What's new

DID Nawaz really say Pakistan army back stabbed India?


Iran negotiating with British and IRGC seizes tanker?

Hey @VCheng , looks like IRGC just backstabbed the British like you adjudged Pak Army of back stabbing India here.

Or are you ready to accept that IRGC is just doing its job.

@Irfan Baloch Sir, I'm still perplexed that how can an Army be accused of backstabbing its eye to eye sworn enemy.
 
.
Or are you ready to accept that IRGC is just doing its job.

As long as the Iranian Constitution gives them the authority to do what they did, I am fine with it. Can you say the same about the Pakistani "adventure" in Kargil?

I'm still perplexed that how can an Army be accused of backstabbing its eye to eye sworn enemy.

Please try and read the Pakistani Constitution some time. You may find it illuminating. :D
 
.
As long as the Iranian Constitution gives them the authority to do what they did, I am fine with it. Can you say the same about the Pakistani "adventure" in Kargil?

Where does it prohibit it and under interpretation of which article?

spoon feed me
 
.
Where does it prohibit it and under interpretation of which article?

spoon feed me

Spoon feeding: The role of the Army is clearly defined in the Constitution and nothing beyond it is permissible by law.
 
.
As long as the Iranian Constitution gives them the authority to do what they did, I am fine with it. Can you say the same about the Pakistani "adventure" in Kargil?
So basicly IRGC just stabbed the British in the back constitutionally then, lol, you assuming all that positivity or did you read Iranian constitution?

That's the reason why you call it Pakistani "adventure" in Kargil because Nawaz Sharif told you so, how illuminating is that, lol.

Please try and read the Pakistani Constitution some time. You may find it illuminating. :D
I think you are "illuminated" enough for the whole of PDF dear, and it shows :flame:.
 
.
Spoon feeding: The role of the Army is clearly defined in the Constitution and nothing beyond it is permissible by law.

Please post the article of constitution.

let us all read. Its not a banned book on pdf that you cannot quote it.
 
.
Please post the article of constitution.

let us all read. Its not a banned book on pdf that you cannot quote it.

I am sure you can find it yourself. Please feel free to do so.

So basicly IRGC just stabbed the British in the back constitutionally then, lol, you assuming all that positivity or did you read Iranian constitution?

You are the one who claimed IGRC is just "doing its job". You have to show whether it is according to their Constitution or not. I merely indicated that such legality is the proper test.
 
. . .
I am sure you can find it yourself. Please feel free to do so.



You are the one who claimed IGRC is just "doing its job". You have to show whether it is according to their Constitution or not. I merely indicated that such legality is the proper test.
Running away by quoting part of a question as if it was my statement ?

What about your own claims and judgement?

Now quote the articles of constitution: first the Iranian that you said allows IRGC and then Pakistani that disallows the same.

I think the honorable thing by yourself would be to state that you were just honking random rhetoric based on heresy without any proof.
 
. .
Running away by quoting part of a question as if it was my statement ?

What about your own claims and judgement?

Now quote the articles of constitution: first the Iranian that you said allows IRGC and then Pakistani that disallows the same.

I think the honorable thing by yourself would be to state that you were just honking random rhetoric based on heresy without any proof.

It's okay. The Constitution says what it says very clearly. And the illegality of the Army's actions remains for the world to see and for Pakistan to suffer. Removing your disingenuous feigned ignorance is not my problem. Please carry on as you wish. :D

i told you i Read it thats why i said post the exact Clause which prohibits such actions constitutionally.

morality is least of any concern in the society anyhow

Please see the above.
 
.
The Constitution says what it says very clearly. And the illegality of the Army's actions remains

Under which specific Clause would you weigh your protest for illegality?
 
. .
I have no problem with the illegality of the Army's actions. :D

i thought this was a serious discussion.

please do indulge otherwise make a sexist remark and be At peace.

its a timeless charade of yours and i am just a visitor to your village.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom