What's new

Did Einstein believe Indians were stupid? His diaries suggest so

So This Pakistani has a comprehension problem now? Can you show me where the comparison was with rest of the world? You searched and searched and when reality hit you, the deep insecurities arose.

You still haven't shown me anything about Pakistan's contribution to research and scientific studies.

Some set of people just don't have it in this field.. move on if you are hurt.


The proof is in the pudding as they say.
Pakistan is powerful and advanced enough to make a nation that is more than 7x bigger than us and has abundant access to the world's most advanced weapons systems whilst we are denied this privilege, too weak, pathetic, incapable and powerless to fight us militatily......:azn:

That achievement in itself transcends science, technology etc. Your absolutely correct that certain peoples don't have the ability or intelligence to prosper in the fields of science and technology. The indian racial IQ is even lower than that of Pakistani peoples. Explains why you indians invent, pioneer and create nothing of value yourselves......:azn::

https://iq-research.info/en/average-iq-by-country
 
.
The proof is in the pudding as they say.
Pakistan is powerful and advanced enough to make a nation that is more than 7x bigger than us and has abundant access to the world's most advanced weapons systems whilst we are denied this privilege, too weak, pathetic, incapable and powerless to fight us militatily......:azn:

That achievement in itself transcends science, technology etc. Your absolutely correct that certain peoples don't have the ability or intelligence to prosper in the fields of science and technology. The indian racial IQ is even lower than that of Pakistani peoples. Explains why you indians invent, pioneer and create nothing of value yourselves......:azn::

https://iq-research.info/en/average-iq-by-country
Big words no substance or proof. A typical Pakistan trait. Get real man. Show me the pudding! Not one metric? not one publication? Such a sad state. tsh tsh!
 
.
The proof is in the pudding as they say.
Pakistan is powerful and advanced enough to make a nation that is more than 7x bigger than us and has abundant access to the world's most advanced weapons systems whilst we are denied this privilege, too weak, pathetic, incapable and powerless to fight us militatily......:azn:

That achievement in itself transcends science, technology etc. Your absolutely correct that certain peoples don't have the ability or intelligence to prosper in the fields of science and technology. The indian racial IQ is even lower than that of Pakistani peoples. Explains why you indians invent, pioneer and create nothing of value yourselves......:azn::

https://iq-research.info/en/average-iq-by-country
So, in your opinion, for India to prove her capability, it should attack Pakistan, militarily.

Quite a fucked up world view you got there. :azn:
 
.
To use the favourite Indian expression "there was no Pakistan then" so we did not exist ..... ! If it was anything remotely positive you would be going out of your way to shove that canard "no Pakistan" on us.


And I am 100% sure Einstien did not visit what is now Pakistan. It will have been some hideous dump like Kolkatta or other star of the Ganga which went to inform his comment about Indians.
He never came to India according to the original article. Closest he got was Sri Lanka.
 
.
He never came to India according to the original article. Closest he got was Sri Lanka.
Just like most of the americans I bet he would not even known where India is on world map.

So, in your opinion, for India to prove her capability, it should attack Pakistan, militarily.

Quite a fucked up world view you got there. :azn:
thats a typical pakistani thinking , they still think soviet union collapsed bcos of pakistan!
 
.
He never came to India according to the original article. Closest he got was Sri Lanka.
Then to be honest we can only conclude that his remarks must have been informed by Sinhala/Tamils. Thus we can only rely his statement as referance to Dravidian Indians/Sinhala Lankans. This pretty well clears North Indians from his comment.

I mean it would be entirely stupid to rely on observations of a outsider who has visited only Greece and use them as referance to tarnish all of Europe. Germans or Scandics are Europeans like Greeks but nobody can seriously think that they are same in their attributes. You could use a visit to Greece to make coment about Balkans but that would be about it.

That is why I keep saying anything you read must be 'translated' by using the context which most importantly must include the time. In 1920s India pretty well meant roughly Burma/Sri Lanka/India/Pakistan. But if the observor only went to what is now SL then those comments can only be taken to mean peoples of SL [which includes Tamils of India] .

Not one metric?
These 'metrics'? India loses out to Pakistan. I thrown in 'penis size' as my friend @PAKISTANFOREVER brought to our attention this "little" fact. Looks like ingrates win on IQ, penis size and are far more civilized for 'open shating' in which India is the class act.

  • Lower IQ
  • Smaller Penis size
  • Open defecation
 
.
Gandhi's racism was a norm of the times. Example being that we call Africans "Blacks" which is currently not derogatory, even to Africans. In a few years, it could be regarded as derogatory. The term "Negro" was acceptable in the 1960s but is slanderous currently. Gandhi in his writings referred to Africans in South Africa as "Kaffirs" which is currently a very racist term but was an acceptable term in those days. On the contrary, Gandhi had a very close friendship with Chief Albert Luthuli, one of the founders of the ANC, and when he left South Africa for India, Gandhi impressed upon the Indian indentured laborers there to throw in their support for the Blacks.
Kafir was/is a slur for black south africans.

The islamic term kaffir means "disbeliever or non believer"... unless you think thats racist.
 
.
Big words no substance or proof. A typical Pakistan trait. Get real man. Show me the pudding! Not one metric? not one publication? Such a sad state. tsh tsh!



So where is the evidence of your claims? Let me guess, it comes from the same indian source that vehemently proclaimed that Pakistan would NEVER EVER become a nuclear weapons state with or without Chinese assistance................:lol:
 
.
These 'metrics'? India loses out to Pakistan. I thrown in 'penis size' as my friend @PAKISTANFOREVER brought to our attention this "little" fact. Looks like ingrates win on IQ, penis size and are far more civilized for 'open shating' in which India is the class act.

  • Lower IQ
  • Smaller Penis size
  • Open defecation

1. IQ
2 point of IQ difference.
https://iq-research.info/en/average-iq-by-country

Thats it? Thats all? 82 and 84. Thats all about it? You sadden me Kaptaan Saab! Even fourth grader have more prudence.

Pakistan Avg IQ 84
India & B'desh Avg IQ 82

It proves actually the opposite. Something especially Subcontinental Muslims hate to admit. They are people of subcontinent first and Muslim later :lol: . Genetic and socio economic conditions of entire region are similar and hence yielding similar IQs.

2. Penis size.
How does that matter?
Judging by massive population of India --and China for that matter--, its job is being well done. Big or small.

3. Open Defecation

Now thats a real point to discuss. Good news is that situation is being addressed quite actively in India. Stats are improving drastically and it is a priority for our present government. Don't worry, we will surpass Pakistan in this stat as well. Like we did in life expectancy, literacy, GDP per capita, IMR, MMR etc.
 
.
So, in your opinion, for India to prove her capability, it should attack Pakistan, militarily.

Quite a fucked up world view you got there. :azn:


On the contrary, indians should stop talking and actually come and fight Pakistan. indians have an abnormal and obsessively intense hatred of the Pakistani race and nation. This hatred is unmatched anywhere else in the world. They constantly call for our death and destruction yet NEVER follow it through with actions in the REAL world despite being more than 7x bigger than us and having abundant access to the world's most advanced weapons systems whilst we are denied this privilege. All this proves is that indians are all talk, hot air and cowards. There is a REASON why the indians don't fight Pakistan. Which the indian military high command are very aware of.
 
.
On the contrary, indians should stop talking and actually come and fight Pakistan. indians have an abnormal and obsessively intense hatred of the Pakistani race and nation. This hatred is unmatched anywhere else in the world. They constantly call for our death and destruction yet NEVER follow it through with actions in the REAL world despite being more than 7x bigger than us and having abundant access to the world's most advanced weapons systems whilst we are denied this privilege. All this proves is that indians are all talk, hot air and cowards. There is a REASON why the indians don't fight Pakistan. Which the indian military high command are very aware of.
Why?
 
. .
Then to be honest we can only conclude that his remarks must have been informed by Sinhala/Tamils. Thus we can only rely his statement as referance to Dravidian Indians/Sinhala Lankans. This pretty well clears North Indians from his comment.

I mean it would be entirely stupid to rely on observations of a outsider who has visited only Greece and use them as referance to tarnish all of Europe. Germans or Scandics are Europeans like Greeks but nobody can seriously think that they are same in their attributes. You could use a visit to Greece to make coment about Balkans but that would be about it.

That is why I keep saying anything you read must be 'translated' by using the context which most importantly must include the time. In 1920s India pretty well meant roughly Burma/Sri Lanka/India/Pakistan. But if the observor only went to what is now SL then those comments can only be taken to mean peoples of SL [which includes Tamils of India] .
So the observer experienced the 1920's equivalent of a connecting flight in Sri Lanka. He formed opinions on the locals, and extrapolated this to the subcontinent. In the real world, we know similarities between Sri Lanka and India is limited to the Tamil population and a bit of overlapping culture with the Southern States. This is the line you drew in your post about using context, attributing his comments to those populations included within this line.
But where did Einstein draw the line? Isn't that the whole point? His definition could be as narrow as the people of Ceylon or as broad as South Asia.

Again this doesn't change the reality of the culture being localized to Sri Lanka and South India, but it does shed light on his perception of things at that time. Coming back to context, this was a white European man in the 1920's, educated in the imperial ideology that was the norm in early 20th century Europe. It's not far-fetched to say he formed his opinions before he even boarded the ship. His comments are not about the appearance or physical features of the subcontinent's population, rather it's about their ability to contribute or ability to progress. The European colonizers had a vested interest in keeping their subjects reliant on others and subjugated. It's like visiting a zoo and wondering why the cheetah's are not running fast.
 
. .
2 point of IQ difference.
That is still two point plus. Yes the 'ingrates' end up 2 points plus on the IQ score. So much for the much hyped Indian intelligence. And 2 points can make a world of differance. For instance your DNA and Chimps is 98% the same with only 2% divergence.


upload_2018-6-16_22-6-6.jpeg
 
.
Back
Top Bottom