What's new

Choppy first ride home for INS Vikramaditya

Rangila

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
2,211
Reaction score
-2
Country
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic Of
Location
Argentina
Choppy first ride home for INS Vikramaditya - Hindustan Times

3a667430-bfbe-4535-8580-edb738f8aa6fwallpaper1.jpg


India’s largest and most-expensive warship, the INS Vikramaditya, faced embarrassing glitches during its home-bound voyage from the north Russian shipyard of Sevmash to the Karwar naval base in Karnataka, causing jitters in the defence ministry.



The $2.33 billion ( Rs. 13,980 crore) aircraft carrier, bought second-hand from Russia and delivered five years behind schedule, reportedly suffered a boiler breakdown during its 42-day journey, compromising the warship’s ability to cut through choppy seas at a top speed of up to 56 kmph, a navy source said. The vessel has a history of boiler problems with 2012 sea trials failing due to a design problem in the ship’s boilers.


Moreover, the tanker accompanying the 44,500-tonne aircraft carrier failed to carry out a refuelling mission near the Portuguese coast, raising doubts about the navy’s ability to replenish warships on the high seas.

A senior defence ministry official confirmed to HT that the warship faced technical problems during its homeward journey and the navy would be asked to submit a detailed report on the incidents.

“INS Deepak, the tanker, was unable to refuel the carrier off the Portuguese coast as the seas were very rough. The task was aborted till conditions were favourable,” the source added.

This is only the latest controversy to hit the troubled aircraft carrier, supposed to be a gift from Russia with India paying only for the refurbishments. The original $947 million ( Rs. 5,682 crore) deal, however, turned sour with multiple delays in delivery and a steep increase in price. The warship was finally delivered last year, five years behind schedule, with the Comptroller and Auditor General criticising the government for paying nearly 60% more than the cost of a brand-new aircraft carrier.
 
.
Choppy first ride home for INS Vikramaditya - Hindustan Times

3a667430-bfbe-4535-8580-edb738f8aa6fwallpaper1.jpg


India’s largest and most-expensive warship, the INS Vikramaditya, faced embarrassing glitches during its home-bound voyage from the north Russian shipyard of Sevmash to the Karwar naval base in Karnataka, causing jitters in the defence ministry.

The $2.33 billion ( Rs. 13,980 crore) aircraft carrier, bought second-hand from Russia and delivered five years behind schedule, reportedly suffered a boiler breakdown during its 42-day journey, compromising the warship’s ability to cut through choppy seas at a top speed of up to 56 kmph, a navy source said. The vessel has a history of boiler problems with 2012 sea trials failing due to a design problem in the ship’s boilers.

Moreover, the tanker accompanying the 44,500-tonne aircraft carrier failed to carry out a refuelling mission near the Portuguese coast, raising doubts about the navy’s ability to replenish warships on the high seas.

A senior defence ministry official confirmed to HT that the warship faced technical problems during its homeward journey and the navy would be asked to submit a detailed report on the incidents.

“INS Deepak, the tanker, was unable to refuel the carrier off the Portuguese coast as the seas were very rough. The task was aborted till conditions were favourable,” the source added.

This is only the latest controversy to hit the troubled aircraft carrier, supposed to be a gift from Russia with India paying only for the refurbishments. The original $947 million ( Rs. 5,682 crore) deal, however, turned sour with multiple delays in delivery and a steep increase in price. The warship was finally delivered last year, five years behind schedule, with the Comptroller and Auditor General criticising the government for paying nearly 60% more than the cost of a brand-new aircraft carrier.


Boiler breakdown ???

I just don't believe it . can't trust the Indian journalists to give correct technical information ....forget about drawing intelligent inferences ...

last time they confused INS Vikrant with INS Arihant ....!!!
 
. . .
Total and absolute BULLSHIT! Where is the authentic source for this news? Who is this so called 'senior defence ministry official who confirmed to HT that the warship faced technical problems during its homeward journey'?????

Why do newspapers publish news from 'anonymous sources'? To cover their asses obviously!

Nothing to see here guys.......
 
. .
Choppy first ride home for INS Vikramaditya - Hindustan Times



“INS Deepak, the tanker, was unable to refuel the carrier off the Portuguese coast as the seas were very rough. The task was aborted till conditions were favourable,” the source added.

So what exactly is the mega big crying and fuss around this?

It happens all the time, its a normal safety procedure... there was absolutely no reason why to hurry up with the refuelling process.
 
.
Gobble up some more on INS Vikramaditya. That is it.
 
.
So what exactly is the mega big crying and fuss around this?

It happens all the time, its a normal safety procedure... there was absolutely no reason why to hurry up with the refuelling process.


this is not a setback or anything .

has the reporter ever experience what ' choppy ' water actually means ?.
has he ever been to sea ?
or has he even seen the sea ?

If at all he had experienced the rolling and pitching of rough sea once in his life , he wouldn't have made this 'mountain' out of 'mole hill' ....
 
.
Waste of Time,thats what it is,visiting this thread..

Boiler breakdown ???

Boiler Breakdown,but the AC sailed thousands of Kms and came to India safely..what a BS.. :rofl: we should ask this "Writer" what about "repair of the boiler"???where they repaired it??:hitwall:
 
.
Antony asks Navy chief about glitches in Vikramaditya

Defence Minister A K Antony today asked the Navy to give a clear picture about reports that its largest warship INS Vikramaditya had suffered glitches during its voyage from Russia to India.

Navy Chief Admiral DK Joshi met Antony in his office and is learnt to have clarified on the issue, Defence Ministry officials said here.

The Navy Chief, it is learnt, told the minister that no major glitches were faced by the over Rs 12,000 crore warship during its journey to India.

vtpixpc.gif


According to reports, the long-delayed aircraft carrier had suffered a boiler breakdown during its 42-day journey, compromising the warship's ability to cut through choppy seas at a top speed of up to 56 kmph.

The vessel delivery to India was delayed by more than a year after problems occurred in its boilers during sea trials in Russia in 2011.

During the voyage of Vikramaditya to India from Russia, the Navy Headquarters was not happy with the activities of officers on board the ships escorting it to India as they had put up the aircraft carrier and the fleet warships on social media.

The Navy headquarters has also ordered an inquiry into the episode as this was the violation of guidelines and rules banning revelation of service-related details on such websites.

Antony asks Navy chief about glitches in Vikramaditya
 
.
How the hell do you get this:
Moreover, the tanker accompanying the 44,500-tonne aircraft carrier failed to carry out a refuelling mission near the Portuguese coast, raising doubts about the navy’s ability to replenish warships on the high seas.


From this:
“INS Deepak, the tanker, was unable to refuel the carrier off the Portuguese coast as the seas were very rough. The task was aborted till conditions were favourable,” the source added.


Bloody Indian journos! Sometimes I wonder if they are actually being paid to produce this anti-national cr@p. They have 0 knowledge about anything and especially defence matters. I mean for god's sake, ships can't be refuelled during rough sea states- this is a FACT, replenishment at sea means these two huge floating chunks of metal have to sail within metres of each other both sailing exactly parallel to one another, if they veer apart the lines between them that are already under extreme stress will snap and may possibly maim/kill personal on either ship, if they sail towards each other you're going to have a collision! You don't carry out such manoeuvres in rough sea states- no navy in the world who undertakes at-sea replenishment (of which there are very few) would.


I mean stupidity doesn't even cover it. This is downright slander.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom