What's new

Doubts about Pakistan president's leadership abilities

fatman17

PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
32,563
Reaction score
98
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Doubts about Pakistan president's leadership abilities

Some say Asif Ali Zardari is unqualified for office. Now he finds himself leading the nation at a time of extraordinary turmoil, even by Pakistani standards.

By Laura King

December 8, 2008

Reporting from Islamabad, Pakistan -- A year ago, Asif Ali Zardari was a political footnote. He was best known as the corruption-tainted, polo-loving husband of Benazir Bhutto, the charismatic former Pakistani prime minister who appeared poised to make a dramatic return to power.

Now Zardari, 53, who took over leadership of Bhutto's party after she was assassinated Dec. 27 and became president three months ago, finds himself head of state at a time of extraordinary turmoil, even by Pakistani standards.


Stung by Indian accusations that Pakistani militants played a leading role in the Mumbai attacks, the country has responded with an outpouring of nationalistic sentiment. For the moment, that sense of affront is uniting Pakistanis of all political persuasions, but many analysts believe it could eventually backfire on Zardari.

To please a domestic audience, he has taken a tough stance toward India, refusing to hand over suspects sought by New Delhi and expressing skepticism that the attacks emanated from Pakistani soil, despite mounting evidence from Indian investigators and Western intelligence.

But at the same time, Zardari is under intense pressure from Washington, his main patron, to crack down on militants suspected of being behind the attacks, although that could provoke a violent backlash from insurgents and their supporters. Pakistani cities and towns have already suffered a campaign of suicide blasts.


Zardari was overwhelmingly elected president by Pakistani lawmakers in September, after leading his wife's political party to victory in parliamentary elections six weeks after her death.

The assassination brought a wave of sympathy for Zardari, who had long been derided as "Mr. 10%" for kickbacks he allegedly demanded on government contracts when his wife was prime minister in the 1990s. But many Pakistanis, particularly among the elite, fear Zardari is simply not up to the task of governance.

" 'Naive' is the word I would use," said Zafarullah Khan, director of the Center for Civic Education in Islamabad. "He really became president only by accident."

Many believe that Zardari falls far short intellectually of his late wife. At a recent luncheon in Islamabad of former lawmakers and diplomats, an elegant woman delivered what was taken as a devastating verdict: "His English is worse than George Bush's!"

Since the Mumbai crisis erupted, Zardari and his aides have made a series of embarrassing missteps. During the siege, the Pakistani civilian government promised to send spy chief Lt. Gen. Ahmed Shuja Pasha to help with the investigation -- only to be forced to rescind the pledge when the military would have none of it.

The Dawn newspaper reported that Zardari's aides were also tricked by a caller who claimed to be India's foreign minister. When the caller made threats of military action to Zardari, the air force spent nearly 24 hours on highest alert before it was found that it was a hoax.

On Tuesday, Zardari told "Larry King Live" that he doubted that the sole captured suspected gunman was a Pakistani national, as India has asserted. On Sunday, Britain's Observer newspaper said it had confirmed the suspect's identity by checking voter registration rolls in his home village, obtaining the national identity card numbers of his parents and conducting interviews with villagers -- steps it would seem easy for Pakistani authorities to have taken.

Even if the India crisis defuses, Zardari is facing what could become a massive wave of discontent with the implementation of fiscal austerity measures mandated by the International Monetary Fund -- which moved last month to rescue Pakistan as it hovered on the brink of financial collapse. Moreover, he appears intimidated by his nation's intelligence apparatus and still lacks a coherent policy for confronting militants.

Some observers, though, believe that given Pakistan's array of long-standing problems, any leader would be struggling to stay afloat.

"It's not so easy," said Shaukat Qadir, a political analyst and retired general. "What he has to do is stand up for Pakistan, but let India know he understands we have to coexist."

King is a Times staff writer.

laura.king@latimes.com
 
.
Op-Ed Contributor

The Terrorists Want to Destroy Pakistan, Too

By ASIF ALI ZARDARI

Published: December 8, 2008
Islamabad, Pakistan

THE recent death and destruction in Mumbai, India, brought to my mind the death and destruction in Karachi on Oct. 18, 2007, when terrorists attacked a festive homecoming rally for my wife, Benazir Bhutto. Nearly 150 Pakistanis were killed and more than 450 were injured. The terrorist attacks in Mumbai may be a news story for most of the world. For me it is a painful reality of shared experience. Having seen my wife escape death by a hairbreadth on that day in Karachi, I lost her in a second, unfortunately successful, attempt two months later.

The Mumbai attacks were directed not only at India but also at Pakistan’s new democratic government and the peace process with India that we have initiated. Supporters of authoritarianism in Pakistan and non-state actors with a vested interest in perpetuating conflict do not want change in Pakistan to take root.

To foil the designs of the terrorists, the two great nations of Pakistan and India, born together from the same revolution and mandate in 1947, must continue to move forward with the peace process. Pakistan is shocked at the terrorist attacks in Mumbai. We can identify with India’s pain. I am especially empathetic. I feel this pain every time I look into the eyes of my children.

Pakistan is committed to the pursuit, arrest, trial and punishment of anyone involved in these heinous attacks. But we caution against hasty judgments and inflammatory statements. As was demonstrated in Sunday’s raids, which resulted in the arrest of militants, Pakistan will take action against the non-state actors found within our territory, treating them as criminals, terrorists and murderers. Not only are the terrorists not linked to the government of Pakistan in any way, we are their targets and we continue to be their victims.

India is a mature nation and a stable democracy. Pakistanis appreciate India’s democratic contributions. But as rage fueled by the Mumbai attacks catches on, Indians must pause and take a breath. India and Pakistan — and the rest of the world — must work together to track down the terrorists who caused mayhem in Mumbai, attacked New York, London and Madrid in the past, and destroyed the Marriott Hotel in Islamabad in September. The terrorists who killed my wife are connected by ideology to these enemies of civilization.

These militants did not arise from whole cloth. Pakistan was an ally of the West throughout the cold war. The world worked to exploit religion against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan by empowering the most fanatic extremists as an instrument of destruction of a superpower. The strategy worked, but its legacy was the creation of an extremist militia with its own dynamic.

Pakistan continues to pay the price: the legacy of dictatorship, the fatigue of fanaticism, the dismemberment of civil society and the destruction of our democratic infrastructure. The resulting poverty continues to fuel the extremists and has created a culture of grievance and victimhood.

The challenge of confronting terrorists who have a vast support network is huge; Pakistan’s fledgling democracy needs help from the rest of the world. We are on the frontlines of the war on terrorism. We have 150,000 soldiers fighting Al Qaeda, the Taliban and their extremist allies along the border with Afghanistan — far more troops than NATO has in Afghanistan.

Nearly 2,000 Pakistanis have lost their lives to terrorism in this year alone, including 1,400 civilians and 600 security personnel ranging in rank from ordinary soldier to three-star general. There have been more than 600 terrorism-related incidents in Pakistan this year. The terrorists have been set back by our aggressive war against them in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas and the Pashtun-majority areas bordering Afghanistan. Six hundred militants have been killed in recent attacks, hundreds by Pakistani F-16 jet strikes in the last two months.

Terrorism is a regional as well as a global threat, and it needs to be battled collectively. We understand the domestic political considerations in India in the aftermath of Mumbai. Nevertheless, accusations of complicity on Pakistan’s part only complicate the already complex situation.

For India, Pakistan and the United States, the best response to the Mumbai carnage is to coordinate in counteracting the scourge of terrorism. The world must act to strengthen Pakistan’s economy and democracy, help us build civil society and provide us with the law enforcement and counterterrorism capacities that will enable us to fight the terrorists effectively.

Benazir Bhutto once said that democracy is the best revenge against the abuses of dictatorship. In the current environment, reconciliation and rapprochement is the best revenge against the dark forces that are trying to provoke a confrontation between Pakistan and India, and ultimately a clash of civilizations.

Asif Ali Zardari is the president of Pakistan.

The New York Times - Breaking News, World News & Multimedia

wonder who the ghost-writer is? any bets?
 
.
Op-Ed Contributor

The Terrorists Want to Destroy Pakistan, Too

By ASIF ALI ZARDARI

Published: December 8, 2008
Islamabad, Pakistan

THE recent death and destruction in Mumbai, India, brought to my mind the death and destruction in Karachi on Oct. 18, 2007, when terrorists attacked a festive homecoming rally for my wife, Benazir Bhutto. Nearly 150 Pakistanis were killed and more than 450 were injured. The terrorist attacks in Mumbai may be a news story for most of the world. For me it is a painful reality of shared experience. Having seen my wife escape death by a hairbreadth on that day in Karachi, I lost her in a second, unfortunately successful, attempt two months later.

The Mumbai attacks were directed not only at India but also at Pakistan’s new democratic government and the peace process with India that we have initiated. Supporters of authoritarianism in Pakistan and non-state actors with a vested interest in perpetuating conflict do not want change in Pakistan to take root.

To foil the designs of the terrorists, the two great nations of Pakistan and India, born together from the same revolution and mandate in 1947, must continue to move forward with the peace process. Pakistan is shocked at the terrorist attacks in Mumbai. We can identify with India’s pain. I am especially empathetic. I feel this pain every time I look into the eyes of my children.

Pakistan is committed to the pursuit, arrest, trial and punishment of anyone involved in these heinous attacks. But we caution against hasty judgments and inflammatory statements. As was demonstrated in Sunday’s raids, which resulted in the arrest of militants, Pakistan will take action against the non-state actors found within our territory, treating them as criminals, terrorists and murderers. Not only are the terrorists not linked to the government of Pakistan in any way, we are their targets and we continue to be their victims.

India is a mature nation and a stable democracy. Pakistanis appreciate India’s democratic contributions. But as rage fueled by the Mumbai attacks catches on, Indians must pause and take a breath. India and Pakistan — and the rest of the world — must work together to track down the terrorists who caused mayhem in Mumbai, attacked New York, London and Madrid in the past, and destroyed the Marriott Hotel in Islamabad in September. The terrorists who killed my wife are connected by ideology to these enemies of civilization.

These militants did not arise from whole cloth. Pakistan was an ally of the West throughout the cold war. The world worked to exploit religion against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan by empowering the most fanatic extremists as an instrument of destruction of a superpower. The strategy worked, but its legacy was the creation of an extremist militia with its own dynamic.

Pakistan continues to pay the price: the legacy of dictatorship, the fatigue of fanaticism, the dismemberment of civil society and the destruction of our democratic infrastructure. The resulting poverty continues to fuel the extremists and has created a culture of grievance and victimhood.

The challenge of confronting terrorists who have a vast support network is huge; Pakistan’s fledgling democracy needs help from the rest of the world. We are on the frontlines of the war on terrorism. We have 150,000 soldiers fighting Al Qaeda, the Taliban and their extremist allies along the border with Afghanistan — far more troops than NATO has in Afghanistan.

Nearly 2,000 Pakistanis have lost their lives to terrorism in this year alone, including 1,400 civilians and 600 security personnel ranging in rank from ordinary soldier to three-star general. There have been more than 600 terrorism-related incidents in Pakistan this year. The terrorists have been set back by our aggressive war against them in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas and the Pashtun-majority areas bordering Afghanistan. Six hundred militants have been killed in recent attacks, hundreds by Pakistani F-16 jet strikes in the last two months.

Terrorism is a regional as well as a global threat, and it needs to be battled collectively. We understand the domestic political considerations in India in the aftermath of Mumbai. Nevertheless, accusations of complicity on Pakistan’s part only complicate the already complex situation.

For India, Pakistan and the United States, the best response to the Mumbai carnage is to coordinate in counteracting the scourge of terrorism. The world must act to strengthen Pakistan’s economy and democracy, help us build civil society and provide us with the law enforcement and counterterrorism capacities that will enable us to fight the terrorists effectively.

