Bahoz
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2013
- Messages
- 594
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
I think this is one of the reasons why some of the turkish members and their admin wants me banned. Because nobody is willing to accept truth about Turkey. I will keep on bringing forth the truth even if it means I will get banned for sharing the truth. Now they will gather like a flock of broken radios and call me a supporter of an illegal organisation even though it has nothing to do with this topic - watch and see.
Turkey Convicted in Mesopotamia Publishing Case - Bianet
http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng...onid2":["JUDGMENTS"],"itemid":["001-140021"]}
A similar judgement was found by the ECHR some years ago. Not surprisingly, once again it was a Kurdish newspaper that was the victim of the state terror of turkey.
''
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has repeatedly passed judgments on convictions and bans around Özgür Gündem and its successors and articles published there. See List of ECHR cases concerning Article 10 in Turkey.[25] In addition, in Kiliç v. Turkey (2000) it held Turkey responsible for breaching Article 2 by failing to protect the life of Özgür Gündem correspondent Kemal Kılıç, and for failing to hold a proper investigation into his assassination on 18 February 1993.[26]''
http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng...ionid2":["JUDGMENTS"],"itemid":["001-58508"]}
Turkey Convicted in Mesopotamia Publishing Case
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found Turkey guilty in the case of Mesopotamia Publishing, a publishing house closed down due to “causing public disorder”. Ruling that Turkey violated Convention Article 10 on freedom of expression, the court ordered the Turkish state to pay 5,000 euros for damages.
In 1997, following police searches of three of its local branch offices and the confiscation of allegedly illegal publications, including material allegedly used for propaganda, the Ministry of Industry and Trade brought proceedings with a view to the dissolution of Mesopotamia Publishing on account of its activities against public order.
While those from Urfa branch were accused of housing illegal books, the Diyarbakır branch was closed down by a court and those from Izmir branch were charged with PKK propaganda.
“Relying on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing), the company complains that its defense rights were not respected in the dissolution proceedings, in particular because it was not duly informed about the case against it or about the evidence compiled. The company further complains that its dissolution violated its rights, in particular, under Article 10 (freedom of expression),” the ECHR verdict cited. By a court order of October 2001, eventually upheld by the Court of Cassation in January 2003, the company was dissolved. (ÇT/BM)
Turkey Convicted in Mesopotamia Publishing Case - Bianet
http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng...onid2":["JUDGMENTS"],"itemid":["001-140021"]}
A similar judgement was found by the ECHR some years ago. Not surprisingly, once again it was a Kurdish newspaper that was the victim of the state terror of turkey.
''
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has repeatedly passed judgments on convictions and bans around Özgür Gündem and its successors and articles published there. See List of ECHR cases concerning Article 10 in Turkey.[25] In addition, in Kiliç v. Turkey (2000) it held Turkey responsible for breaching Article 2 by failing to protect the life of Özgür Gündem correspondent Kemal Kılıç, and for failing to hold a proper investigation into his assassination on 18 February 1993.[26]''
http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng...ionid2":["JUDGMENTS"],"itemid":["001-58508"]}