What's new

Computers to surpass human intelligence by 2030: Religious Perspectives

Flintlock

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
6,176
Reaction score
0
Computers 'to match human brains by 2030'

REUTERS/Peter Morgan

Computing has come a long way since the first time a computer beat a reigning world champion at chess, in Garry Kasparov's 1996 contest against IBM super computer Deep Blue.

By Steve Connor, Science Editor in Boston
Saturday, 16 February 2008

Computer power will match the intelligence of human beings within the next 20 years because of the accelerating speed at which technology is advancing, according to a leading scientific "futurologist".

There will be 32 times more technical progress during the next half century than there was in the entire 20th century, and one of the outcomes is that artificial intelligence could be on a par with human intellect by the 2020s, said the American computer guru Ray Kurzweil.

Machines will rapidly overtake humans in their intellectual abilities and will soon be able to solve some of the most intractable problems of the 21st century, said Dr Kurzweil, one of 18 maverick thinkers chosen to identify the greatest technological challenges facing humanity.

Dr Kurzweil is considered one of the most radical figures in the field of technological prediction. His credentials stem from being a pioneer in various fields of computing, such as optical character recognition – the technology behind CDs – and automatic speech recognition by machine.

His address yesterday to the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) portrayed a future where machine intelligence will far surpass that of the human brain as they learn how to communicate, teach and replicate among themselves.

Central to his thesis is the idea that silicon-based technology follows the "law of accelerating returns". The computer chip, for instance, has doubled in power every two years for the past half century, which has led to an ever- accelerating progression – and miniaturisation – in all chip-based technologies.

Dr Kurzweil told the annual meeting of the AAAS in Boston: "The paradigm shift rate is now doubling every decade, so the next half century will see 32 times more technical progress than the last half century. Computation, communication, biological technologies – for example, DNA sequencing – brain scanning, knowledge of the human brain, and human knowledge in general are all accelerating at an ever-faster pace, generally doubling price-performance, capacity and bandwidth every year."

Computers have so far been based on two-dimensional chips made from silicon, but there are developments already well advanced to make three-dimensional chips with vastly improved performances, and even to construct them out of biological molecules that can be miniaturised even more than metal-based computer chips.

"Three-dimensional, molecular computing will provide the hardware for human-level 'strong artificial intelligence' by the 2020s. The more important software insights will be gained in part from the reverse engineering of the human brain, a process well under way. Already, two dozen regions of the human brain have been modelled and simulated," he said.

Although the brain cannot match computers in terms of the straight storage and retrieval of information, it has an unrivalled capacity of associating different strands of information, to look ahead and plan, as well as performing the imaginative creativity that is at the heart of human existence. But Dr Kurzweil is one of several computer scientists who believe that computers are well on the way to creating a "post-human" world where a second, intelligent entity exists alongside people.

"Once non-biological intelligence matches the range and subtlety of human intelligence, it will necessarily soar past it because of the continuing acceleration of information-based technologies, as well as the ability of machines to instantly share their knowledge," Dr Kurzweil said.

"We are understanding disease and ageing processes as information processes, and are gaining the tools to reprogramme them. RNA interference, for example, allows us to turn selected genes off, and new forms of gene therapy are enabling us to effectively add new genes. Within two decades, we will be in a position to stop and reverse the progression of disease and ageing resulting in dramatic gains in health and longevity," he added.

Rise of the machines

The history of "artificial" intelligence goes back to classical times, although of course it was never called by that name. The Greek myths of Hephaestus and Pygmalion incorporate the idea of intelligent machines that take on human form. We would call them robots.

Mary Shelley took up the theme of man trying to create a living image of himself in her story of Frankenstein's monster, but the word "robot" did not enter the English language until Karel Capek's 1923 play R.U.R., which stood for Rossum's Universal Robots. The idea of a machine being able to match the intelligence of humans was explored in the 1940s by the great English mathematician Alan Turing, below, who devised his test of artificial intelligence. In a seminal scientific paper published in 1950, Turing came up with a practical solution to the problem – the Turing test. Turing said that a machine would be deemed to have passed the test if human beings could interact with it as they would with another person.

The term "artificial intelligence" (AI) was first coined by the computer scientist John McCarthy in 1956, and the concept was explored in the 1950s and 1960s by the likes of Marvin Minksy, of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

The science fiction writer Arthur C Clarke drew on the concept of AI in his book 2001: A Space Odyssey, which featured an intelligent computer called HAL that was an intellectual match for man.

By the mid-1970s the financial backers of the AI industry became disillusioned over its inability to match the human brain. But then, on 11 May 1997, the IBM computer Deep Blue became the first machine to beat a reigning world chess champion. This was soon followed by other "intelligent" feats such as the robot car driver which drove 131 miles along an unrehearsed desert trail.

AI, portrayed in films such as Blade Runner and The Terminator, was on a roll again.

Computers 'to match human brains by 2030' - News, Gadgets & Tech - Independent.co.uk
 
.
How do you find that? Scary? Blasphemous?

How does one reconcile such a thing with religious views? Will intelligent computers be judged by god? Will they go to heaven and hell?

Can man indeed surpass god's creation?
 
.
If one does believe in God, then I don't think this is comparable to God creating us. We are about to create something which is smarter than us (not necessarily better). God made us, but he is still smarter than us.

And without human brain power, which God created, these computers would not have been possible, so one could say this is really happening through Gods approval.
 
.
^^^
If everything happened with the approval of god, then why would religious people get offended by anything?
 
.
^^^
If everything happened with the approval of god, then why would religious people get offended by anything?
God is supreme...end it there. God essentially created weapons, war and waste as much as peace, love and birth. However God also provided humanity with the ability to think on its own and the rule of being held accountable to one's own actions. It is not as if 'everything' was separate of God, that God would 'approve' of it...but rather created by God and made available for humanity to use at its own discretion.
 
.
God is supreme...end it there. God essentially created weapons, war and waste as much as peace, love and birth. However God also provided humanity with the ability to think on its own and the rule of being held accountable to one's own actions. It is not as if 'everything' was separate of God, that God would 'approve' of it...but rather created by God and made available for humanity to use at its own discretion.

But if a man-made creation came into being, capable of being everything a human can be, and doing everything a human can do, will it be judged by god's laws?
 
.
But if a man-made creation came into being, capable of being everything a human can be, and doing everything a human can do, will it be judged by god's laws?
Depends...one would argue that human clones are man-made, yet they would definitely be accorded a soul as they are 'born' into the world. By according feelings and conscious into a computer (A.I), one is definitely asking for the soul factor as well...if that is the case, then it can be judged by God. However the feelings and conscious is a very subjective issue...what if an A.I was based on the conscious of a human developer...in that case the human would have to answer for the A.I's actions. In Islam...parents are very much accountable to God for the sins of their teenage to adult children.
 
.
^^^
If everything happened with the approval of god, then why would religious people get offended by anything?

People are stupid. A minority are not. Perhaps in a few hundred years the average person will be smart enough to not flip out over every little cartoon or teddy bear.

God is supreme...end it there. God essentially created weapons, war and waste as much as peace, love and birth. However God also provided humanity with the ability to think on its own and the rule of being held accountable to one's own actions. It is not as if 'everything' was separate of God, that God would 'approve' of it...but rather created by God and made available for humanity to use at its own discretion.

You are stating that as fact. Where is your proof for God?

But if a man-made creation came into being, capable of being everything a human can be, and doing everything a human can do, will it be judged by god's laws?

A man made machine, no matter how smart, will not have a soul. So when it "dies" it will simply cease existing. This is the view you will get from a religious person, not that I necessarily believe it. I'm agnostic.
 
.
You are stating that as fact. Where is your proof for God?

A man made machine, no matter how smart, will not have a soul. So when it "dies" it will simply cease existing. This is the view you will get from a religious person, not that I necessarily believe it. I'm agnostic.
My proof of God lies between the cosmological and supreme engineer theory for the phlisophical folk...from my own, I argue the perfection of natural life as my personal proof. You cannot 'engineer' effeciency out of random...it takes calculation, programming and development to properly enter the road of perfection. Now perfection itself is a relative term in that our world we see it as foreseen goals and accomplishments...whereas God could see it as something else. Nonetheless in both cases a random build up based on equations that 'appear' (unexplained how) does not do anything except lead back to..."what caused", "why caused" and "how caused"...and of course "where is start?".

A man made machine that is "smart" could be a calculator or system-organizer...we are actually referring to the possibility of 'artificial intelligence'. With A.I. you are storing the powers of autonomous decision and conscious into the machine..once conscious is in place and succesfully proven to exist - then a soul has been given to the A.I.

However we are referring as to the A.I. being born...move into the issue of "forcing the A.I. to act & think a certain pattern based on the creator or consensual personality" - then you are looking at the person/creator of that system being held accountable. Not on the basis of how that system acts, but how it was forced to act and essentially designed as a tool to fulfil a certain cause.
 
.
However we are referring as to the A.I. being born...move into the issue of "forcing the A.I. to act & think a certain pattern based on the creator or consensual personality" - then you are looking at the person/creator of that system being held accountable. Not on the basis of how that system acts, but how it was forced to act and essentially designed as a tool to fulfil a certain cause.

With artificial intelligence, computers won't just act based on the creator's wishes. It will be capable of independent decision making and eventually even self awareness.

In such circumstances, if a computer acts out of free will, who will be held accountable for them?

As an analogy, would a murderer's parents be punished for the misdeeds of their child?
 
.
A man made machine, no matter how smart, will not have a soul. So when it "dies" it will simply cease existing. This is the view you will get from a religious person, not that I necessarily believe it. I'm agnostic.

If you talk to an AI specialist from MIT, he will most likely tell you that self-awareness (or a soul) is just a by-product of the complexity of the system.

In such a scenario, is it ethical for humans to enslave self-aware machines? Korea has already drafted a bill of rights for the future self-aware robots:

BBC NEWS | Technology | Robotic age poses ethical dilemma
 
.
With artificial intelligence, computers won't just act based on the creator's wishes. It will be capable of independent decision making and eventually even self awareness.

In such circumstances, if a computer acts out of free will, who will be held accountable for them?

As an analogy, would a murderer's parents be punished for the misdeeds of their child?
Would depend...if you are to create a personality complete based off a person and 'force' the computer to do what it does, it is then not a self-aware or free being. In that case the A.I's actions are that of its personality and the person who forced the actions.

If the A.I is given free reign on what it wants to do without being forced by the person AND has a conscious - then it has a soul. If it is doing what it wants out of total free will, then it will be held accountable. In the end it is God that gives life and may judge it...I would deem A.I. as life so long as it has a conscious and self-awareness.

Parents are responsible in how they raise and condition their child...if they intentionally or out of poor ignorance allowed conditions for a cold murderer - then they too will be held accountable.
 
.
How do you find that? Scary? Blasphemous?
How does one reconcile such a thing with religious views? Will intelligent computers be judged by god? Will they go to heaven and hell?
Can man indeed surpass god's creation?
Although artificial intelligence would make it possible for computer to make decisions for itself, i doubt that it's really a big deal. In islam, the soul or the "ruh" is actually an object, it's not intellect or understanding. besides, don't look at it as life. the computer is programmed to make decisions on it's own, i think it's just an extension of what we already have now. i've been hearing about AI for a while now, it's not really a big deal. Only Allah can create and destroy life, therefore he judges it.
 
. . .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom