What's new

Do Pakistan Need a Nuclear Submarine to Check US

NiceFarmer

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Nov 13, 2011
Messages
202
Reaction score
0
If situation with US goes worst role of air craft carrier in Indian ocean would be important.

DO we need a nuclear sub to check the threat ?
 
.
Better not to go with the nuclear sub for now, these boomers are noisy unless you got the top SSN technology like US and Russia.

Even we are not sure how far is China's latest Type 095 compared to their latest SSN technology.

BTW, the Qing class SSK will be the best choice since these subs are far less noisy than the boomers.
 
.
If situation with US goes worst role of air craft carrier in Indian ocean would be important.

DO we need a nuclear sub to check the threat ?

An ordinary Sub can deal with an aircraft carrier
 
.
War with USA = We win the short term. But in long runs, when they come with full force, nearly nothing can stop them.

Anyways Pakistan has inked deal of 6 QING class N.Submarines.
 
.
No use in front of USA they will hunt your submarine within minutes.No one know what type of ultra advanced technologies they posses for eg:- no one knows about the stealth helo until osama raid.
 
.
Pakistan need guts and balls to deal with US . If IRAN can be serious threat to US why cant Pakistan who detonated nuke 12 years ago. Go Pakistan:pakistan:
 
. . .
War with USA = We win the short term. But in long runs, when they come with full force, nearly nothing can stop them.

Anyways Pakistan has inked deal of 6 QING class N.Submarines.

how???their one aircraft carrier in arabian sea can take on your entire military..so explain it how??
 
.
America knows the strengths and weaknesses of Pakistan and i think US is not a stupid state to attack a nuclear country like Pakistan.
 
. .
America knows the strengths and weaknesses of Pakistan and i think US is not a stupid state to attack a nuclear country like Pakistan.

time of using nuclear weapons are gone buddy and they wont loose anything id they strikes on you..you dont have capapbility to send missiles to u.s:lol:

---------- Post added at 04:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:19 PM ----------

One single carrier without a strike group is a moving target even for a regional power like Pakistan.

my mistake..ok 1 cbg..one carrier loaded with 100 hornets can take on their entire air force and navy.
its not easy to hit moving target with missiles
 
.
time of using nuclear weapons are gone buddy and they wont loose anything id they strikes on you..you dont have capapbility to send missiles to u.s:lol:

May that day never come when one use a nuke..... But in case that day come we wont need to go to US.... we can find hell lot of em next door.... But again... May that day never come....
 
.
time of using nuclear weapons are gone buddy and they wont loose anything id they strikes on you..you dont have capapbility to send missiles to u.s:lol:

---------- Post added at 04:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:19 PM ----------



my mistake..ok 1 cbg..one carrier loaded with 100 hornets can take on their entire air force and navy.
its not easy to hit moving target with missiles

The US even used 6 strike groups to attack a nation like Iraq during the first Gulf War.

Heck Pakistan ain't Iraq, and do you really believe they finish off a nation like Pakistan with only one single strike group?

Even Yankees themselves don't believe this fallacy.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom