1. You made claim that before Punjabi's share in bureaucracy increased after introduction of quota system, which is factually wrong as the when Quota was introduced Punjab's share was already over 60% and after quota it actually decreased and the snap i posted clearly talks about Ayub's era as well link of book is there in my post. On other hand you are giving link of wiki article which have not cited any source to back the claims.
Punjab's share in bureaucracy increased by 15-20% after introduction of quota system (they had a max of 40-45% before that), share of rural Sindhis rose to 14% (it was 0% before that). It was all to the detriment of the most educated class, and it was all based on ethnic hatred. Besides, the quota in all federal government organizations was 60% for Punjab not too long ago. In any case, Punjab actually gained after the quota system was introduced and so did the highly illiterate Sindhi.
2. Now be honest about what you have quoted - does the paragraph you proudly quoted not tell that Urdu speakers dominance in bureaucracy for two decades was result of unfair favor hiring which had nothing to do with merit. And it also points out the fact that many of Urdu speakers were economic migrant as their relatives who once settled in Pakistan later called their relatives and handed over govt. jobs to them - they created monopoly in bureaucracy which was broken by Ayub and later by Bhutto.
Regardless, they were still selecting people on merit. Actually, even today we consider the worst trait of Mohajirs to be selection of employees on merit rather then their ethnicity, unlike all the other ethnicities.
And why wouldn't you want a better, organized, educated and competent person at the helm of affairs is beyond me.
LOL - Yeah it's only Urdu speakers who care about education of their children and every Urdu speaker is holding Phd - that's why non-Urdu speaker appear in different CSS exam than Urdu speakers - and CSS exams for non-Urdu speakers are made easier to help them to occupy allocated seats.
As a % of overall ethnic communal population, the Urdu speaking outspend all other ethnicities, combined! Today, Urdu speaking community strongly discourages their children from sitting in CSS or similar examination because the resultant job would entail, and enforce, corrupt practices.....which the Urdu speaking community strongly despises.
BTW - What's the success rate of Urdu speakers in competition of current quota for merit?
Above all others, on merit.
I have already said - I support elimination of Quota system IF all non-Punjabis pledge that will not start crying foul.
Why care about those who may cry in favour of foul practices? Think of the country and of the next generation.
You will be lucky to find honest bureaucrat - they are same irrespective of ethnicity.
No, that is not correct. Usually the Sindhis are extremists in corruption and incompetence then come the Pashtun who are extremely good at cheating as well and then come Punjabis and Urdu Speaking. Atleast with the Urdu speaking, you atleast get a competent person.
Consider Zardari to be extremely corrupt and incompetent and this is why Pakistan lost a got lot in the past 5 years. However, if the same Zardari was extremely competent and had installed a competent Government, he would not only prospered himself, the whole country would have prospered. Basically, corrupt I can digest but incompetent I cannot!
the ones you are defending are also part of the same flaw so dont do that
And who exactly am I defending other then the Urdu speaking, the only ones who actually deserve defending.
i was merely pointing out that when you are committing same crime you dont have any moral right to point fingers at others.
the title of the thread and content is nothing more than rondoopana
What crime have I committed and where have I defended anybody's 'rondoopana'??