Does India Harbour Territorial Ambitions Towards Pakistan or Not?

[Blue_Eyes]

Exactly my point. India still keeps territorial interests in Pakistan but to divide and create them non-hostile states like Bangladesh, Myamar or Bhutan. India may not be able to capture a territory but its territorial interests are still there. What India does with the territory is seondary but as core interst, territory matters to Indian hostile designs.

Recently Indian defense adviser to Modi talked of intervention in Baluchistan to separate it from Pakistan. Weather it has capacity to do that or not is another aspect but question of intention is unquestioned.

Pakistan also wants Balkanization of India, don't say that you don't have the interest in assam, hyderabad and NE

and you have very top secret info. do you work in PMO? there is no Intention of India to separate balochistan from pakistan, its just a rumour.

 

[ranjeet]

why?

So we can start preparing for this ...

"I don't know about india but i can assure you that one day we will reclaim our territory of Indus valley civilization driving the indian people toward central india who have occupied our land"

 

[Stephen Cohen]

I don't know about india but i can assure you that one day we will reclaim our territory of Indus valley civilization driving the indian people toward central india who have occupied our land

Two questions PLEASE

1 Which Indian territory or state do you covet ?
2 Do you know the SIZE and strength of Indian Army ?

 

[SarthakGanguly]

I do not doubt potency of state backed conversions. In today's world where even weakest of governments wield more control than even strong government of Ancient, Demography could be changed in a generation. But who would do that in India? How would it be achieved? I mean when whole of media is dominated by Hindu haters. Reducing Muslims population in India is a national security prerogative. While an individual muslim may be a patriot, but muslims as a group have potentiality to support Islamic armies, as it's victory would be beneficial for them. A Hindu or Sikh does not have that option, so his loyalty is ensured.

It would be better in people stop taking religion seriously, but if they want to have a sky daddy, it is better they have a local one.

Umm, that's a tough question to answer. Let's see how the religions came into being. Buddhism had only one follower at a time. Then it grew. So when there is a will, there is a way. Though I personally consider the chance of that happening as 50%. There is 50% chance at least that Hinduism and other Dharmic faiths will end in India first instead, given the hate cool Indians have for them.

 

[farhan_9909]

Two questions PLEASE

1 Which Indian territory or state do you covet ?
2 Do you know the SIZE and strength of Indian Army ?

1-***anything that fall under the indus valley civilization map,already posted
2-***Yes,but we can't give up our land that too when it is illegally occupied

 

[Bang Galore]

Point where is EASTERN AUSTRALIA on the map?

​

 

[Soumitra]

We only care about our land and let me make it sure,that we won't take any single indian refugee.Either they should leave our territory or be ready to fight as we also won't take prisoners

We only care for the land of the Maurayan Empire. Let me make it sure,that we won't take any single Pakistani refugee.Either they should leave our territory or be ready to fight as we also won't take prisoners

 

[psynic]

State sponsored Conversion.

ETA?

Do tag me when the govt. builds a framework for this.

 

[$@rJen]

why is India used as a bogeyman in Pakistan? For what purpose is this done?

then there'll be no purpose for Pakistan

Does Muslims have freedom enough to cut cow in India?

Yesterday in front of me Muslims killed and sold two fat cows in my place...

 

[gslv mk3]

It is true that India would dare not initiate a full-scale war and thus this gives them more reasons to engage Pakistan in using sub-war strategies and that includes terrorism.

Look who is talking

 

[anonymus]

ETA?

Do tag me when the govt. builds a framework for this.

Probably would never happen, But it does not mean that it is undesirable.It is an undeniable fact that large population of muslims is a danger to security of any country, Whether India, France, Germany, or Australia; even if current climate of political correctness does not allow these views to be publicly aired in MSM.

State sponsored conversions of Muslims make perfect sense, even from Atheist/Secularist point of view. Muslim question is a security question, not religious one.

 

[Blue_Eyes]

1-***anything that fall under the indus valley civilization map,already posted
2-***Yes,but we can't give up our land that too when it is illegally occupied

A country which was named because of that civilization, how can you say that indus civilization is yours??
two nation theory says pakistan is for muslims and in indus valley civilization the religion was similar to hinduism and not even close to islam
the people of that valley used to worship god and goddess
now how can you claim that valley?

Indus Valley Civilization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[farhan_9909]

A country which was named because of that civilization, how can you say that indus civilization is yours??
two nation theory says pakistan is for muslims and in indus valley civilization the religion was similar to hinduism and not even close to islam
the people of that valley used to worship god and goddess
now how can you claim that valley?

Indus Valley Civilization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Named because of civilization?really?tomorrow if we name greece,will it makes us to call greek history as our?

The civilization only belongs to the people who were indigenous to the territory of the civilization and we do know that they were not indians

 

[Echo_419]

Yaar ye zulam mat karo, hum ko wapis le lo.

Phele Teri ghar Wapsi karenge

 

[Blue_Eyes]

Named because of civilization?really?tomorrow if we name greece,will it makes us to call greek history as our?

The civilization only belongs to the people who were indigenous to the territory of the civilization and we do know that they were not indians

Ok sir Le Lijiyega Indus Valley, I can't argue more.