What's new

CNN: U.S. panel wants to ban China from buying American firms

Shotgunner51

RETIRED INTL MOD
Joined
Jan 6, 2015
Messages
7,165
Reaction score
48
Country
China
Location
China
U.S. panel wants to ban China from buying American firms
by Sherisse Pham @CNNMoneyInvest
November 17, 2016: 4:33 AM ET


The backlash against China's epic global shopping spree just intensified: a U.S. government panel is trying to stop Chinese state firms from snapping up American companies.

160212132837-trump-china-jobs-1024x576.jpg


Warning of a threat to national security, the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission wants the United States to block Chinese state-owned companies from carrying out takeovers in the country.

Chinese companies are buying up foreign businesses at a record rate this year, fueling unease and objections in some Western countries. Deals for technology companies have caused particular concerns.

The U.S. commission, which provides non-binding recommendations to Congress, is accusing Beijing of using its huge state-owned enterprises (SOEs) as tools to advance national security goals.

"There is an inherently high risk that whenever an SOE acquires or gains effective control of a U.S. company, it will use the technology, intelligence, and market power it gains in the service of the Chinese state to the detriment of U.S. national security," the commission said in a report released Wednesday.​

China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday.

Established by Congress to monitor U.S.-China relations, the commission is known for taking a hawkish stance toward Beijing.

Its report was published as U.S. President-elect Donald Trump, who has promised to get tough on China, is preparing to take charge in the White House. On the campaign trail, Trump threatened to slap tariffs of 45% on Chinese exports and label Beijing a "currency manipulator."

Chinese firms' rapidly growing investment in the U.S. is driven by a number of factors, including encouragement from the Chinese government, slowing growth at home and looser restrictions on overseas deals.

Western countries and companies often welcome the influx of Chinese money. But critics point out that China is much less open to foreign investment in many of its own industries.

Some recent attempts by Chinese state-backed companies to acquire U.S. technology businesses raised concerns in Washington.

Earlier this year, Fairchild Semiconductor rebuffed a higher offer from Chinese state-backed buyers, and instead agreed to a deal with an American rival, over an "unacceptable level of risk for a failure to obtain [regulatory] approval," according to a SEC filing.

State-owned company Tsinghua Unigroup also dropped a $3.8 billion investment in tech firm Western Digital (WDC) in February after U.S. regulators said they would investigate the deal on national security grounds.

U.S. lawmakers have also called on regulators to probe a Chinese takeover of the Chicago Stock Exchange.


http://money.cnn.com/2016/11/17/inv...na-state-owned-companies-takeovers/index.html
 
. . . .
Well this would all be moot if China didn't have a ban on foreign companies buying Chinese companies. Now the backlash happens.

Not just the US
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...rows-for-curbs-on-chinese-overseas-investment

From the same source that you quoted:

Chinese companies have announced or completed acquisitions of German companies worth a record 11.3 billion euros ($12.3 billion) this year, almost eight times the level of 2015, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
 
. . . . . .
There will be always alternative markets. As anticipated, China companies are directing their attention to acquisitions in Europe. In the end, if a US company is up for sale, it is for a reason. In case they cannot get another offer after rebuffing China's, then they will go under Chapter 11 and perhaps lay off workers.

China protects home market because it is still less mature than developed US market. When China achieves a level of market and technology maturity with that of the US, it will be probably warmer to foreign offers (except strategic sectors). Then, of course, buying up China companies will be much more difficult and expensive.

Mergers and acquisitions are not an act of charity; if a US company is up for sale, there must a be interests involved. It is not that they are helping China at the cost of their own interests. They try to maximize interests. If they are pushed to turn over cash from China, then it will come at the cost of some interests.
 
.
There will be always alternative markets. As anticipated, China companies are directing their attention to acquisitions in Europe. In the end, if a US company is up for sale, it is for a reason. In case they cannot get another offer after rebuffing China's, then they will go under Chapter 11 and perhaps lay off workers.

China protects home market because it is still less mature than developed US market. When China achieves a level of market and technology maturity with that of the US, it will be probably warmer to foreign offers (except strategic sectors). Then, of course, buying up China companies will be much more difficult and expensive.

Mergers and acquisitions are not an act of charity; if a US company is up for sale, there must a be interests involved. It is not that they are helping China at the cost of their own interests. They try to maximize interests. If they are pushed to turn over cash from China, then it will come at the cost of some interests.


Companies are not bought only when they are bankrupt.

Even well functioning companies can be targets of take over as demonstrated by take over of Syngenta, Kuka etc.

While Europe is still warm to Chinese investment, China must play its card well, or it might just as well lose that market as well.
 
.
Companies are not bought only when they are bankrupt.

Even well functioning companies can be targets of take over as demonstrated by take over of Syngenta, Kuka etc.

While Europe is still warm to Chinese investment, China must play its card well, or it might just as well lose that market as well.

They can be, but, it is eventually for the board and shareholders to decide.

They will decide ad act on based on their own interests (profit maximization), not on the interests of the buyer.

Takeovers or acquisitions are never acts of charity on both sides.
 
.
From the same source that you quoted:

Chinese companies have announced or completed acquisitions of German companies worth a record 11.3 billion euros ($12.3 billion) this year, almost eight times the level of 2015, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Yes, that is exactly why they are talking about bans. Plus they are not allowed to buy Chinese companies in return. If Chinese companies were not buying German companies there would be no talk of bans. Nobody is talking about banning Fiji from buying German companies since there is no issue.
 
Last edited:
. .

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom