What's new

Featured Double the Destroyers: China Will Soon Have Almost 40 of These Modern Warships

Zarvan

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
54,470
Reaction score
87
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Double the Destroyers: China Will Soon Have Almost 40 of These Modern Warships


Can America keep up with China's ambitious and speedy ship-building?

by Kris Osborn
The Chinese Navy may double its fleet of destroyers in just the next five years, bringing increased reach, firepower and missile defenses to new areas around the globe.


https://trends.revcontent.com/click...RPfSZ0Gl5m/r5v4GAD9Myd4cxAg&s2s=1&viewed=true

The People’s Liberation Army Navy, which now fields twenty destroyers, is expected to operate as many as thirty-nine of the warships within five years, a move which massively expands the attack reach of the Chinese Navy.

“As of mid-2020, the PLAN currently fields 20 modern aegis-type* destroyers in its order of battle, supported by another 11 older, non-aegis-type destroyers. These 20 modern aegis-type destroyers are made up of six Type 052Cs, 13 Type 052Ds, and one lead Type 055,” a story in The Diplomat writes.

The increase in destroyers parallels a much larger Chinese Naval expansion now causing concern among Pentagon leaders.

A recent Congressional report maps out China’s ambitious aircraft carrier modernization plan. Citing that the Chinese Navy, now having 360 ships, has already well surpassed the U.S. Navy’s 297 ships in terms of sheer size.





Having already launched its second carrier, the Shangdong, the Chinese have embarked upon the construction of a newer, far-more capable third aircraft carrier, according to a May 2020 Congressional Research Service Report, “China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities.”

The People’s Liberation Army Navy, a report in The Diplomat says, will likely have 400 ships and at three-to-four aircraft carriers by 2025.





Following the construction of its first indigenously-built carrier, the second carrier in the fleet overall, modeled after its ski-jump-configured Ukrainian-built Liaoning, the PLAN has embarked upon a larger, flatter, more modern carrier platform with smooth, longer-range electromagnetic catapults similar to the U.S. Ford-class.

An electromagnetic catapult generates a fluid, smooth launch, which is different than a steam-powered “shotgun” type take off. Also, an electromagnetic catapult extends an attack envelope well beyond what China’s existing ski jump launch makes possible.

China’s emerging Type 055 destroyer is also attracting attention from U.S. planners. Interestingly, the ship represents an apparent Chinese effort to build a stealthy destroyer.

The ship has a blended body-bow, smooth exterior, absence of large protruding deck masts and few external deck-mounted weapons. In some respects, the ship does appear to resemble some elements of the U.S. Navy’s stealthy USS Zumwalt destroyer.


https://trends.revcontent.com/click...reHqKLtwuUelx1vZ2c9mwXKzU1u&s2s=1&viewed=true

The Nanchang has very similar-looking deck-mounted guns and a smooth, flat, roundly curved deckhouse. Like the USS Zumwalt, there is a decidedly linear, inwardly-angled hull-deckhouse connection.

It has narrow command post windows and appears to mirror the hull deckhouse configuration of the USS Zumwalt to some extent with radar panels blended into sides of the ship.

Also, the central placement of the deckhouse, blended with a back end area, might represent a deliberate effort to align the ship’s center of gravity and therefore decrease the possibility of capsizing in rough seas.

Some of the ship’s stealth features were pointed out in a 2018 story in The Diplomat, which describes the ship as having a “flared hull with distinctly stealthy features including an enclosed bow,” and hidden mooring points and anchor chains.

This deck structure indeed does reveal an apparent attempt to engineer a ship with a lower radar signature, as there are no externally mounted, angular or protruding weapons systems hanging from the sides of the ship.

There are few separated large, pointy antenna masts apart from one aligned straight up on top of the deckhouse and a small cluster on the back end.

However, unlike the USS Zumwalt, which aligns VLS (Vertical Launch Systems) along the periphery of the ship deck, the Diplomat describes the Type 055 destroyers as having a “64 cell block of VLS.” More concentrated VLS might seem to leave a ship more vulnerable to catastrophic attack should an incoming weapon hit the centralized group of VLS.

Having VLS on the periphery, however, would enable many VLS to sustain functionality in the event that some were disabled or destroyed by enemy attacks. Also, closely stacked VLS would emit a larger heat signature should multiple missiles be launched concurrently.

Kris Osborn is the defense editor for the National Interest. Osborn previously served at the Pentagon as a Highly Qualified Expert with the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army—Acquisition, Logistics & Technology. Osborn has also worked as an anchor and on-air military specialist at national TV networks. He has appeared as a guest military expert on Fox News, MSNBC, The Military Channel, and The History Channel. He also has a Masters Degree in Comparative Literature from Columbia University.

Image: Reuters

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/b...n-have-almost-40-these-modern-warships-165037
 
. .
Double the Destroyers: China Will Soon Have Almost 40 of These Modern Warships


Can America keep up with China's ambitious and speedy ship-building?

by Kris Osborn
The Chinese Navy may double its fleet of destroyers in just the next five years, bringing increased reach, firepower and missile defenses to new areas around the globe.



The People’s Liberation Army Navy, which now fields twenty destroyers, is expected to operate as many as thirty-nine of the warships within five years, a move which massively expands the attack reach of the Chinese Navy.

“As of mid-2020, the PLAN currently fields 20 modern aegis-type* destroyers in its order of battle, supported by another 11 older, non-aegis-type destroyers. These 20 modern aegis-type destroyers are made up of six Type 052Cs, 13 Type 052Ds, and one lead Type 055,” a story in The Diplomat writes.

The increase in destroyers parallels a much larger Chinese Naval expansion now causing concern among Pentagon leaders.

A recent Congressional report maps out China’s ambitious aircraft carrier modernization plan. Citing that the Chinese Navy, now having 360 ships, has already well surpassed the U.S. Navy’s 297 ships in terms of sheer size.





Having already launched its second carrier, the Shangdong, the Chinese have embarked upon the construction of a newer, far-more capable third aircraft carrier, according to a May 2020 Congressional Research Service Report, “China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities.”

The People’s Liberation Army Navy, a report in The Diplomat says, will likely have 400 ships and at three-to-four aircraft carriers by 2025.





Following the construction of its first indigenously-built carrier, the second carrier in the fleet overall, modeled after its ski-jump-configured Ukrainian-built Liaoning, the PLAN has embarked upon a larger, flatter, more modern carrier platform with smooth, longer-range electromagnetic catapults similar to the U.S. Ford-class.

An electromagnetic catapult generates a fluid, smooth launch, which is different than a steam-powered “shotgun” type take off. Also, an electromagnetic catapult extends an attack envelope well beyond what China’s existing ski jump launch makes possible.

China’s emerging Type 055 destroyer is also attracting attention from U.S. planners. Interestingly, the ship represents an apparent Chinese effort to build a stealthy destroyer.

The ship has a blended body-bow, smooth exterior, absence of large protruding deck masts and few external deck-mounted weapons. In some respects, the ship does appear to resemble some elements of the U.S. Navy’s stealthy USS Zumwalt destroyer.



The Nanchang has very similar-looking deck-mounted guns and a smooth, flat, roundly curved deckhouse. Like the USS Zumwalt, there is a decidedly linear, inwardly-angled hull-deckhouse connection.

It has narrow command post windows and appears to mirror the hull deckhouse configuration of the USS Zumwalt to some extent with radar panels blended into sides of the ship.

Also, the central placement of the deckhouse, blended with a back end area, might represent a deliberate effort to align the ship’s center of gravity and therefore decrease the possibility of capsizing in rough seas.

Some of the ship’s stealth features were pointed out in a 2018 story in The Diplomat, which describes the ship as having a “flared hull with distinctly stealthy features including an enclosed bow,” and hidden mooring points and anchor chains.

This deck structure indeed does reveal an apparent attempt to engineer a ship with a lower radar signature, as there are no externally mounted, angular or protruding weapons systems hanging from the sides of the ship.

There are few separated large, pointy antenna masts apart from one aligned straight up on top of the deckhouse and a small cluster on the back end.

However, unlike the USS Zumwalt, which aligns VLS (Vertical Launch Systems) along the periphery of the ship deck, the Diplomat describes the Type 055 destroyers as having a “64 cell block of VLS.” More concentrated VLS might seem to leave a ship more vulnerable to catastrophic attack should an incoming weapon hit the centralized group of VLS.

Having VLS on the periphery, however, would enable many VLS to sustain functionality in the event that some were disabled or destroyed by enemy attacks. Also, closely stacked VLS would emit a larger heat signature should multiple missiles be launched concurrently.

Kris Osborn is the defense editor for the National Interest. Osborn previously served at the Pentagon as a Highly Qualified Expert with the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army—Acquisition, Logistics & Technology. Osborn has also worked as an anchor and on-air military specialist at national TV networks. He has appeared as a guest military expert on Fox News, MSNBC, The Military Channel, and The History Channel. He also has a Masters Degree in Comparative Literature from Columbia University.

Image: Reuters

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/b...n-have-almost-40-these-modern-warships-165037

With average radar, average offensive and flimsy defensive power. Chines should pray that they never face Kolkata class or visakhapatnam class else it will get exposed like Chinese soldiers on 15th of June. They will be helpless.
 
.
With average radar, average offensive and flimsy defensive power. Chines should pray that they never face Kolkata class or visakhapatnam class else it will get exposed like Chinese soldiers on 15th of June. They will be helpless.
I must admit I often have hard time tell whether an Indian is pure trolling or he truly believe what he claimed. :crazy:
 
.
With average radar, average offensive and flimsy defensive power. Chines should pray that they never face Kolkata class or visakhapatnam class else it will get exposed like Chinese soldiers on 15th of June. They will be helpless.
LOL at the Indian in despair after another humiliation :rofl:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
. .
With average radar, average offensive and flimsy defensive power. Chines should pray that they never face Kolkata class or visakhapatnam class else it will get exposed like Chinese soldiers on 15th of June. They will be helpless.
I hope people like you are in majority in India. Pakistan and China couldn't be more happy :)
 
.
With average radar, average offensive and flimsy defensive power. Chines should pray that they never face Kolkata class or visakhapatnam class else it will get exposed like Chinese soldiers on 15th of June. They will be helpless.
ok well an indian on this forum was calling rafael and meteor the best thing human kind has ever made so your claims are understandable!!!! Nation of idiots!!!
 
Last edited:
. .
With average radar, average offensive and flimsy defensive power. Chines should pray that they never face Kolkata class or visakhapatnam class else it will get exposed like Chinese soldiers on 15th of June. They will be helpless.

Massively Outnumbered, outshone on technology and at a major disadvantage on all fronts, the IN will not last.
 
.
Yes be happy of 15 th of june incident. We slap you so hard that you are unable saw your face to any one.
ROLLING LAUGHTER.gif

.
 
.
With average radar, average offensive and flimsy defensive power. Chines should pray that they never face Kolkata class or visakhapatnam class else it will get exposed like Chinese soldiers on 15th of June. They will be helpless.

LoL are you for real? Seriously what do you Indians eat to be this dumb. China is competing with US and as far as Indian navy is concerned you are not even in their calculus. You people via your own stupid bollywood style stunts have turned your Military into a joke.
 
.
With average radar, average offensive and flimsy defensive power. Chines should pray that they never face Kolkata class or visakhapatnam class else it will get exposed like Chinese soldiers on 15th of June. They will be helpless.
Who needs enemies when this is your thought process. I sincerely hope most indians think like you.
 
.
Technical_review_Type_55_stealth_guided_missile_destroyer_Nanchang_of_Chinese_Navy_925_001.jpg




The missile defense systems of the Type 55 combine surface-to-air missiles, anti-ship cruise missiles, land-attack cruise missiles and anti-submarine missiles. It has a total of 112 vertical launch systems (VLS) with 8x8 units in the front deck and 6x8 units in the middle. For the air defense, the ship could be equipped with missiles including HHQ-9B long-range air defense missiles and HQ-16B mid-range air defense missiles. According to the Chinese Naval Industry, Type 55 could be also equipped with a type of mid-close-range surface-to-air missile developed from the DK-10 missile. The HHQ-9B is a naval version of the HQ-9, a medium- to long-range, active radar homing surface-to-air missile. The HQ-16 is a Chinese-made medium-range air defense missile system.

Type 055 could be equipped with YJ-18 anti-ship missiles designed for use against ships and large boats. Chinese media claims the missile has an inertial guidance system using BeiDou Navigation Satellite System data and carries a 300 kg high-explosive warhead or an anti-radiation warhead to destroy electronics at short range.


https://www.navyrecognition.com/ind...ssile-destroyer-nanchang-of-chinese-navy.html
 
.
With average radar, average offensive and flimsy defensive power. Chines should pray that they never face Kolkata class or visakhapatnam class else it will get exposed like Chinese soldiers on 15th of June. They will be helpless.
Most of the Indian navy will look like this if they come up against the 055 and 52D
_62994c46-bb87-11e6-9409-56819dc9550f.jpg

 
.
Back
Top Bottom