What's new

DRDO to develop technologies to fight terrorists[FINSAS]

LCA Tejas

BANNED
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Messages
1,512
Reaction score
0
New Delhi: Against the backdrop of increasing terror threats and insurgency, the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), on Saturday said it has ventured into technologies to support security forces in operations, including against nuclear, biological and chemical (NBC) attacks.


The DRDO chief, Mr V.K. Saraswat, said his organisation has opened a Low Intensity Conflict (LIC) Division that would cater to weapons, equipment and life support systems for the paramilitary and police forces.
"Most of the wars in the 20th century are low-intensity conflicts, sub-conventional war, asymmetric warfare, counter-insurgency, and terrorism. These are going to be the emerging battle scenarios. It is going to be the order of the day for the next 100 years.
"The DRDO now has very focused programmes on technologies for low-intensity conflicts, which includes NBC weapons," Mr Saraswat said at a media interaction on the eve of a three-day DRDO directors' conference here.
He said the DRDO also launched another LIC-related programme with soldier-centric technologies with his
"survivability, sustainability, efficiency and lethality" as the focus areas.
"For Futuristic Indian Soldier as a System (F-INSAS), we need technology for his armour, communication, psychological profile, life support, battle scenario devices, scanning devices and grenades. It will be a concerted programme," the DRDO chief controller, Dr W Selvamurthy, said.
"Most of these technologies are spin-offs. We already have technologies from our strategic weapons programme, which can be customised for LIC needs," Mr Saraswat added.



Asked if the shift in focus would impact the DRDO's strategic weapons programme, he said it would not be so. This would be an incremental work to help the nation to achieve self-reliance in this niche area too, he added.
"Both (strategic and LIC programmes) are important. Strategic weapons, you cannot get from anywhere else. Nobody will give you the technology. It has to be developed internally. Most of the LIC technologies are also important," Mr Saraswat stated.
The DRDO chief said his organisation was a technology provider. "We (the DRDO) identify in consultation with the Home ministry as well as others, if there are gaps in certain areas such as foliage penetration or ground penetration, communication, jamming and communication interception systems, we would work on them and provide solutions," he added.


Asked if there were plans to dump the indigenous INSAS 5.56 mm rifle, the DRDO chief said there were no problems and the feedback received from troops suggested that the weapons were performing satisfactorily. "The problems faced by troops must be a local perception nature, by some individual. But it is not a general perception," he said.
On pitting indigenous Arjun tanks against Russian T-90s, Mr Saraswat said trials would take place soon which will not compare the tanks' capabilities but test operational advantages in different terrains and weather conditions to decide on their deployment patterns.



To a query on night blindness of Army's tanks, he said the DRDO possessed third generation technology for night vision devices and it "needs to catch up" with the latest technologies.
About unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) programmes, the DRDO chief said Nishant and Lakshya were in progress, apart from a Medium Altitude Long Endurance (MALE) UAV Rustom, a prototype of which was flown for the first time a couple of months ago. "We are also working on a High Altitude Long Endurance (HALE) system. These UAVs would be out mainstay programmes."
The DRDO was also working on a micro UAV for use by troops in LIC by providing it a payload for surveillance. However, Mr Saraswat said the DRDO had no unmanned combat aerial vehicle (UCAV) programme, though it possessed necessary technology to build one.


The DRDO, he pointed out, had developed unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs), which played roles such as surveillance, bomb disposal, mine laying and demining operations. "We want to give UGVs a bigger role than it is performing now. But it cannot become replacements for human beings," he added.
On a new engine for the Light Combat Aircraft (LCA-Mk2), he said an indigenous project called Kaveri, in association with French company Snecma, was in progress, apart from looking at engines from Eurojet and General Electric.


http://www.deccanchronicle.com/gadgetology/drdo-develop-technologies-fight-terrorists-insurgents-959
 
. . . .
we wld appreciate if u cld post this thread in the appropiate section - it has nothing to do with Pakistan's War

mods pls do the needful!
 
. .
My dear sir, if you got nothing to contribute, cant you atleast leave the thread for some good debate?

What else could DODO have to do with Pakistan's War except for arming the TTP?
 
. .
Members constantly posting articles and threads in the wrong sections, i don't understand why don't they read the description written under each section telling what it is for, e.g the Pakistan's War says very clearly: Discussions on Pakistan's struggle against the militancy. Dont post any topics related to India. Post U.S. "War on Terror" topics in World Affairs forum., so how hard is it to understand this.

DRDO has to develop technologies for its own Army to combat terrorism, what it had to do with Pakistan's War.

So it it requested to members to read the description under the section heading and see what it is for and then create a thread.

Thanks
 
.
Members constantly posting articles and threads in the wrong sections, i don't understand why don't they read the description written under each section telling what it is for, e.g the Pakistan's War says very clearly: Discussions on Pakistan's struggle against the militancy. Dont post any topics related to India. Post U.S. "War on Terror" topics in World Affairs forum., so how hard is it to understand this.

DRDO has to develop technologies for its own Army to combat terrorism, what it had to do with Pakistan's War.

So it it requested to members to read the description under the section heading and see what it is for and then create a thread.

Thanks

Sorry sir, I was clicking India defense on a live post, post slipped to pakistan war and And Got clicked.... I posted it in a hurry.... Iam sorry.. my bad....
 
.
DRDO is a bogus organization and don't need to take them seriously... Its a plagued organization only makes us April Fool all the times....
 
.
DRDO is a bogus organization and don't need to take them seriously... Its a plagued organization only makes us April Fool all the times....

DRDO takes a hell lot of time, why???? We are a developing country, DRDO is an organization working technologies which we dont have any Idea about, LCA and Arjun took ages to complete, and still LCA is in testing phase.... We have to know everything about the new technologies, that can be only possible if U start your own R&D... We might be late comparing to other developed countries, but we are well on track....
 
.
DRDO takes a hell lot of time, why???? We are a developing country, DRDO is an organization working technologies which we dont have any Idea about, LCA and Arjun took ages to complete, and still LCA is in testing phase.... We have to know everything about the new technologies, that can be only possible if U start your own R&D... We might be late comparing to other developed countries, but we are well on track....

Its not about time its about final product..
Why our security forces are still not confident on delivery systems? Why it took so many years to develop a tank that our army does not want to use?
Why IAf is not willing to buy more than 20 LCAs?
Where is the accountability in DRDO?
DRDO is govt org and should be privatised for the sake of our money..
and least INSAS is also not of any use...
 
.
Its not about time its about final product..
Why our security forces are still not confident on delivery systems? Why it took so many years to develop a tank that our army does not want to use?
Why IAf is not willing to buy more than 20 LCAs?
Where is the accountability in DRDO?
DRDO is govt org and should be privatised for the sake of our money..
and least INSAS is also not of any use...

Our armed forces have been using best quality weapon systems, What DRDO develops cannot match the quality of Russian or US goods which our forces use, so We cannot degrade our Forces... LCA tejas is a good experiance
 
.
We dont even have a proper Insas rifle but no harm in having a loud mouth and talk of FINSAS
 
.
Back
Top Bottom