truthseer
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2011
- Messages
- 4,439
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Democracy is a system of government that is in vogue in most parts of the world, and even in Pakistan. However, there are many, many people who are against it in this country. Foremost among them is Mr.Zaid Hamid, a supposed patriot who seems to be either blatantly stupid or a very cunning man.
Let us see and analyze one of his quotes, which sadly, reflects the mindset of the people here.
"Democracy is Shirk"
Firstly, let us analyze what Shirk is in the first place. Shirk is to associate anyone or to associate any property of the Almighty ALLAH with a person, thing or an object. Now the people who say this believe that by allowing a set of people to rule over us, by the choice of the people and pass legislation, we are associating the properties of ALLAh with them (Astaghfirullah). However, this is simply not true. Firstly, ALLAH has allowed us the systems of Qiyas and Ijma. While Qiyas depends on analogy with the Quran, what about Ijma? As long as something is not forbidden in Islam, or explicity allowed, the scholars are allowed to pass judgement.
If we apply the same definition, then should this also not be Shirk? But of course, it is not. This is because we do not take these Lawmakers as ALLAH, and we have no reason to. It is utterly ridiculous to believe otherwise.
Yet, sadly most people here are misled by the nonsense fed to them by pseudo-intellectuals, which brings us to the main topic. Can democracy ever flourish here? Or is doomed to fail?
Personally speaking, Democracy has Dictatorship beat. Many times, you will hear people asking, "Is dictatorship better than a weak democracy?" Such is its power that one doesn't think the other way around. A strong democracy is much better than a strong dictatorship? So should we not bear with the weak one we have now until it flourishes? Let us suppose PML-N wins the elections this time. The next time, if no military takeover takes place, the Awaam will know that both the major parties are complete failures and they shall not vote blindly.
So far, this has been prevented by takeovers. 10 years of democracy could, I am sure, lead to the Awaam finally being able to stand up and think for itself. Is that not what would make it a success?
What is needed?
There are many things that are needed. Firstly, we need the army to not take over again. Kiyani has done a fabulous job in this regard, and has shown patience with democracy, not taking over the government despite huge pressure.
Further, we require our media to show some support to the system instead of whinging on and on about small issues. These issues will gradually disappear as democracy gets further influence. The people can then change the system
So what do you think? Indians, Pakistanis alike, can democracy grow here? It should, it definitely should but will it?
Tagging a few non-troll people here: @Aeronaut @Leader @HYPOKRAIT @Marshmallow @Talon (This will get you out of Naswaristan ) @Awesome
(Finally out of Naswaristan, nice new tag name for KRAIT too)
Let us see and analyze one of his quotes, which sadly, reflects the mindset of the people here.
"Democracy is Shirk"
Firstly, let us analyze what Shirk is in the first place. Shirk is to associate anyone or to associate any property of the Almighty ALLAH with a person, thing or an object. Now the people who say this believe that by allowing a set of people to rule over us, by the choice of the people and pass legislation, we are associating the properties of ALLAh with them (Astaghfirullah). However, this is simply not true. Firstly, ALLAH has allowed us the systems of Qiyas and Ijma. While Qiyas depends on analogy with the Quran, what about Ijma? As long as something is not forbidden in Islam, or explicity allowed, the scholars are allowed to pass judgement.
If we apply the same definition, then should this also not be Shirk? But of course, it is not. This is because we do not take these Lawmakers as ALLAH, and we have no reason to. It is utterly ridiculous to believe otherwise.
Yet, sadly most people here are misled by the nonsense fed to them by pseudo-intellectuals, which brings us to the main topic. Can democracy ever flourish here? Or is doomed to fail?
Personally speaking, Democracy has Dictatorship beat. Many times, you will hear people asking, "Is dictatorship better than a weak democracy?" Such is its power that one doesn't think the other way around. A strong democracy is much better than a strong dictatorship? So should we not bear with the weak one we have now until it flourishes? Let us suppose PML-N wins the elections this time. The next time, if no military takeover takes place, the Awaam will know that both the major parties are complete failures and they shall not vote blindly.
So far, this has been prevented by takeovers. 10 years of democracy could, I am sure, lead to the Awaam finally being able to stand up and think for itself. Is that not what would make it a success?
What is needed?
There are many things that are needed. Firstly, we need the army to not take over again. Kiyani has done a fabulous job in this regard, and has shown patience with democracy, not taking over the government despite huge pressure.
Further, we require our media to show some support to the system instead of whinging on and on about small issues. These issues will gradually disappear as democracy gets further influence. The people can then change the system
So what do you think? Indians, Pakistanis alike, can democracy grow here? It should, it definitely should but will it?
Tagging a few non-troll people here: @Aeronaut @Leader @HYPOKRAIT @Marshmallow @Talon (This will get you out of Naswaristan ) @Awesome
(Finally out of Naswaristan, nice new tag name for KRAIT too)
Last edited by a moderator: