What's new

Downing of IAF jets encouraged US mediation

Don't know aboyt him.. but I to made a lot of noise.. so I think I qualify to answer this...

1. IAF penetrated deep enough to prove PAF as not competent enough and IAF superiority. your radars are lemon.
2. You reply was knock and run on the door. still our radar intercepted you and our fighter chased you all way back into your territory (our plane falling in your territory proves that you were dchased all the way back into your own land..you may claim this to be a trap we take that as bravery)
3. You killed our plane.. we killed your plane./
4. Our pilot is alive yours is undergrounded by your Govt forever.

PAF is too weak against IAF
Yea, the same IAF who has now done another U-Turn by claiming they never crossed LOC and instead launched their weapons from within own border.
As for the rest of your chest thumping claims, please refer to your army chief(if you can find him somewhere)....
Remember the words of our DG ISPR.....you can never surprise us but we will and we have.
Keeop listening to your frivolous media and military peddling lies.....and you end up like this......no proof to back up any claims and rest is all hot air.
 
.
Don't argue with me boy, cry in front of your sugardaddies who have spilled the beans about knocking down of two IAF jets by PAF.

One is mig21, which one is other?

The funny thing is, IAF is a collateral damage, the real deal was PAF ground strikes deep inside IOK. Your own military admitted that PAF hit Indian military installations. :D

Stop embrassing yourself.

every thing you wroite is wrong even according to your own govt. first IAF did infact strike deep inside Pakistan... that's something that everyone even in this forum knows. second..our military admitted to have seen attempts by PAF trying to target military installation not that they could gather balls to actually do it.. (hint: you cant sustain the war if you actually do that). so please you stop embarrassing yourself.

Yea, the same IAF who has now done another U-Turn by claiming they never crossed LOC and instead launched their weapons from within own border.
As for the rest of your chest thumping claims, please refer to your army chief(if you can find him somewhere)....
Remember the words of our DG ISPR.....you can never surprise us but we will and we have.
Keeop listening to your frivolous media and military peddling lies.....and you end up like this......no proof to back up any claims and rest is all hot air.

ok as expect .. your just wrote your thoughts.. nothing that you can proof or deny. BBC works for you ?? if it does then see the video to understand how deep IAF penetrated your airspace and your PAF with pants down. As I said your radars are lemon..whereas we intercepted yours quickly and your PAF could not even come even close to what IAF did in terms of intrusion into Pakistan.
 
.
every thing you wroite is wrong even according to your own govt. first IAF did infact strike deep inside Pakistan... that's something that everyone even in this forum knows. second..our military admitted to have seen attempts by PAF trying to target military installation not that they could gather balls to actually do it.. (hint: you cant sustain the war if you actually do that). so please you stop embarrassing yourself.



ok as expect .. your just wrote your thoughts.. nothing that you can proof or deny. BBC works for you ?? if it does then see the video to understand how deep IAF penetrated your airspace and your PAF with pants down. As I said your radars are lemon..whereas we intercepted yours quickly and your PAF could not even come even close to what IAF did in terms of intrusion into Pakistan.





If what you say is true then please remember to post the links to the evidence here.
 
.
https://www.dawn.com/news/1467092

Downing of IAF jets encouraged US mediation


WASHINGTON: The downing of two Indian Air Force (IAF) fighter jets this week persuaded the United States to re-engage Pakistan for ending a dangerous confrontation between South Asia’s two nuclear-armed states, said a former White House official.



:D:D:D


Over to you Indian establishment. How long you think you can keep your billion plus ostriches away from truth?

We have counted for one mig21 so which was the other one? :D
washington post.
 
.
every thing you wroite is wrong even according to your own govt. first IAF did infact strike deep inside Pakistan... that's something that everyone even in this forum knows. second..our military admitted to have seen attempts by PAF trying to target military installation not that they could gather balls to actually do it.. (hint: you cant sustain the war if you actually do that). so please you stop embarrassing yourself.

Eduacte yourself:

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/paf-surgical-strikes-in-india-some-observations-ramification.604880/

Indian targets hit:

We kept in mind that no collateral damage is caused. Therefore, keeping within our own air space, we selected Bhimber Gali, PG Top and Naryan area targets, our pilots locked those target. When they had an option to fire, they manifested responsibility and keeping safety engaged the targets in an open area.”


This is what YOUR air marshal is saying.

Pakistani strikes represented escalation, claims India


When asked if Pakistan's incursion and alleged targeting of military installations could be construed as an act of war, Air Vice Marshal RGK Kapoor avoided a yes or no answer and instead alleged that Pakistan had targeted military installations in its strikes, and that represented an escalation in itself.

As I said, Stop embarrassing yourself. Look for answers as to which one was the second IAF jet blown out of key, the whole point of this thread. We are not asking you to explain the ground damage assessment in IOK , just the collateral damage which is IAF.
 
.
Eduacte yourself:

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/paf-surgical-strikes-in-india-some-observations-ramification.604880/

Indian targets hit:

We kept in mind that no collateral damage is caused. Therefore, keeping within our own air space, we selected Bhimber Gali, PG Top and Naryan area targets, our pilots locked those target. When they had an option to fire, they manifested responsibility and keeping safety engaged the targets in an open area.”


This is what YOUR air marshal is saying.

Pakistani strikes represented escalation, claims India


When asked if Pakistan's incursion and alleged targeting of military installations could be construed as an act of war, Air Vice Marshal RGK Kapoor avoided a yes or no answer and instead alleged that Pakistan had targeted military installations in its strikes, and that represented an escalation in itself.

As I said, Stop embarrassing yourself. Look for answers as to which one was the second IAF jet blown out of key, the whole point of this thread. We are not asking you to explain the ground damage assessment in IOK , just the collateral damage which is IAF.


1. You did not hit military targets.. you targeted.. the difference is the political responsibility and the burden of war that you simpky could not bear. PAf knows thiws.. hence no hit. I am not saying they could not. All I am saying is they did not...why ? because you needs balls to start a war with India.

2. This article has nothing to prove IAf incursion.. my point was IAF intruded deep enough to prove that your radars are lemon and PAF is too weak..whether it is in terms of catching enemy when they enter your space or whether having balls to actually attack military targets. On the contrary inspite of India not having footage or pic yet of the balakot bombing, they are openly claiming to have bombed living beings inside Pakistani territory (not going into whether they are proved or not that can be discussed in other thread) that's the difference am talking about. Only positive that I see for Pakistan is the lucky chance that they got in form of alive pilot who your PM has smartly used to use as an escape route from this escalating situations. That's it.
 
.
ok as expect .. your just wrote your thoughts.. nothing that you can proof or deny. BBC works for you ?? if it does then see the video to understand how deep IAF penetrated your airspace and your PAF with pants down. As I said your radars are lemon..whereas we intercepted yours quickly and your PAF could not even come even close to what IAF did in terms of intrusion into Pakistan.
First of all let me burst your bubble about the so called BBC claims, it's your own military and media crying out that we didn't do this or that but Pakistan is whipping us.
The claims of IAF going deep inside Pakistan is your wishful thinking and name calling is simply proves your frustration, the fact is no one is buying the Bollywood version of story and the world saw the agni pankh getting flamed and the Indian pilot at the mercy of Pakistan Army....and some IAF commander getting sacked.

 
.
First of all let me burst your bubble about the so called BBC claims, it's your own military and media crying out that we didn't do this or that but Pakistan is whipping us.
The claims of IAF going deep inside Pakistan is your wishful thinking and name calling is simply proves your frustration, the fact is no one is buying the Bollywood version of story and the world saw the agni pankh getting flamed and the Indian pilot at the mercy of Pakistan Army....and some IAF commander getting sacked.


But that's Indian media. why would you belive thaqt? I have hundred Indian media that says we shot down f16 with mig 21. Would you belive that? If yes. then I am ready to belive IAf didn't penetrate deep. Let me know your choice.. on a serious note - stop cherry picking and accept the facts,.
 
.
I am interested in behaviours politicians will use to screw others.these asses do more damage long term than weapons.
For the strikes we have no credible information and frankly news channels are completely full of kak on either sides just with cartoons befiting cartoon network. hence we really are not getting any real details to be of any use for now. as i said before until i see guncamera footage etc, we cannot say what was used just hypothesis hyperbole which i cannot waste my time on.


No wait, was it not a stand off weapon that was deployed? The point is very valid, IAF was able to penetrate so where were the radars.

You sounds like butt hurt Zionist watching your sugarbaby getting spanked by someone else.

If you don't have time to study as to what happened, go through this and educate yourself.

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/paf-surgical-strikes-in-india-some-observations-ramification.604880/

We are not discussing proxy wars here, feel free to open a new thread and express your itch there.

We said we hit around Indian military infra with our standoff weapons and they agree we have hit their military targets. One downed IAF MIG21, one IAF mi17, and one another unspecified IAF jet is destroyed. It's quite obvious that who spanked who.

FYI some standoff weaponry used by PAF had some South African collaboration in distant past. In case you are interested.
 
.
every thing you wroite is wrong even according to your own govt. first IAF did infact strike deep inside Pakistan... that's something that everyone even in this forum knows. second..our military admitted to have seen attempts by PAF trying to target military installation not that they could gather balls to actually do it.. (hint: you cant sustain the war if you actually do that). so please you stop embarrassing yourself.



ok as expect .. your just wrote your thoughts.. nothing that you can proof or deny. BBC works for you ?? if it does then see the video to understand how deep IAF penetrated your airspace and your PAF with pants down. As I said your radars are lemon..whereas we intercepted yours quickly and your PAF could not even come even close to what IAF did in terms of intrusion into Pakistan.
Tm ghatia loug kabhi bezti feel nahi krte?
Botched airstrike only killed a crow. PAF shot down a bloody plane ffs.
 
.
But that's Indian media. why would you belive thaqt? I have hundred Indian media that says we shot down f16 with mig 21. Would you belive that? If yes. then I am ready to belive IAf didn't penetrate deep. Let me know your choice.. on a serious note - stop cherry picking and accept the facts,.
Stop being in two minds now, you are only quoting what your media tells you, no confirmation, proof or independent source to back up any of the claims.....no questions asked no answers given
BTW, even your released pilot has made no claims of any sort....just a story created to soften the blows by the PAF.
 
.
But that's Indian media. why would you belive thaqt? I have hundred Indian media that says we shot down f16 with mig 21. Would you belive that? If yes. then I am ready to belive IAf didn't penetrate deep. Let me know your choice.. on a serious note - stop cherry picking and accept the facts,.

If you honestly think a mig21 can bring down f16 I really sorry for you, that would, is big news. RT Russian news would do a entire story on it. Your biggest failure always was endless mocking the JF17 fighter. has now paralysed your nation in its results. your propaganda can only go to a point. none of your ally’s backed up your claims most gone quite and missing. this was a disaster encounter with Pakistan. and the spin you are doing is making you look even more stupid.
 
.
Don't know aboyt him.. but I to made a lot of noise.. so I think I qualify to answer this...

1. IAF penetrated deep enough to prove PAF as not competent enough and IAF superiority. your radars are lemon.
2. You reply was knock and run on the door. still our radar intercepted you and our fighter chased you all way back into your territory (our plane falling in your territory proves that you were dchased all the way back into your own land..you may claim this to be a trap we take that as bravery)
3. You killed our plane.. we killed your plane./
4. Our pilot is alive yours is undergrounded by your Govt forever.

PAF is too weak against IAF
The world is talking about PAF downing IAF jets, the world literally out of words as to how Indians managed to miss targets with even the most advanced Israeli weapon, No F-16 was shot down as mutlile sources have now confirmed it, IAF has backtracked its violation and is now saying that they remained in IAF airspace. PAF o the other hand struck your HQ, does it matter from where? IF today we strike delhi by our missiles, would your argument still be the same? lol
And your pilot is alive, courtesy of Pakistan army....always remember that.
 
.
You sounds like butt hurt Zionist watching your sugarbaby getting spanked by someone else.

If you don't have time to study as to what happened, go through this and educate yourself.

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/paf-surgical-strikes-in-india-some-observations-ramification.604880/

We are not discussing proxy wars here, feel free to open a new thread and express your itch there.

We said we hit around Indian military infra with our standoff weapons and they agree we have hit their military targets. One downed IAF MIG21, one IAF mi17, and one another unspecified IAF jet is destroyed. It's quite obvious that who spanked who.

FYI some standoff weaponry used by PAF had some South African collaboration in distant past. In case you are interested.
pal... watch your language. if you like to get butt issues then get it done by someone of your own kind... man you have serious homo issues - . next, i am not a zionist - my views on zionisms are well know. not getting into the gutter language that is pervasive in coolie land in Queens country.

i am well aware of SA contribution including my actual work from Grinel which is sitting nice and dandy in your Mirages - for your information, thank you very much.
 
Last edited:
.
Barack Obama was hostile to Pakistan. Thankfully, Donald Trump is not. And yes, Pakistan's diplomatic machine was terrible back in the days of Obama but PTI-led government addressed this shortcoming to large extent.

Pakistan seems to have convinced Trump administration to consider political solution for Afghan endgame. Hopefully this path with bear fruit. Now Pakistan need to make sure that Taliban cooperate.
President Trump is a US CEO!! He loves winners, hates losers, cry babies etc...
 
.
Back
Top Bottom