sparklingway
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 12, 2009
- Messages
- 3,878
- Reaction score
- 0
Zarco, FIA official are partners in Rs 700 million scam
Saturday, April 10, 2010
By Abdul Sattar Khan
LAHORE: The re-investigation of Zarco Exchange Company by the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), which shifted blame of the flight of capital amounting up to Rs700 million from the Chief Executive of Zarco Syed Lakhat-e-Husnain, to its employees, became possible because a senior most director of the FIA happened to be the partner of the same Exchange Company, The News has learnt reliably.
Information acquired by this scribe shows that Impex Trading Ltd UK is a company owned by PSP officer Chaudhry Sajjad Ahmeds brother, who is posted as Director Technical Wing in the FIA Headquarter, as its Master Agent in the United Kingdom. Secondly Sunrise Associates, which is owned by Sajjad Ahmeds nephew, is a franchise of Zarco Exchange Company in Lalamusa, Pakistan.
Scrutiny of the record revealed that Ch Sajjad Ahmed Director FIA Technical Wing played a key role in finalizing the master agent deal and franchise agreements with Chief Executive Zarco Lakhat-e-Husnain.
When the FIA arrested the owner and other accused of Zarco in August last year, Sunrise Associates filed a claim with the FIA to ensure Zarco paid back the money, which the management had usurped. On one hand Ch Sajjad Ahmed played his role ensuring re-investigation in Zarco case, which resulted in projecting the principal accused Lakhat-e-Husnain as innocent, while on the other Sunrise Association, at the time of filing claim with the FIA categorically held Lakhat-e-Husnain responsible for all the mess stating: We request you to enforce Zarco Exchange Company to pay back the usurped money by Lakhat-e-Husnain, who is holding 99.99 per cent shares in the company.
Details containing in eleven emails between Zarco management and Ch Sajjad Ahmed on the issue of approving rights of Master Agent of Zarco to Impex Trading Ltd UK as well as approving franchise to Sunrise Associates in Lalamusa (Pakistan) clearly revealed the level of interest shown by both the sides to become associates.
Seven emails were in context with franchise deal with Zarco while four emails were exchanged to finalize the deal for availing master agency of Zarco in UK. In one such email dated 5th May 2007 Lakhat-e-Husnain instructed his Head of Compliance Shahid Butt to expedite the approval of a franchise of Ch Sajjad Ahmed in Lalamusa. It reads, The matter as extremely important as his brother ex-minister Ch Ejaz Ahmed has really done him great favour during his recent trip to UK where his relative heading a bank. I really need deadline and I will request you to please use your personal influence to get this done.
The same day Butt wrote to Lakhat informing him that he was already pursuing the matter vigorously. On 1st June 2007 Butt wrote to Ch Ejaz Ahmed, Sajjads brother, informing him after vigorous persuasion and as advised by our worthy CEO we have now succeeded to obtain State Bank of Pakistan permission to enter into franchise agreement with Sunrise Associates Lalamusa.
Finally, on June 23rd 2007 franchise agreement between Sunrise Associates and Zarco came into effect.
Lakhat instructed Mubashar Hayat, Company Secretary Zarco on 15th September 2007 to expedite the matter, as this is important with reference to our strategy to appoint them as our master agent in UK. Finally, on 12th October 2007, Mohammad Kamran head of UK Zarco operations while giving the reference of their meeting with Ch Sajjad on October 11 submitted important documents, which subsequently resulted in reaching an agreement with Impex Trading. The profit sharing ratio (financial feasibility retail) between Zarco and Impex Trading would be 45 per cent going to Zarco and 55 per cent to Impex. The 55 per cent profit of Impex was further divided with 25 per cent going to Impex (Master Agent) while the remainder 75 per cent was further divided into their sub agents in UK.
On 20th August 2008, Ch Sajjad once again emailed Shahid Butt to tell him about his posting as Director FIA HQ Islamabad and his telephone numbers were 9251926, 9261194. Five days later Lakhat instructed Butt to congratulate him writing, I will also call him to congratulate him, please advise his cell number.
It had been only after two years that Ch Sajjad had the chance to return Lakhats favours when he became DG FIA during March 7, 2010 to March 20, 2010 in absence of the incumbent DG Zafarullah Khan. Ironically the re investigation of Zarco case, which conveniently shifted the blame to Mubashar Hayyat and other employees of Zarco, was carried out during 14th March to 18th March.
DG FIA Zafarullah Khan, under unexplained circumstances tried to protect Ch Sajjad when it was time to fill para-wise comments before Lahore High Court by stating, It is further submitted for the sake of clarity that DIG Ch Sajjad Ahmed is posted as Director Technical in FIA HQ, having no concern whatsoever with the proceedings of the cases. The said officer, however, looked after the work of DG FIA being the senior most official available at the station, during my visit abroad from 7-3-2010 to 20-3-2010 and he did not issue any direction in Zarco cases.
Contrary to this statement of DG FIA Zafarullah, the report prepared by Niamat Ali, Inspector FIA (SIU), who was associated with the re-investigation under the supervision of Director SIU Liaqat Saleemi, revealed that a letter dated 22-3-2010 issued by Ch Sajjad Ahmad, which was duly received in SIU, with the directions to accelerate probe to the specific allegations made by the petitioner Mrs Kausar Bano.
Inspector Niamat Ali in the same letter revealed, In the light of directions received from Ch Sajjad Ahmed, investigations of the case is being carried out within the parameters of task entrusted to SIU and grievances of petitioner Kausar Bano is being looked into as per law. This shows that Ch Sajjad Ahmed became instrumental to take care of the specific allegations leveled principal accused Lakhats wife. This also shows that Ch Sajjad wanted to complete the task during his tenure as DG FIA to re-structure the investigation.
Despite repeated attempts on the part of this scribe, Ch Sajjad Ahmed was not available for comment despite repeated promises for a call back.
Saturday, April 10, 2010
By Abdul Sattar Khan
LAHORE: The re-investigation of Zarco Exchange Company by the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), which shifted blame of the flight of capital amounting up to Rs700 million from the Chief Executive of Zarco Syed Lakhat-e-Husnain, to its employees, became possible because a senior most director of the FIA happened to be the partner of the same Exchange Company, The News has learnt reliably.
Information acquired by this scribe shows that Impex Trading Ltd UK is a company owned by PSP officer Chaudhry Sajjad Ahmeds brother, who is posted as Director Technical Wing in the FIA Headquarter, as its Master Agent in the United Kingdom. Secondly Sunrise Associates, which is owned by Sajjad Ahmeds nephew, is a franchise of Zarco Exchange Company in Lalamusa, Pakistan.
Scrutiny of the record revealed that Ch Sajjad Ahmed Director FIA Technical Wing played a key role in finalizing the master agent deal and franchise agreements with Chief Executive Zarco Lakhat-e-Husnain.
When the FIA arrested the owner and other accused of Zarco in August last year, Sunrise Associates filed a claim with the FIA to ensure Zarco paid back the money, which the management had usurped. On one hand Ch Sajjad Ahmed played his role ensuring re-investigation in Zarco case, which resulted in projecting the principal accused Lakhat-e-Husnain as innocent, while on the other Sunrise Association, at the time of filing claim with the FIA categorically held Lakhat-e-Husnain responsible for all the mess stating: We request you to enforce Zarco Exchange Company to pay back the usurped money by Lakhat-e-Husnain, who is holding 99.99 per cent shares in the company.
Details containing in eleven emails between Zarco management and Ch Sajjad Ahmed on the issue of approving rights of Master Agent of Zarco to Impex Trading Ltd UK as well as approving franchise to Sunrise Associates in Lalamusa (Pakistan) clearly revealed the level of interest shown by both the sides to become associates.
Seven emails were in context with franchise deal with Zarco while four emails were exchanged to finalize the deal for availing master agency of Zarco in UK. In one such email dated 5th May 2007 Lakhat-e-Husnain instructed his Head of Compliance Shahid Butt to expedite the approval of a franchise of Ch Sajjad Ahmed in Lalamusa. It reads, The matter as extremely important as his brother ex-minister Ch Ejaz Ahmed has really done him great favour during his recent trip to UK where his relative heading a bank. I really need deadline and I will request you to please use your personal influence to get this done.
The same day Butt wrote to Lakhat informing him that he was already pursuing the matter vigorously. On 1st June 2007 Butt wrote to Ch Ejaz Ahmed, Sajjads brother, informing him after vigorous persuasion and as advised by our worthy CEO we have now succeeded to obtain State Bank of Pakistan permission to enter into franchise agreement with Sunrise Associates Lalamusa.
Finally, on June 23rd 2007 franchise agreement between Sunrise Associates and Zarco came into effect.
Lakhat instructed Mubashar Hayat, Company Secretary Zarco on 15th September 2007 to expedite the matter, as this is important with reference to our strategy to appoint them as our master agent in UK. Finally, on 12th October 2007, Mohammad Kamran head of UK Zarco operations while giving the reference of their meeting with Ch Sajjad on October 11 submitted important documents, which subsequently resulted in reaching an agreement with Impex Trading. The profit sharing ratio (financial feasibility retail) between Zarco and Impex Trading would be 45 per cent going to Zarco and 55 per cent to Impex. The 55 per cent profit of Impex was further divided with 25 per cent going to Impex (Master Agent) while the remainder 75 per cent was further divided into their sub agents in UK.
On 20th August 2008, Ch Sajjad once again emailed Shahid Butt to tell him about his posting as Director FIA HQ Islamabad and his telephone numbers were 9251926, 9261194. Five days later Lakhat instructed Butt to congratulate him writing, I will also call him to congratulate him, please advise his cell number.
It had been only after two years that Ch Sajjad had the chance to return Lakhats favours when he became DG FIA during March 7, 2010 to March 20, 2010 in absence of the incumbent DG Zafarullah Khan. Ironically the re investigation of Zarco case, which conveniently shifted the blame to Mubashar Hayyat and other employees of Zarco, was carried out during 14th March to 18th March.
DG FIA Zafarullah Khan, under unexplained circumstances tried to protect Ch Sajjad when it was time to fill para-wise comments before Lahore High Court by stating, It is further submitted for the sake of clarity that DIG Ch Sajjad Ahmed is posted as Director Technical in FIA HQ, having no concern whatsoever with the proceedings of the cases. The said officer, however, looked after the work of DG FIA being the senior most official available at the station, during my visit abroad from 7-3-2010 to 20-3-2010 and he did not issue any direction in Zarco cases.
Contrary to this statement of DG FIA Zafarullah, the report prepared by Niamat Ali, Inspector FIA (SIU), who was associated with the re-investigation under the supervision of Director SIU Liaqat Saleemi, revealed that a letter dated 22-3-2010 issued by Ch Sajjad Ahmad, which was duly received in SIU, with the directions to accelerate probe to the specific allegations made by the petitioner Mrs Kausar Bano.
Inspector Niamat Ali in the same letter revealed, In the light of directions received from Ch Sajjad Ahmed, investigations of the case is being carried out within the parameters of task entrusted to SIU and grievances of petitioner Kausar Bano is being looked into as per law. This shows that Ch Sajjad Ahmed became instrumental to take care of the specific allegations leveled principal accused Lakhats wife. This also shows that Ch Sajjad wanted to complete the task during his tenure as DG FIA to re-structure the investigation.
Despite repeated attempts on the part of this scribe, Ch Sajjad Ahmed was not available for comment despite repeated promises for a call back.