What's new

CNN just got burned

Red-Bullet

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Britain, Canada and India are among the five main countries who have active Tamil Dispora members was stressed by the Sri Lankan Ambassador in Britain Chris Nonis.

He had stressed this while participating at a CNN news line conference ‘amanour’ programme.

It is learnt that the CNN journalist wanted to corner our Ambassador Chris Nonis, but he had been very brave and shrewd in answering to the questions posed and had become victorious over the CNN journalist. He had been able to have kept Sri Lanka at very high ebb.

At the time when the Commonwealth Heads of states were to participate in the CHOGM summit several LTTE supporters had discouraged the Heads of states in their participation. He had emphasised that Sri Lanka is an independent country that could be proved and for International investigations are not required he had boldly stressed.

During the panel discussion it was said that the Heads of states of Canada, India are not participating in the summit, for which he had replied that most of the Tamil Disapora members are lining in Britain, Canada and India among the five main countries. He also had emphasised that the richest members of the Tamil Disapora are living in these countries.

 
. . . .
The only thing i like abt CNN is Christian Amanpour's big bulging ***.....:rofl:
 
.
CNN got 'burned'?....LMAO

The interviewer asked relevant, to the point questions about war crimes, evidences and how journalists were not allowed to visit affected areas and the Sri-Lankan gave ridiculous alibi like...."these are all proxy-propaganda war"......."we don't need neutral investigation" etc......:lol:

You think you're smart but only the dumbest would deny war-crimes when there's overwhelming evidence against them.....and not allow neutral investigation....
 
Last edited:
. . . . . .
Yeah figures. It's why your politicians from Imran Khan to the ministers are all mourning the "Indian agent"......

You've lost 280 in Mumbai and you cry Pakistan Pakistan.. we have lost 49,000+ by now... that is 175 times more. How much criticism should you receive for sponsoring terrorists in Pakistan? India at the moment is not exposed to the level it deserves but that doesn't mean we have no anger or we wouldn't express it ever. India's time hasn't just came yet.
 
.
You've lost 280 in Mumbai and you cry Pakistan Pakistan.. we have lost 49,000+ by now... that is 175 times more. How much criticism should you receive for sponsoring terrorists in Pakistan? India at the moment is not exposed to the level it deserves but that doesn't mean we have no anger or we wouldn't express it ever. India's time hasn't just came yet.


What has that to do with the question about why IK & GoP are going crazy about a leader of a group you claim is Indian sponsored? 
Don't forget, Indian PM has already earned the title of 'dehati aurat' in diplomatic world.
Better worry about your PM rather getting personal at me.


Not worried about our PM, he seems to do fine. Can't say that about your PM though, he made a remark, denied, and then went around acting like that very "dehati aurat". That streak seems to run here too. The SL ambassador must name....:lol:
 
.
What has that to do with the question about why IK & GoP are going crazy about a leader of a group you claim is Indian sponsored?

It has to do with the sponsor behind that crazy leader. We don't celebrate TTP neither their terrorism is appreciated and where we know we have to deal with them, we know we have to deal with the sponsorers as well. When it comes to TTP, some of them are angered Pakistanis who are nevertheless our countrymen but when it comes to sponsor, they may not have any reason to be treated politely.
 
.
Not worried about our PM, he seems to do fine. Can't say that about your PM though, he made a remark, denied, and then went around acting like that very "dehati aurat". That streak seems to run here too. The SL ambassador must name....:lol:

That makes 2 'dehatti aurrat' than!

now focus at the interview.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom