Does United Nation Really Resolve the World's Disputes???

[Kashir]

As we all know that United Nation is responsible to maintain peace and security in the world but during the last few decades world is witnessed of many disputes whether those were between two nations or sectarian issues within the countries where UN remained silent or failed to do so.

Starting from Phalisteen where half of the nation is been killed by Israeli forces and their properties have been damaged and occupied by Israel but UN is failed to stop Israel of killing the innocent people in Phalisteen.

Have a look at American attack on Iraq where thousands of civilians have been killed and injured. Properties have been damaged, Saddam is been hanged to death and later they have apologized saying that the intelligence report was not correct etc.

What action should have been taken by UN after this apology?

As an independent organization of the world and using its power; UN should have been launched an investigation and if these nations were found guilty of this crime; they should have been banned of interfering in world's disputes forever. Not only this but UN should have get the rehabilitation of Iraq done by those responsible countries. But..............
United Nation kept silent... Why?

Let us have a look on Burma (Mayanmar) where thousands of Muslims have been burned alive and many have been drowned in the river by buddhist and their government was involve in all this genocide.
Again here United Nation has kept its eyes closed. . . WHY?

There are many other issues like these where UN has not shown any interests to resolve those issues.

One of the Oldest issue in United Nation's Chart is "Kashmir Issue" which was registered in UN's Chart on April 1948. At that time a resolution was passed by United Nation Security Council that there should be a plebiscite to decide the fate of Kashmir but Later with the Indian influence United Nation has removed the issue of Jammu and Kashmir from the list of disputed territories.

Kashmiris are fighting for their Rights of self determination from 1948 and so far more than 120,000 Kashmiris have been killed by Indian forces.
During the current genocide in Kashmir by Indian forces there are more then 70 people have been killed in last two weeks and nearly 5000 are injured. From those injured there are around 200 people who have lost their eyesight due to pallet gun firing from Indian forces. Another 125 have been injured with bullets.

They are still on the roads and asking world to look at them as they are also human being. They are asking all the Human Rights Organizations to open their eyes and see how Indian Army violating Human Rights in Kashmir. And................

They are asking UN to move your telescopes to Kashmir where you will see the Human Being begging for their rights. Asking UN to see that Humans are not only in Europe but in Kashmir too...

 

[kasper95]

As we all know that United Nation is responsible to maintain peace and security in the world but during the last few decades world is witnessed of many disputes whether those were between two nations or sectarian issues within the countries where UN remained silent or failed to do so.

Starting from Phalisteen where half of the nation is been killed by Israeli forces and their properties have been damaged and occupied by Israel but UN is failed to stop Israel of killing the innocent people in Phalisteen.

Have a look at American attack on Iraq where thousands of civilians have been killed and injured. Properties have been damaged, Saddam is been hanged to death and later they have apologized saying that the intelligence report was not correct etc.

What action should have been taken by UN after this apology?

As an independent organization of the world and using its power; UN should have been launched an investigation and if these nations were found guilty of this crime; they should have been banned of interfering in world's disputes forever. Not only this but UN should have get the rehabilitation of Iraq done by those responsible countries. But..............
United Nation kept silent... Why?

Let us have a look on Burma (Mayanmar) where thousands of Muslims have been burned alive and many have been drowned in the river by buddhist and their government was involve in all this genocide.
Again here United Nation has kept its eyes closed. . . WHY?

There are many other issues like these where UN has not shown any interests to resolve those issues.

One of the Oldest issue in United Nation's Chart is "Kashmir Issue" which was registered in UN's Chart on April 1948. At that time a resolution was passed by United Nation Security Council that there should be a plebiscite to decide the fate of Kashmir but Later with the Indian influence United Nation has removed the issue of Jammu and Kashmir from the list of disputed territories.

Kashmiris are fighting for their Rights of self determination from 1948 and so far more than 120,000 Kashmiris have been killed by Indian forces.
During the current genocide in Kashmir by Indian forces there are more then 70 people have been killed in last two weeks and nearly 5000 are injured. From those injured there are around 200 people who have lost their eyesight due to pallet gun firing from Indian forces. Another 125 have been injured with bullets.

They are still on the roads and asking world to look at them as they are also human being. They are asking all the Human Rights Organizations to open their eyes and see how Indian Army violating Human Rights in Kashmir. And................

They are asking UN to move your telescopes to Kashmir where you will see the Human Being begging for their rights. Asking UN to see that Humans are not only in Europe but in Kashmir too...

what can UN do about Kashmir ,after UN passed the resolution on Kashmir ,Pakistan didn't pull out its forces as required . now what's the point in crying.

and all the disputes you mentioned are Muslims ,what has OIC done about it.

 

[Kashir]

what can UN do about Kashmir ,after UN passed the resolution on Kashmir ,Pakistan didn't pull out its forces as required . now what's the point in crying.

and all the disputes you mentioned are Muslims ,what has OIC done about it.

UN has to pressurize both India and Pakistan to go for a plebiscite as the resolution says. Also UN represents the whole world and not the OIC.....

 

[kasper95]

UN has to pressurize both India and Pakistan to go for a plebiscite as the resolution says. Also UN represents the whole world and not the OIC.....

the resolution passed in UN on Kashmir is non binding that's why it did not pressurise Pakistan ,now if UN could not pressurise Pakistan ,do you think it can pressurise India.
the only solution is converting LOC into permanent border.let people who want to settle in Pakistani side be allowed and people who want to settle in Indian side be allowed.

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

As we all know that United Nation is responsible to maintain peace and security in the world but during the last few decades world is witnessed of many disputes whether those were between two nations or sectarian issues within the countries where UN remained silent or failed to do so.

Starting from Phalisteen where half of the nation is been killed by Israeli forces and their properties have been damaged and occupied by Israel but UN is failed to stop Israel of killing the innocent people in Phalisteen.

Have a look at American attack on Iraq where thousands of civilians have been killed and injured. Properties have been damaged, Saddam is been hanged to death and later they have apologized saying that the intelligence report was not correct etc.

What action should have been taken by UN after this apology?

As an independent organization of the world and using its power; UN should have been launched an investigation and if these nations were found guilty of this crime; they should have been banned of interfering in world's disputes forever. Not only this but UN should have get the rehabilitation of Iraq done by those responsible countries. But..............
United Nation kept silent... Why?

Let us have a look on Burma (Mayanmar) where thousands of Muslims have been burned alive and many have been drowned in the river by buddhist and their government was involve in all this genocide.
Again here United Nation has kept its eyes closed. . . WHY?

There are many other issues like these where UN has not shown any interests to resolve those issues.

One of the Oldest issue in United Nation's Chart is "Kashmir Issue" which was registered in UN's Chart on April 1948. At that time a resolution was passed by United Nation Security Council that there should be a plebiscite to decide the fate of Kashmir but Later with the Indian influence United Nation has removed the issue of Jammu and Kashmir from the list of disputed territories.

Kashmiris are fighting for their Rights of self determination from 1948 and so far more than 120,000 Kashmiris have been killed by Indian forces.
During the current genocide in Kashmir by Indian forces there are more then 70 people have been killed in last two weeks and nearly 5000 are injured. From those injured there are around 200 people who have lost their eyesight due to pallet gun firing from Indian forces. Another 125 have been injured with bullets.

They are still on the roads and asking world to look at them as they are also human being. They are asking all the Human Rights Organizations to open their eyes and see how Indian Army violating Human Rights in Kashmir. And................

They are asking UN to move your telescopes to Kashmir where you will see the Human Being begging for their rights. Asking UN to see that Humans are not only in Europe but in Kashmir too...

Unlike National law, International Law is only functional when the veto powers have a common interest.
Every country in the UNSC have the right to propose resolutions, but Your "friend" China does not.

Reason is that they do not like Muslim separatists and neither does Russia.
Pakistanis are continuously lashing out at the US so why should they lift a finger for Muslim separatists.
After Muslim terrorist attacks in France and the UK, focusing on supporting Muslim separatists is
not really high on the agenda.

Why the remaining nations do not propose a resolution is unknown to me, but in politics
You need friends, and the behaviour of Muslims shows a lack of understanding of this.

Egypt is Muslim, but they have their own problem with the Muslim Brotherhood,
so supporting separatism , really?

What Muslim country is a real friend of a non-Muslim country?

I let others comment Your lies.

 

[barbarosa]

UNO has failed and the world is going to 3rd world war fast.

 

[Kashir]

Unlike National law, International Law is only functional when the veto powers have a common interest.
Every country in the UNSC have the right to propose resolutions, but Your "friend" China does not.

Reason is that they do not like Muslim separatists and neither does Russia.
Pakistanis are continuously lashing out at the US so why should they lift a finger for Muslim separatists.
After Muslim terrorist attacks in France and the UK, focusing on supporting Muslim separatists is
not really high on the agenda.

Why the remaining nations do not propose a resolution is unknown to me, but in politics
You need friends, and the behaviour of Muslims shows a lack of understanding of this.

Egypt is Muslim, but they have their own problem with the Muslim Brotherhood,
so supporting separatism , really?

What Muslim country is a real friend of a non-Muslim country?

I let others comment Your lies.

many other things have been mentioned above but you could only saw Kashmir.. This shows your sincerity towards human rights... China has also occupied a part of Kashmir and has no right to oppose the resolution. Come out from the circle of prejudice and you'll see the violation of human rights in Kashmir by Indian forces.. I appreciate that many Indians have raised their voices for Kashmiris and asked government to stop killing the innocent people but still UN did not consider this an issue that has to be interfered. .

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

many other things have been mentioned above but you could only saw Kashmir.. This shows your sincerity towards human rights... China has also occupied a part of Kashmir and has no right to oppose the resolution. Come out from the circle of prejudice and you'll see the violation of human rights in Kashmir by Indian forces.. I appreciate that many Indians have raised their voices for Kashmiris and asked government to stop killing the innocent people but still UN did not consider this an issue that has to be interfered. .

It is quite obvious that the UNSC is not going to take a resolution against one of the veto powers.
Does that need explaining?

For the other two, the explanation stands.
Pakistan/BD has few friends that will go the extra mile on their behalf.

 

[Salik]

UNO has failed and the world is going to 3rd world war fast.

There is no third world war. Please stop using this word. It shows nothing but lack of ability to solve problems and rather have an escape of war and die.

UN has many programmes that are working all over the world.

She could have developed a rescue mission. Like Edhi saab developed a network in Pakistan.

The question is, can UN solve political problems, the answer is no, at least not in current format. She is good for other services but not for politics. So asking about her role has no use.

People will have to solve their problems individually, neighour wise and region wise.

 

[Kashir]

There is no third world war. Please stop using this word. It shows nothing but lack of ability to solve problems and rather have an escape of war and die.

UN has many programmes that are working all over the world.

She could have developed a rescue mission. Like Edhi saab developed a network in Pakistan.

The question is, can UN solve political problems, the answer is no, at least not in current format. She is good for other services but not for politics. So asking about her role has no use.

People will have to solve their problems individually, neighour wise and region wise.

If UN can not solve the political problems to maintain peace in the world then why she is collecting around $-8.5 Billion from different countries. At least she should develop a rescue mission like you said. Actually the fact is that UN is been hijacked by Few super powers and acting as per their wishes. Its not an independent Organization anymore. I suggest Asian and Gulf countries should get their membership cancelled from UN and let it work for Europe and America only.

 

[Salik]

If UN can not solve the political problems to maintain peace in the world then why she is collecting around $-8.5 Billion from different countries. At least she should develop a rescue mission like you said. Actually the fact is that UN is been hijacked by Few super powers and acting as per their wishes. Its not an independent Organization anymore. I suggest Asian and Gulf countries should get their membership cancelled from UN and let it work for Europe and America only.

If you cancel your membership from UN, you'll lose other programmes, UNESCO, UNICEF, UNHCR etc. like i have said. No doubt there is potential of improvement in these sectors but still they are functioning to an extent.

There is a need to start a movement for reforms in the UN.

 

[footmarks]

UN should have declared Palistine and kashmir free, Pakistan a terrorist state and China, US & north Korea should have been put to sanctions. UN should have removed UK & Russia from security council, Israel & India from UN altogether, and pakistan from the world map altogether.

UN is just a global NGO.

 

[Kashir]

If you cancel your membership from UN, you'll lose other programmes, UNESCO, UNICEF, UNHCR etc. like i have said. No doubt there is potential of improvement in these sectors but still they are functioning to an extent.

There is a need to start a movement for reforms in the UN.

Who will start this movement when many Asian countries are running their economy on World bank and IMF's loan and most of the Gulf Countries are under the influence of US and speaking its language.

 

[Kashir]

UN should have declared Palistine and kashmir free, Pakistan a terrorist state and China, US & north Korea should have been put to sanctions. UN should have removed UK & Russia from security council, Israel & India from UN altogether, and pakistan from the world map altogether.

UN is just a global NGO.

I can smell something burning somewhere. . Its not something unexpected because every one talk about humanity when he himself not involved in such violation.. Yes US, INDIA and ISRAEL should be removed from UN because they all are involved in Human Rights violation but removing Pakistan from world map will remain a dream for you people..

 

[footmarks]

I can smell something burning somewhere. . Its not something unexpected because every one talk about humanity when he himself not involved in such violation.. Yes US, INDIA and ISRAEL should be removed from UN because they all are involved in Human Rights violation but removing Pakistan from world map will remain a dream for you people..

For you, human rights mean muslim rights only. That is the problem. You can smell it everywhere and surprisingly not in your own backyard.