Benazir Bhutto once said that democracy is the best revenge against the abuses of dictatorship. In the current environment, reconciliation and rapprochement is the best revenge against the dark forces that are trying to provoke a confrontation between Pakistan and India, and ultimately a clash of civilizations.

Asif Ali Zardari is the president of Pakistan.

The New York Times - Breaking News, World News & Multimedia

wonder who the ghost-writer is? any bets?

A man who cannot even think & talk straight on international issues and needs a 2-hour coaching before addressing the UN writes an article above? Highly unlikely!

From the language of the article it seems Sherry Rehman is the writer. That women is going beyond her call of duty
 
.
Op-Ed Contributor

The Terrorists Want to Destroy Pakistan, Too

By ASIF ALI ZARDARI

Published: December 8, 2008
Islamabad, Pakistan

THE recent death and destruction in Mumbai, India, brought to my mind the death and destruction in Karachi on Oct. 18, 2007, when terrorists attacked a festive homecoming rally for my wife, Benazir Bhutto. Nearly 150 Pakistanis were killed and more than 450 were injured. The terrorist attacks in Mumbai may be a news story for most of the world. For me it is a painful reality of shared experience. Having seen my wife escape death by a hairbreadth on that day in Karachi, I lost her in a second, unfortunately successful, attempt two months later.

The Mumbai attacks were directed not only at India but also at Pakistan’s new democratic government and the peace process with India that we have initiated. Supporters of authoritarianism in Pakistan and non-state actors with a vested interest in perpetuating conflict do not want change in Pakistan to take root.

To foil the designs of the terrorists, the two great nations of Pakistan and India, born together from the same revolution and mandate in 1947, must continue to move forward with the peace process. Pakistan is shocked at the terrorist attacks in Mumbai. We can identify with India’s pain. I am especially empathetic. I feel this pain every time I look into the eyes of my children.

Pakistan is committed to the pursuit, arrest, trial and punishment of anyone involved in these heinous attacks. But we caution against hasty judgments and inflammatory statements. As was demonstrated in Sunday’s raids, which resulted in the arrest of militants, Pakistan will take action against the non-state actors found within our territory, treating them as criminals, terrorists and murderers. Not only are the terrorists not linked to the government of Pakistan in any way, we are their targets and we continue to be their victims.

India is a mature nation and a stable democracy. Pakistanis appreciate India’s democratic contributions. But as rage fueled by the Mumbai attacks catches on, Indians must pause and take a breath. India and Pakistan — and the rest of the world — must work together to track down the terrorists who caused mayhem in Mumbai, attacked New York, London and Madrid in the past, and destroyed the Marriott Hotel in Islamabad in September. The terrorists who killed my wife are connected by ideology to these enemies of civilization.

These militants did not arise from whole cloth. Pakistan was an ally of the West throughout the cold war. The world worked to exploit religion against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan by empowering the most fanatic extremists as an instrument of destruction of a superpower. The strategy worked, but its legacy was the creation of an extremist militia with its own dynamic.

Pakistan continues to pay the price: the legacy of dictatorship, the fatigue of fanaticism, the dismemberment of civil society and the destruction of our democratic infrastructure. The resulting poverty continues to fuel the extremists and has created a culture of grievance and victimhood.

The challenge of confronting terrorists who have a vast support network is huge; Pakistan’s fledgling democracy needs help from the rest of the world. We are on the frontlines of the war on terrorism. We have 150,000 soldiers fighting Al Qaeda, the Taliban and their extremist allies along the border with Afghanistan — far more troops than NATO has in Afghanistan.

Nearly 2,000 Pakistanis have lost their lives to terrorism in this year alone, including 1,400 civilians and 600 security personnel ranging in rank from ordinary soldier to three-star general. There have been more than 600 terrorism-related incidents in Pakistan this year. The terrorists have been set back by our aggressive war against them in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas and the Pashtun-majority areas bordering Afghanistan. Six hundred militants have been killed in recent attacks, hundreds by Pakistani F-16 jet strikes in the last two months.

Terrorism is a regional as well as a global threat, and it needs to be battled collectively. We understand the domestic political considerations in India in the aftermath of Mumbai. Nevertheless, accusations of complicity on Pakistan’s part only complicate the already complex situation.

For India, Pakistan and the United States, the best response to the Mumbai carnage is to coordinate in counteracting the scourge of terrorism. The world must act to strengthen Pakistan’s economy and democracy, help us build civil society and provide us with the law enforcement and counterterrorism capacities that will enable us to fight the terrorists effectively.

Benazir Bhutto once said that democracy is the best revenge against the abuses of dictatorship. In the current environment, reconciliation and rapprochement is the best revenge against the dark forces that are trying to provoke a confrontation between Pakistan and India, and ultimately a clash of civilizations.

Asif Ali Zardari is the president of Pakistan.

The New York Times - Breaking News, World News & Multimedia

wonder who the ghost-writer is? any bets?

Most probably this could be done by a kind cooperative lady.....Who always in front to help and coordinate whole-heartdly, with leading personalities..........even thou She try to keep them please and fresh during a massive protesting mob walk under hot sunshine:azn:.....What a best use of ABC.. of Journalism knowledge in Demo Craxy :smokin::coffee:
 
.
He's elected. Khallaas. All these things were supposed to be said before the elections, not after.
 
. .
I think people voted for (shahid) Benazir Bhutto rather than him....
They knew he comes with the Package. That's the thing about democracy. You need to deal with the consequences of your own decisions. Now the same Pakistanis who wanted the military out are begging for it to come back again and the Gen is like no thank you.

There is no way of undoing the elections. If needed, they can try request their local parliamentarians and senators to go for an impeachment. Other than that, no other way round it.
 
.
They knew he comes with the Package. That's the thing about democracy. You need to deal with the consequences of your own decisions. Now the same Pakistanis who wanted the military out are begging for it to come back again and the Gen is like no thank you.

There is no way of undoing the elections. If needed, they can try request their local parliamentarians and senators to go for an impeachment. Other than that, no other way round it.

Well said Asim bhai....however there is no chance of impeachment as PPP is having majority in the Parliament :hitwall:
 
.
Well said Asim bhai....however there is no chance of impeachment as PPP is having majority in the Parliament :hitwall:
There you go then wait 5 years.

Every mistake should have some punishment right? Think of Zardar as our punishment. But don't call for his removal.
 
.
There you go then wait 5 years.

Every mistake should have some punishment right? Think of Zardar as our punishment. But don't call for his removal.

Well sir seeing Zardari as an individual,yes i doubt his ability to run the state affairs however,He cant do any harm to the interest of Pakistan bcoz in democracy Policy making in the time of war or peace is not a one man show, In fact the top minds of the country are involved in it...

P.S this is my assumption,May be i m wrong.
 
.
Well sir seeing Zardari as an individual,yes i doubt his ability to run the state affairs however,He cant do any harm to the interest of Pakistan bcoz in democracy Policy making in the time of war or peace is not a one man show, In fact the top minds of the country are involved in it...

P.S this is my assumption,May be i m wrong.
No we can still royal jack things up. Zardari knows he has just this ONE chance. Hes not aiming for reelection in 2013. Even PPP knows they will probably split up once it leaves office. The PPP in fact already has, just not making a big show about it.

So they are like plunder as much as you can while you still have the chance! :D And it's our punishment.
 
.
Being opportunist he is enjoying only the elegance of BB but far away from her gallantry.....his own worth not more then a......Ooops!!!


BTW the 'Freedom of Speech' is the basics of democray, otherwise its nothing more then hoax Demo Craxy.:coffee:
 
.
zardari is not a good leader and does not know his enemy from his friends
somebody else should take over b4 he messes something up
 
.
''Democracy ensures that nations do not get better than what they deserve''

GEORGE BERNARD SHAW
 
.
From the language of the article it seems Sherry Rehman is the writer. That women is going beyond her call of duty

not a bad guess but my bet is hussain haqqanni. he has had previous experience as a speech-writer!
 
.
Back
Top Bottom