What's new

Did the Beginning of Life on Earth Depend on Black Holes?

Kashmiri Pandit

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 12, 2015
Messages
3,023
Reaction score
-2
Country
India
Location
India
Black-hole.jpg


An American researcher believes that there is a chance that complex life on habitable planets, such as Earth, could have been “switched on” by black holes. The results of his research seem to be supported by other theories published recently as well.

Astrophysicist Paul Mason, professor at New Mexico State University in Las Cruces, presented his work on January 6, 2016 at the meeting of the American Astronomical Society in Kissimmee, Fla. He is examining the role of super high-energy particles from black holes and exploding stars in the advent of habitable planets.

According to Discovery News, millions of years ago, before life started on the Earth, the planet was bathed in deadly radiation from the younger, angrier sun as well as a high tide of energetic particles. This energy, in the form of cosmic rays, was blasted around the galaxy and universe by exploding stars and giant black holes at the centers of galaxies. Somehow the exploding stars and black holes calmed down adequately for the cosmic ray flux to drop to more sustainable levels - allowing complex life on Earth-like planets to flourish.

''It has taken the universe a while for the cosmic ray density and the frequency of bad events to decrease enough for life to handle it,'' Mason told Discovery News. He explained that those bad events included supernovas - which were much more common in the early universe. A supernova is commonly thought to be a rare astronomical event. It is a catastrophic destruction of the star which occurs during the last stellar evolutionary stages of a massive star's life.

supermassive-black-hole.jpg


Black Holes and the Expansion of the Universe

In the early universe, another problem for life in galaxies was that everything was much closer together. When the universe was small, everything was packed thick with sterilizing cosmic rays. It took billions of years for the expanding universe to pull things apart. As Mason told Discovery News: “It implies that the expansion of the universe is important for life.”

black-hole-and-a-normal-star.jpg


One element that was helpful to expand life in the universe and eventually fended off cosmic rays were the leftovers of all those supernovas. These were elemental factories thought to have created oxygen and nitrogen atoms, which are now the primary components of our atmosphere. The atmosphere created in this process protects the Earth from all but the most powerful cosmic rays that are still banging around the galaxy. The theory by Paul Mason seems to fit the observable universe, but there are still lots of unanswered questions. He announced that his research on this subject will continue.

Observing Light in a Black Hole

Mason’s finding was published at the same time as another research group announced a related discovery. Astronomers of Kyoto University have learned that black holes can be observed through a simple optical telescope when material from surrounding space falls into them and releases violent bursts of light.

According to The Guardian, Japanese researchers detected light waves from V404 Cygni - an active black hole in the constellation of Cygnus, the Swan - when it awoke from a 26-year-long slumber in June 2015. They have found that the light produced by a black hole can be viewed from a regular 20 cm (7.9 inch) telescope.

activity-of-black-holes.jpg


Mariko Kimura, who belongs to the aforementioned research group, wrote in the journal Naturethat the team’s telescopes spotted flashes of light coming from the black hole over the two weeks it was active. ''We now know that we can make observations based on optical rays - visible light, in other words - and that black holes can be observed without high-spec x-ray or gamma-ray telescopes,'' Kimura told The Guardian.

Storage for 2D Holograms

In August 2015, Professor Stephen Hawking also presented his current ideas about black holes. His research suggests that black holes don't destroy physical information, as was once believed, but they store it in a 2D hologram.

Sci-News.com published Hawking’s explanation that everything in the world is encoded with quantum mechanical information. Thanks to quantum mechanics, information shouldn't disappear, no matter what happens to it. This universal law is applicable to all things, including black holes. Hawking believes that instead of destroying information, black holes encode it into a two-dimensional hologram at the surface of the black hole's event horizon. Thus the role of black holes in creation and destruction of life in the universe remains a hot topic for astronomy.

Representation-of-a-black-hole.jpg
 
. . .
What hawking says never makes any sense to me :P

But in some way we can say that life is a by-product of black-holes since they are the building blocks of galaxies where stars reside. Stars then form heavier elements like carbon and iron which are essential elements of life :)
 
.
What hawking says never makes any sense to me :P

But in some way we can say that life is a by-product of black-holes since they are the building blocks of galaxies where stars reside. Stars then form heavier elements like carbon and iron which are essential elements of life :)

There was a Conspiracy theory floating around as per which , There is no proof of Super massive Black hole at the center of Galaxies . Any Truth ?
 
.
There was a Conspiracy theory floating around as per which , There is no proof of Super massive Black hole at the center of Galaxies . Any Truth ?

ANY LINK ? Well that theory first and foremost should explain what is holding the stars in it's elliptical orbits around the galactic center.
 
. .
What hawking says never makes any sense to me :P
Until the science reaches the point its all wild theory , its some thing like the guy who can shout loudest or garner more ppl will get his view point across.

There was a Conspiracy theory floating around as per which , There is no proof of Super massive Black hole at the center of Galaxies . Any Truth ?
If I publish a paper saying there is white hole inside black hole , you need to agree with it. Not bcos you are ignorant bcos you cannot disprove it. Now say even if you bring your own wild *** theory I will get some thing else to counter it.

Light can be described in terms of wave theory/quantam mechanics bcos we have no idea what it is.

As Einstein wrote: "It seems as though we must use sometimes the one theory and sometimes the other, while at times we may use either. We are faced with a new kind of difficulty. We have two contradictory pictures of reality; separately neither of them fully explains the phenomena of light, but together they do".[1]

Einstein says god created universe but he does not exist.

Trust me all the planets are nothing but atoms with electrons revolving around and we are in some metal/liquid/gas. You are welcome to disprove my theory and become a free radical :p:.
 
.
Light can be described in terms of wave theory/quantam mechanics bcos we have no idea what it is.

As Einstein wrote: "It seems as though we must use sometimes the one theory and sometimes the other, while at times we may use either. We are faced with a new kind of difficulty. We have two contradictory pictures of reality; separately neither of them fully explains the phenomena of light, but together they do".[1]
.

Wrong brother. "Nobody" understands quantum theory is because every one wants to interpret matter as something definite. It's underlying constituents are all functions of probability is what befuddles us.
 
.
There was a Conspiracy theory floating around as per which , There is no proof of Super massive Black hole at the center of Galaxies . Any Truth ?
Scientific evidence of black hole is not full proof and concept of infinite gravity is derived from the lack of observable spectrum radiation,thus considering it a black body of immense mass.But it can also be considered that the expansion of many galaxies are somewhat slow as compared to big bang expansion and the effect of centrifugal and centripetal forces of celestial bodies are varied in theoretical calculation and mathematical modelling thus suggesting a retarding agent in the centre of galaxies.
I myself am not fully sure about it existence. It could be black hole or a cluster of dark matter warping space time boundaries.
 
.
Scientific evidence of black hole is not full proof and concept of infinite gravity is derived from the lack of observable spectrum radiation,thus considering it a black body of immense mass.But it can also be considered that the expansion of many galaxies are somewhat slow as compared to big bang expansion and the effect of centrifugal and centripetal forces of celestial bodies are varied in theoretical calculation and mathematical modelling thus suggesting a retarding agent in the centre of galaxies.
I myself am not fully sure about it existence. It could be black hole or a cluster of dark matter warping space time boundaries.
Any link for that ?
 
. .
. .
Back
Top Bottom