What's new

Dear India, your policy on Pakistan is utterly obsolete

but 99% pakistanies (be it genral publick , elite or security establishment) think india elections are lost or won on hate campain against pakistan ...... donno weather u have seen it but some years back there was a cerial called "ye jo hai zindagi" with naveen nischal and shekhar suman there a new house mais kept always dreaming about the naveen nischals daughters boyfriend will leave naveens daughter as the boyfriend said that the maid is so "loveable" point is in short that pakistanies think all the world (specialli of hindus in india) resolve around hate for pios people of pakistan and pakistan land in perticular deu to there "strategick location " :haha:
are you drunk or what? all spelling mistakes....no logic....when was naveen nischal or shekar suman in "yeh jo hai zindagi". They were both together in "Dekh Bhai Dekh"...
 
. .
Talks weren't going to produce anything, Modi realized that his hard policy wasn't working, thus the reason after all that time he accepted to hold talks.
He invited Nawar the day he was sworn in and you claiming modi realized his hard policy will not work? He adapted that policy when PA opened their guns to infiltrate India. He still provided a platform to test Pakistan's seriousness but Pakistan as usual again disappointed.

Take any as an example. Hafiz Saeed is a god damn social worker, i would suggest Indian government to make whatever evidence they have against him, except for his speeches, because India has many similar personals, public..........
He has red corner notice against him. He has been declared international terrorists. So no matter how many evidences are going to be provided you guys have to behave like ostriches with your heads in the sand.

PA has a stance on Kashmir issue, GOI is not willing to talk on the issue, how can we be blamed? our position is bold enough, you are the one with no position.
That mean you are more rigid as you have bold stance and we more flexible as we have none. Then how come you claiming Modi does not compromise. You decide first, is Modi with no stance or with hard stance..Once you have decided you can come back and put forward your mind clearly.
 
.
He invited Nawar the day he was sworn in and you claiming modi realized his hard policy will not work?
Photo session, drama.
He adapted that policy when PA opened their guns to infiltrate India
Most stupidest of logic's applied, it was India who was violating the treaty not Pakistan. PA is and was busy in other side of the border, with half our army focusing on that side, why would PA risk going to war with India, knowing it is in a weaker situation-simple analysis.
He has red corner notice against him. He has been declared international terrorists. So no matter how many evidences are going to be provided you guys have to behave like ostriches with your heads in the sand.
Note: before Modi became a PM US wasn't issuing him a Visa, reason figure out.... Evidence should be publicized, it there is any.
That mean you are more rigid as you have bold stance and we more flexible as we have none. Then how come you claiming Modi does not compromise. You decide first, is Modi with no stance or with hard stance..Once you have decided you can come back and put forward your mind clearly.
No stance on Kashmir issue is a hard-stance, no stance means not willing to talk, oppressing, not giving a shit what locals think.
 
.
Photo session, drama.
So what every Pakistan does is the only correct way to do the things. Good thinking...with this way nothing is gonna achieved.

Most stupidest of logic's applied, it was India who was violating the treaty not Pakistan. PA is and was busy in other side of the border, with half our army focusing on that side, why would PA risk going to war with India, knowing it is in a weaker situation-simple analysis.
You really trying to be that innocent or plain dumb? Pakistan Army cannot be trusted , it is plain simple. No one trusts PA in the whole world leave India. Your PA was saying there was no OBL but he was found right under PA nose. There are enough reports present and coming that PA was aware of him and infact supported him. So PA has every reason to spread lies and invoke the firing. This time is more highlighted as we have tough government who is responding to PA misadventures.

Note: before Modi became a PM US wasn't issuing him a Visa, reason figure out.... Evidence should be publicized, it there is any.
We are talking about UN here. not one country. Also for US, the inputs which was provided to her by US ambassador in India was highly political motivated. That is the reason she was released from the services immediately after Modi become PM.

No stance on Kashmir issue is a hard-stance, no stance means not willing to talk, oppressing, not giving a shit what locals think.
Thats your misinterpretation. We dont care about it if you want to look at every talking through the prism of Kashmir. Nothing gonna happen. Even a child knows if he has to go to 10th floor, you have to take first step. You can quicken it by taking the elevator but again you need to pass all other floors. the same is with Kashmir. You have to take baby steps, jumping str8 to kashmir is not going to help as we have been doing that since long with no result.
 
.
You really trying to be that innocent or plain dumb? Pakistan Army cannot be trusted , it is plain simple.
That is for you to say.
No one trusts PA in the whole world leave India.
Please, do not exaggerate from next time.
Your PA was saying there was no OBL but he was found right under PA nose.
Then more credible and recent report suggest PA gave intelligence on him too.
I wish not to waste my time anymore. Ciao
 
.
Best you could come up with, lol.
So who according to you is most charismatic leader in South Asia in this era?

Modi is a hard liner, especially towards Pakistan, one of those people who cannot swallow Pakistan, his election campaign was anti-Pakistan. In my opinion, this is not helping anyone. India needs better leadership, in time you will understand.

Mr. Vajpaye was there for 5yrs and then Mr. Singh was there for 10years and what was result?
Modi's election campaign was Economic development.
No one would have given him a shit if his campaign would have been anything other than Economic Development. India as of now has the best leadership and unless some major changes happen in domestic politics, economy or at security level, I see Modi holding that seat for atleast 10yrs. Now weather you like it or not, Indians have elected him as PM and now entire world recognise him as a charismatic leader who has vision and power to direct Indian growth wheel. The day when you will get a charasmatic leader like Modi in Pakistan, you will yourself understand how a strong leader changes self esteem of nation.

Pakistan should now stop expecting that Indians will any more continue the soft stand. Indian Govt can portray itself soft using diplomatic way, but overall its not going to be that easy for Pakistan, where it could do things as per its wish and get away.

As they say water has flown over the head and majority of Indians now feel that Pakistan is taking undue benefits of India's Soft Stand.




c078f660ee0dc8d95941c4180893e525.jpg

q7iz2.jpg
 
.
Mr. Vajpaye was there for 5yrs and then Mr. Singh was there for 10years and what was result?
Modi's election campaign was Economic development.
No one would have given him a shit if his campaign would have been anything other than Economic Development. India as of now has the best leadership and unless some major changes happen in domestic politics, economy or at security level, I see Modi holding that seat for atleast 10yrs. Now weather you like it or not, Indians have elected him as PM and now entire world recognise him as a charismatic leader who has vision and power to direct Indian growth wheel. The day when you will get a charasmatic leader like Modi in Pakistan, you will yourself understand how a strong leader changes self esteem of nation.

Pakistan should now stop expecting that Indians will any more continue the soft stand. Indian Govt can portray itself soft using diplomatic way, but overall its not going to be that easy for Pakistan, where it could do things as per its wish and get away.

As they say water has flown over the head and majority of Indians now feel that Pakistan is taking undue benefits of India's Soft Stand.
Meray piyarey bhain, i do have a good reply but the thing is debate is never ending, no point in continuing, ciao sister( i hope).

@Viny , try to understand i have had these face-offs many times.
 
.
Photo session, drama.
Nawaz is not a Miss Universe or Some other pageant winner so that Modi would like to have him as a glamour.
Probably diplomacy norms and process is over your head.

Most stupidest of logic's applied, it was India who was violating the treaty not Pakistan. PA is and was busy in other side of the border, with half our army focusing on that side, why would PA risk going to war with India, knowing it is in a weaker situation-simple analysis.

When India had a peace in Kashmir from last few years, why would India fire shells at Pakistan. We are not interested in playing duck hunt game. Its been known Pakisthan attacks Indian side to give cover fire and to arrange secure passage for militants. Its been old technique and now forces knows it and does a proper response to counter it.


Note: before Modi became a PM US wasn't issuing him a Visa, reason figure out.... Evidence should be publicized, it there is any.

And President of same US not only invited Modi, but also visited India when Modi became PM and neighbors where still aspiring ...reason figure out....Evidence should be publicized..i am sure there are many...

No stance on Kashmir issue is a hard-stance, no stance means not willing to talk, oppressing, not giving a shit what locals think.

Its just not giving a shit to what Pakistan thinks.
 
.
Yes, that is why a lot of them spend hours upon hours every day on Pakistani forums, replying on almost every post related to Pakistan to tell us that they don't care about Pakistan.

Right.... :lol:

Use your brain Mr.
Those Indians in here represents middle class .Most of them are youths.
Common people only cares about their life .
 
.
Modi is the reason for what is happening on our borders.

And who was the reason for what was happening on our border before Modi came to power?

as Modi(being a hard-liner) talk will not go forward.

When was the last time we achieved something out of 'talk'?

Hafiz Saeed is a god damn social worker

This attitude is one of the reasons why talk is useless.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom