Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
upgrade JF 17 to 4.5 generation and induct 5th generation aircradt from china.Paf must go for 4.5th generation combat aircraft as to compete with indian airforce,s growing capabilities.
Not saying NS is pushing anything but this much I'm sure that if we & im saying if su35 that road will come through Chinese as they have to take some guarantees for supply and other paraphernaliaI suggest PAF straightly go for J10c, cause it has internal mechanism to absorb radar wave.
@MarvellousThunder@PDC why you guys claim that Nawaz is pushing Su35 down to PAF's throat and it's his sugar milk?
I think the difference will be slightly not major that why PAF not inducted it and the biggest weakness of Chinese jets are they don't have decent ECM/ESM, J-10B is provide nothing new to PAF capabilities,I never asked deltas for maritime role. Thunders are well designed to take on mirages existing PAF roles easily and efficiently. What i was saying is that your quote " Having block 3 wont give us a need of J-10 of SIMILAR capabilities which is wrong. J10C is in a league of its own. It is very different from block 3. Has superior Radar , avionics to some extent , and yes engine off course and automatically payload. So comparing Block 3 to J10c in every aspect is wrong. J10c is a pure medium weight fighter , has 11 Hp - dual racks whereas Thunder can have 10-11 in the presence of dual racks
J-10B will add AESA to our fleet which non of F16 has. Imagine a j10 as f16 with aesa radar..but less payload than f16I think the difference will be slightly not major that why PAF not inducted it and the biggest weakness of Chinese jets are they don't have decent ECM/ESM, J-10B is provide nothing new to PAF capabilities,
J-10B haven't an AESA but a PESAJ-10B will add AESA to our fleet which non of F16 has. Imagine a j10 as f16 with aesa radar..but less payload than f16
It has AESA with 1275 T/R modulesJ-10B haven't an AESA but a PESA
But i read on most of sites and also on PDF that J-10B has a PESAIt has AESA with 1275 T/R modules
Its too much confusing for me sir@Deino Most of the articles claim that it has AESA . It is also specualted that block 1 j10b has pesa while block 2 j10b has AESA
Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee (CJCSC) General Zubair Mahmood Hayat on Wednesday called on Chief of the Air Staff, Air Chief Marshal Sohail Aman at the Air Headquarters, Islamabad.
On his arrival, General Zubair Mahmood Hayat was received by Air Chief Marshal Sohail Aman. He was given a detailed briefing on the organisation, role and functioning of the Pakistan Air Force (PAF).
Later on, the CJCSC called on the air chief in his office, wherein the two top military officials discussed matters of professional interest.
Air Chief Marshal Sohail Aman apprised the CJCSC about various ongoing modernisation/upgradation programmes of the PAF.
The CJCSC expressed his confidence in operational preparedness of the PAF.
The air chief, on the occasion, presented him a new book on the PAF titled “PAF Attaining New Heights.”
https://www.geo.tv/latest/142336-cjcsc-calls-on-air-chief-apprised-of-paf-modernisation-programmes
miss messiach , i need some guide from you please , it would be very kind of you. Like you mentioned in the Air cooling AESA from 607 institute thread that the cooling system is not that much efficient and that some heat from radar could be conducted to the airframe body which will have some serious effects. On the other hand , liquid cooling systems are very efficient but the cooling system needs some space which will be unsuitable for Block 1 and 2. So do you think that this specific radar being developed will also have same conduction issues?W/O fab-tech backbone we are at mercy of developer/manufacturer. Be it china. Bottom line. Our problems have intensified with rafales & israeli support to IAF and solutions are scanty.
miss messiach , i need some guide from you please , it would be very kind of you. Like you mentioned in the Air cooling AESA from 607 institute thread that the cooling system is not that much efficient and that some heat from radar could be conducted to the airframe body which will have some serious effects. On the other hand , liquid cooling systems are very efficient but the cooling system needs some space which will be unsuitable for Block 1 and 2. So do you think that this specific radar being developed will also have same conduction issues?