What's new

Divided they fall: Bradford, Batley, Halifax and Keighley among UK’s top 10 ‘least integrated’ areas

asif1986

BANNED
Joined
Mar 17, 2009
Messages
357
Reaction score
0
http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news...-uk-s-top-10-least-integrated-areas-1-7700400

Communities in Yorkshire have been named as among the most divided in the country as a think-tank called on councils to be made legally responsible for improving integration.

Bradford, Batley, Halifax and Keighley were all cited as being among the 10 “least integrated” places in England and Wales in research by Policy Exchange.

The organisation said forcing councils to publish regular audits would focus minds on actions to ensure a better ethnic mix, for example of pupils in certain schools or of staff in public services.

Policy Exchange, launching its new Demography, Immigration and Integration Unit (DMI), said the Government should compile a national analysis of the picture every three to five years.


Its analysis of data from the 2011 consensus – related to 160 places with a population over 20,000 of whom at least 15 per cent were from an ethnic minority – showed significant variations in the extent of inclusion.

Boston in Lincolnshire, which has seen an influx of mostly Eastern European workers in recent years, was deemed the least integrated based on figures including whether residents held UK passports, the ethnic mix of households and employment statuses.

Other areas listed as divided, including Bradford which experienced riots in 2001, also had similar immigration patterns or established minority communities.

David Goodhart, head of Policy Exchange’s new DMI Unit, said: “If there’s a national consensus that we want to avoid parallel lives, any pressure on them to produce figures and to get councillors thinking about how they can make schools and neighbourhoods more mixed is a help.”

He continued: “We know that people of similar backgrounds tend to cluster together but we also know that a good society needs a sense of trust and mutual regard that crosses social and ethnic boundaries.

“It is critical that this country retains its traditions of openness and individual rights and some sense of mutual regard between citizens. That is why the Government should try to promote mixed communities.”

The 10 least-integrated places were identified as Boston, Wisbech, Oldham, Spalding, Bradford, Batley, Halifax, Blackburn, Keighley and Accrington.

The Bradford riots on July 7 2001 caused £10million of damage to the city and more than 1,000 police officers from 10 different forces were involved in controlling the violence.

A report into the cause of the riots published 10 years later by Professor Ted Cantle said the city remained “one of the most deeply segregated in the country”.

During a July speech on extremism Prime Minister David Cameron picked out Bradford and Oldham, which also experienced race riots in 2001, as still among the most divided communities in England.

The most integrated places were mostly prosperous suburbs or towns around London and Birmingham, with the largest minorities being successful Indians or Europeans.

Top was Amersham, followed by Sutton Coldfield, Loughton, Potters Bar, Letchworth Garden City, Stretford, Bushey, West Bridgford, Rickmansworth and Esher.
 
.
There are two kinds of folk in a country. The mainstream population and the outlanders. Mainstream folk always remain mainstream where ever they go in the world. Outlanders always remain outlanders wherever they go. Its basic psychology. Pakistan sent a lot of its northern outlanders to UK and they continue living as outlanders there instead of integrating with the mainstream.
 
. .
UK should stop accepting asylum seekers from it's old colonies and come out of the guilt trip !

Most Pakistanis in UK are not Asylum Speakers. Please do your research before talking about this issue. Thank you.

There are two kinds of folk in a country. The mainstream population and the outlanders. Mainstream folk always remain mainstream where ever they go in the world. Outlanders always remain outlanders wherever they go. Its basic psychology. Pakistan sent a lot of its northern outlanders to UK and they continue living as outlanders there instead of integrating with the mainstream.

Unfortuntately alot of our "rednecks" are living in UK. Just come and visit them once here and you will understand...there is something wrong with them mentally. Don't know if it's because of the high cousin marriage or just general redardness.
 
.
UK should stop accepting asylum seekers from it's old colonies and come out of the guilt trip !

Majority of Pakistanis in the UK are probably 2nd or 3rd generation so I don't know what you're talking about.
 
. .
.
You do know that most South Asians living in the UK are not asylum seekers but 3/4 & 5th generation "citizens" right? This article and some comments reminded of this video:

Yes I know. I am all for employment opportunities and attracting best talent. What I wouldn't support is accepting asylum seekers from ANY country just because they are all fucked up at home.
 
.
Yes the original inhabitants were low skilled workers who were accepted into the country in first place ! Lot of them integrated into society and lot chose to give it a miss. You can never be sure. Hence my opposition !
But it is irrelevent now. These segregated communities now exist and cutting off the flow of new immigrents will not address the situation found in any of these aforementioned communities.
 
.
But it is irrelevent now. These segregated communities now exist and cutting off the flow of new immigrents will not address the situation found in any of these aforementioned communities.

What do you think (as an indian expat) UK should do to avoid this confrontational attitude among the immigrants ?
 
.
It's usually in the northern towns the Pakistanis seem to seclude themselves from other ethnic groups, but in the midlands and south everything is hunky dory. But then you can't really blame the 3rd and 4th generation they go to schools that are 80-90% Pakistani.
 
.
What do you think (as an indian expat) UK should do to avoid this confrontational attitude among the immigrants ?
I'm no expat, I am British born and raised.

My prescription would be education. Mandatory education for every British school child until the age of 18 with a national curriculim that no community can avoid for relgious differences. This cirriculim would include all the values/morals that make the UK an enlightened and advanced nation- equality for all, freedom of relgion, rule of law is paramount etc etc. This would be tested rigourously ( the GCSEs are a JOKE and have no focus on any such "core" values).

To be honest, this problem is so endemic I don't even know if this would be enough as the issues are no longer with the 1st generation but with the 3rd/4th/5th generation and each generation seems to be getting progressively worse- more insular, more radical and more backwards. There may not even be an actual solution given that the demographics favour them.

It's a real mess is all I can say and why I'm getting out of this country the first opportunity I get.
 
.
UK should stop accepting asylum seekers from it's old colonies and come out of the guilt trip !
its eastern european countries too. do you know how you hear how syrain migrants assault women and so on. eastern europeans are much worse. to be honest i would rather have syrain women and children in my town as compared to eastern european. also i have been told bradford is typically called bradistan as theres a huge amount of pakistani's living there. i have been there a couple of times but people dont pay attention to the rules and park anywhere without care for anyone else. but they have good restraunts there though.
@Atanz what are your views
 
.
Yes I know. I am all for employment opportunities and attracting best talent. What I wouldn't support is accepting asylum seekers from ANY country just because they are all fucked up at home.

Read again, most of the people discussed in the article are NOT asylum seekers, they are "British Citizens". To quote the article for you:

"the least integrated based on figures including whether residents held UK passports, the ethnic mix of households and employment statuses."


So to sum up, the Article is NOT about asylum seekers. If you want to discuss the merits and demerits of Asylum in another thread. :)

Disallowing them to import wives from rural areas of Pakistan will do much to alleviate the problem. Either they adapt and find a domestic woman of Pakistani origin or their retard gene gets erased from the gene pool.
I suspect the problem is no domestic Pakistani origin woman wants them for marriage...

Again with the 'Pakistan" they are not all Pakistanis living in those parts of the UK, please don't make assumptions.

The proportion who had settled within 5 years also differs by nationality. For example, a lower proportion of Somali nationals were settled after 5 years (43%) compared with nationals from Bangladesh (93%), Pakistan (88%) and India (87%).
Source: https://www.gov.uk/government/publi...tion-statistics-january-to-march-2015#visas-1

@WebMaster @Horus @waz @WAJsal @HRK please kindly clean up the thread.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom