What's new

Dhaka rejects Taranco’s request to meet president, army chief

BanglaBhoot

RETIRED TTA
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Messages
8,839
Reaction score
5
Country
France
Location
France
Taranco will have meetings with Prime Minister, BNP chairperson, Foreign Minister, CEC and members of diplomatic and civil societies

UN Assistant Secretary General Oscar Fernandez-Taranco is scheduled to arrive in Dhaka today to encourage political leaders to hold non-violent, inclusive and credible elections. Taranco will lead a five-member team, with two officials from the Department of Political Affairs and one senior mediation expert, and will have a series of meetings with major stakeholders during the trip. However, the government has meanwhile rejected the UN envoy’s request to meet President Abdul Hamid and the chief of staff of the Bangladesh Army, Gen Iqbal Karim Bhuiyan. The visit of the UN official two days after the visit of Indian foreign secretary Sujatha Singh is seen as an effort of the international community to reduce tension among the political parties amid the ongoing political confrontation over the arrangements for the polls-time government. During her visit Sujatha Singh stressed the need to hold the elections on time. The Election Commission declared the election schedule last month and the date for submission of nomination papers expired on December 2. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon is sending his deputy to mediate in the political crisis. Taranco will have meetings with Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, BNP chief Khaleda Zia, Foreign Minister AH Mahmood Ali, Chief Election Commissioner Kazi Rakibuddin Ahmad, and members of diplomatic and civil societies. His schedule is prepared in such a manner so that he can convey messages among the leaders. On Saturday, Taranco will meet Awami League General Secretary Syed Ashraful Islam in the afternoon and then the prime minister. After that, he will meet BNP’s acting secretary general Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir and then the BNP chief. In a similar fashion, he will meet Ashraf on Monday morning, Fakhrul in the afternoon and Khaleda in the evening. The next day he will meet the prime minister again before leaving Bangladesh. This is Taranco’s third trip to Dhaka in a year; he visited here last December and May. “I hope his visit will reduce the gap between the two major parties,” former Bangladesh ambassador to US Humayun Kabir told the Dhaka Tribune. He, however, said there was little scope for compromise and that made Taranco’s job difficult. “The two major parties are sticking to their guns and no light is seen at the end of the tunnel,” said another former diplomat, seeking anonymity. If the UN wanted, it could do many things as it had many leverages, he said. A foreign ministry official said the issue of holding non-violent, inclusive and credible elections would dominate the meeting between the prime minister and Taranco. Asked if the UN has the authority to impose any decision on Bangladesh, he said a resolution in the UN General Assembly must be adopted to enforce a UN decision. Meeting with army chief Taranco expressed intention to meet the army chief but the request was declined, said a diplomat. They also wanted to meet the president but it was also not entertained. “There is no point [for him] meeting the army chief to discuss security issue as during the polls time they work under the Election Commission,” the official said. If anybody meets with army officials after meeting with the Election Commission, that would give a wrong message and the government did not want that, he added. “The international community has a tendency to meet with army officials but the government discourages it.” The German ambassador in Dhaka after a meeting with the foreign minister last month said Taranco’s visit was very encouraging. “It comes at the last moment but may be it comes at the right moment.” He expressed hope that both sides would take responsible action before Taranco’s arrival and some major progress could be achieved during his visit. Meanwhile, the UN secretary-general wrote letters to the prime minister and the BNP chief last month, urging them to engage in a dialogue as “time is running out” to find a way to have a credible election. He also made phone calls to both of them in August to encourage them to hold dialogue.

Dhaka rejects Taranco’s request to meet president, army chief | Dhaka Tribune
 
Of-course she does. But like any lowest peasant, she'll age ;)

I have a question here...What is the role of UN here in BD internal affair about holding an election? Is is not something you should be trying to avoid it?..
 
I have a question here...What is the role of UN here in BD internal affair about holding an election? Is is not something you should be trying to avoid it?..

Their role is ensuring credible elections. It is more of a monitoring role.

It has been that way since the 90's. Ever since democracy took took hold in Bangladesh, the political climate had always been volatile. The other is unable to tolerate another should the other win the election and be in power. That is how the cycle was going, and still going. They cannot respect that. Respecting your political opponent is a very important aspect of democracy.

It is worth noting that Bangladesh also participates in UN peacekeeping missions. That way, it generates remittances from there. Bangladesh is also a significant contributor to peacekeeping missions.

Bangladesh's role must be credible in their view. It is a matter of principle that they must be able to ensure peace in their own country should they be keeping the peace in other countries. If not, they won't allow Bangladesh to participate in missions. Much of the money for remittances come from the US as well. Hence, should any coup occur, it must have US consensus.

There was always pre-election violence in Bangladesh. But the current one is unlike any we have witnessed before. It is bloody unique!

I do not favor foreign intervention, but there really aren't any other real options for that matter.

I do want violence-free elections, I really do. But this is a wet-dream for now.
 
Their role is ensuring credible elections. It is more of a monitoring role.

It has been that way since the 90's. Ever since democracy took took hold in Bangladesh, the political climate had always been volatile. The other is unable to tolerate another should the other win the election and be in power. That is how the cycle was going, and still going. They cannot respect that. Respecting your political opponent is a very important aspect of democracy.

It is worth noting that Bangladesh also participates in UN peacekeeping missions. That way, it generates remittances from there. Bangladesh is also a significant contributor to peacekeeping missions.

Bangladesh's role must be credible in their view. It is a matter of principle that they must be able to ensure peace in their own country should they be keeping the peace in other countries. If not, they won't allow Bangladesh to participate in missions. Much of the money for remittances come from the US as well. Hence, should any coup occur, it must have US consensus.

There was always pre-election violence in Bangladesh. But the current one is unlike any we have witnessed before. It is bloody unique!

I do not favor foreign intervention, but there really aren't any other real options for that matter.

I do want violence-free elections, I really do. But this is a wet-dream for now.


Of course....to have a free and fair election there is always a lot of onus is on the ruling party....Otherwise..the political space will be limited for all parties to fight an election.
 
First of all heading "Dhaka rejects" is grossly misleading because it is Awami League regime that is rejecting while Bangladesh has been mis represented.

Info about Dhaka Tribune
Dhaka tribune run by Zafar Sobhan, ex daily star assistant editor and son of Rehman Sobhan and nephew of Farooq Sobhan. All of Sobhan family is loyal indian dalal in Bangladesh. Just see their preaching on indian transit and other indian interest, things will be clear.

About the topic of Awami League rejection of UN meeting, that will trigger UN review on how it will engage Bangladesh forces in peace keeping mission. But even more important, Awami League expanded its repressive act over army as well. Lets see how much domesticated army had become?
 
Last edited:
Of course....to have a free and fair election there is always a lot of onus is on the ruling party....Otherwise..the political space will be limited for all parties to fight an election.

Well, you are not wrong.

This is the reality:
Hasina has formed an all-party government in which the 18-party opposition would not join. And HM Ershad's party are not going to participate in the scheduled elections.

So where does that leave us? Is there any such thing as an one-party election? Is that even supposed to make any sense?

It is clear to everyone in Bangladesh that she is misusing power to eliminate her political opponents.

No one would tolerate a dictator in Bangladesh. Not even the international community. Save one :D

Elections are only part of a democracy.
 
Last edited:
Lets see the positives in all these indo-awami dalali. The new generation who didn't saw bakshal just experienced what out fore-fathers experienced . They saw the true face of Hasina and AL and our good friend India left no stone unturned to prove that AL is an inherent Indian proxy meant to hand over BD's soverignity to India and make BD a cannon fodder for Indian regional hegemonic ambitions. These are all good for the long run IMO though India will always come up with new proxies after AL is ousted.
 
Well, you are not wrong.

This is the reality:
Hasina has formed an all-party government in which the 18-party opposition would not join. And HM Ershad's party are not going to participate in the scheduled elections.

So where does that leave us? Is there any such thing as an one-party election? Is that even supposed to make any sense?

It is clear to everyone in Bangladesh that she is misusing power to eliminate her political opponents.

No one would tolerate a dictator in Bangladesh. Not even the international community. Save one :D

Elections are only part of a democracy.

Agreed....As i said, Ruling party should try its best to make sure every one is coming on board...Otherwise..there is nothing called "election".....But again if she is asking for 18 party GOV why they oppn is not joining? Is it not what opposition is expected for?....
 
Back
Top Bottom