Dwarka Civilization

[indianpatriot]

 

[indianpatriot]

 

[GentlemanObserver]

LOL... Yeah right...
That is more like the birth of civilisation in South Asia, not the world. Perhaps the producer should have bothered to also highlight the fact that the "birth of civilisation is debatable at best and not tied down to one particular region in the world"

BBC - History - The Lost Palaces of Iraq

Babylon: Mesopotamia and the Birth of Civilization: Amazon.co.uk: Paul Kriwaczek: Books

 

[indianpatriot]

 

[indianpatriot]

 

[indianpatriot]

some facts have always pinched...Hinduism and many others have this flood concept....and one fact that has touched me alone..Hinduism says that in ancient times Humans lived with Rakchas(Demons) and Vanaras(Monkeys intelligent enough)...now according to this report Indian Civilization could be 11,000yrs old...the time when Homo neanderthal and other species of may have lived....may be Vanaras and Rakhchas were these species only!!!!!

 

[SpArK]

LOL... Yeah right...
That is more like the birth of civilisation in South Asia, not the world. Perhaps the producer should have bothered to also highlight the fact that the "birth of civilisation is debatable at best and not tied down to one particular region in the world"

BBC - History - The Lost Palaces of Iraq

Babylon: Mesopotamia and the Birth of Civilization: Amazon.co.uk: Paul Kriwaczek: Books

Its says 8000 years old... but the thread is of a 10000 year old metropolis

According to Indian mathematics 10000 is greater than 8000 (>).. Im not sure about the maths u studied though.

 

[GentlemanObserver]

Its says 8000 years old... but the thread is of a 10000 year old metropolis

According to Indian mathematics 10000 is greater than 8000 (>).. Im not sure about the maths u studied though.

LOL... No offence but please educate yourself on the subject:
Chapter 1 Learning Objectives - The Birth of Civilization

As i stated earlier this may be the birth of civilisation in the sub continent, but not the world... Older and more historic sites have laid claim to that.

Regards

 

[GentlemanObserver]

some facts have always pinched...Hinduism and many others have this flood concept....and one fact that has touched me alone..Hinduism says that in ancient times Humans lived with Rakchas(Demons) and Vanaras(Monkeys intelligent enough)...now according to this report Indian Civilization could be 11,000yrs old...the time when Homo neanderthal and other species of may have lived....may be Vanaras and Rakhchas were these species only!!!!!

Pinched what? Reality.... Oh please! We are all very facinated with the indus valley civilisations and their historical roots tracing back to the settlement of Homo sapiens in the region dating back to as far as 75,000 years ago.

But to claim that one particular site pre-dates all the known historical monuments to culture and civilisation is a tad bit far fetched.

 

[SpArK]

LOL... No offence but please educate yourself on the subject:
Chapter 1 Learning Objectives - The Birth of Civilization

As i stated earlier this may be the birth of civilisation in the sub continent, but not the world... Older and more historic sites have laid claim to that.

Regards

I was replying to ur post..

Newer and newer things are being discovered each and now and we update as needed. Indeed the video tells us about a "metropolis" which was discovered.
An earlier civilization must have graduated into a city as its a logical reason. So lets wait and see what archeologists come up with on this issue.
Im not debating as to which came first or which came later. But these things are wonderfully fascinating and its not countries pride which we choose to believe but the knowledge about the civilization itself which creates interest.

I wonder what would have been ur reply if Dwaraka was actually in Pakistan.

Any ways lets get on with thread without "i know more' and "yours is bad" arguments

 

[GentlemanObserver]

I was replying to ur post..

Newer and newer things are being discovered each and now and we update as needed. Indeed the video tells us about a "metropolis" which was discovered.
An earlier civilization must have graduated into a city as its a logical reason. So lets wait and see what archeologists come up with on this issue.
Im not debating as to which came first or which came later. But these things are wonderfully fascinating and its not countries pride which we choose to believe but the knowledge about the civilization itself which creates interest.

I wonder what would have been ur reply if Dwaraka was actually in Pakistan.

Any ways lets get on with thread without "i know more' and "yours is bad" arguments

Firstly, I am a lay student of history and don't give two Sh**s about where the find was discovered, i care for the facts. Furthermore I hate this, "what if it was in Pak v.s India (Epenis)" card people pull...

Just because i have a Pakistani flag does not make me a senseless, blind and ignorant bigot... Give us a little credit will you.

 

[indianpatriot]

Firstly, I am a lay student of history and don't give two Sh**s about where the find was discovered, i care for the facts. Furthermore I hate this, "what if it was in Pak v.s India (Epenis)" card people pull...

Just because i have a Pakistani flag does not make me a senseless, blind and ignorant bigot... Give us a little credit will you.

have yous studied from an anti hindu pro arabic Pakistani university...then its AOK!!

 

[Nahraf]

The website where these archaeological videos are taken is an anti-Muslim website. I doubt there are any website that is dedicated just to Hinduism without any anti-Muslim material. The whole Hindutva concept is based on only hating Muslims. This website demeans both Hinduism and archaeology since it mixes it with other videos with such hate. What ever is being presented in these videos which is very interesting and informative but the website stinks.

YouTube - VedicSupremeRace's Channel

 

[GentlemanObserver]

have yous studied from an anti hindu pro arabic Pakistani university...then its AOK!!

What a stupid thing to say... So if i study at a foreign institution i am as you put it "A-OK", but if i studied from a Pakistani institution then i am a bigot? LOL at the logic there Scottie!

Point 1. The people who blew up the buses in London - They graduated from London Universities, they were born and bread in the UK and studied in English schools... Yet they were as extreme as could be.

Point 2. the pursuit of true knowledge transcends petty differences such as race, colour, religion and creed. Despite Darwin being completely opposite to Islamic belief, many Islamic botanists and biologists still study his works today and learn from this great man.

You would do well to remember that.

 

[Awesome]

Please don't go trigger happy with the capital letters...