溫家寶) visit to India last year, for the first time the “one China” policy was not mentioned in the India-China joint communique.
However, this should by no means be interpreted as a change in India’s policy, she said.
“Our policy is still [a] ‘one China’ policy, but it was not mentioned in the communique that was issued when Wen Jiabao came here because it makes reference to the previous communiques and joint statements that we had when Chinese leaders had visited India. So I don’t see it as a break in policy,” she said.
Rao said India’s “one China” policy was clear and did not require further elucidation. China is a giant neighbor and India has tried to build relations with it in various areas, she said.
“It serves India’s interests to do so and it is something India intends to pursue diligently,” she said.
As for India’s relationship with Taiwan, Rao said it had developed on another track that included economic, cultural and investment ties. The two countries also have dialogue on science and technology, she said.
However, “there is no political content to this relationship because of the ‘one China’ policy,” she said. “So that is how we have developed this relationship.”
Despite the cordial relationship between Taiwan and India, Rao said there was an information gap between the general public and business community in Taiwan about India and vice versa. The full potential of bilateral ties could be better if these problems were addressed, she said.

Engaging China is crucial: Indian foreign secretary - Taipei Times
 
.
However, this should by no means be interpreted as a change in India’s policy, she said.
“Our policy is still [a] ‘one China’ policy
, but it was not mentioned in the communique that was issued when Wen Jiabao came here because it makes reference to the previous communiques and joint statements that we had when Chinese leaders had visited India. So I don’t see it as a break in policy,” she said.
Rao said India’s “one China” policy was clear and did not require further elucidation. China is a giant neighbor and India has tried to build relations with it in various areas, she said.

This isn't going to please some of the members here...
 
. .
about time Chinese behave and get their paid propagandist here to behave on forums and paid agents in other countries called back to china.. after that they need to get this constant territorial disputes negated ( it ain't going back to them) and then open up more Indian goods to import to china reducing the trade deficit. those 3 get done and China can expect to have India somewhat in its corner.
 
. . . .
I'm amazed that Indians can support not only the occupation of kashmir, which I completely understand they will due to patriotism, but support the violent grip of Israel on Palestine in not only reality but morally and theoretically! Then they have the guts to tell us that Tibet is not part of China!

:tdown:
 
.
I'm amazed that Indians can support not only the occupation of kashmir, which I completely understand they will due to patriotism, but support the violent grip of Israel on Palestine in not only reality but morally and theoretically! Then they have the guts to tell us that Tibet is not part of China!

:tdown:

The difference, is that Kashmir is recognized as "disputed territory" by the international community.

Whereas not ONE single country in the entire world, officially considers Tibet to be independent from China.

Not even India. :D
 
.
@Below_freezing, those Indians only say that to annoy Chinese forumers here, official Indian stance is "One China" and "Tibet an integral part of China" and thats what should matter.

About your comment on Kashmir, its not occupied Kashmir. Let me put it this way, if certain pockets of Kashmir valley weren't Muslim majority, there would never be any separatist issue with Kashmir. And Indians don't support violent grip of Israel over Palestine, we support Israels right to exist peacefully. :cheers:
 
.
Of course we support One China - we do however believe that the one China should be democratic and the regime from China (Taipei) should overthrow the communist, corrupt and genocidal regime based out of China (Peking). This is not dissimilar to the world supporting the idea of a unified Germany with a democratic setup based on the structure of Bonn rather than of East Berlin.
 
.
Of course we support One China - we do however believe that the one China should be democratic and the regime from China (Taipei) should overthrow the communist, corrupt and genocidal regime based out of China (Peking).

Come back when your government is brave enough to take this line. :azn:
 
.
Of course we support One China - we do however believe that the one China should be democratic and the regime from China (Taipei) should overthrow the communist, corrupt and genocidal regime based out of China (Peking). This is not dissimilar to the world supporting the idea of a unified Germany with a democratic setup based on the structure of Bonn rather than of East Berlin.

The KMT claims South Tibet as well and in fact wants it even more badly :lol:
 
.
Of course we support One China - we do however believe that the one China should be democratic and the regime from China (Taipei) should overthrow the communist, corrupt and genocidal regime based out of China (Peking). This is not dissimilar to the world supporting the idea of a unified Germany with a democratic setup based on the structure of Bonn rather than of East Berlin.

PRC was the best choice to be India's neighboring country.

I have seen the discussion of the most Anti-CCP right wing supporters of ROC, some of them even claimed would not hesitate to nuke India if India doesn't want to give up South Tibet.

KMT is more warmongering than CCP, to think they would become your ally is a big mistake.
 
.
The KMT claims South Tibet as well and in fact wants it even more badly :lol:

PRC was the best choice to be India's neighbor country.

I have seen the discussion of the most Anti-CCP right wing supporters of ROC, some of them even claimed would not hesitate to nuke India if India doesn't give up South Tibet.

KMT is more warmongering than CCP, to think they would become your ally is a big mistake.

To think that KMT would ever come to power in mainland China is a bigger joke:lol:? Does KMT still want to do that, or are they content with their island?
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom