Get Ya Wig Split
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2017
- Messages
- 2,585
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
Chinese Type 003 Fujian vs USS Gerald R. Ford || Who Would Win Aircraft Carrier Comparison
- Thread starter Get Ya Wig Split
- Start date
Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2017
- Messages
- 28,401
- Reaction score
- -82
- Country
- Location
Fujian was designed for Chinese requirements. Comparing with Ford is apples and oranges.
White and Green with M/S
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2020
- Messages
- 7,946
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Wrong comparison one is nuclear powered other is conventional powered
Yaoudelizard
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2022
- Messages
- 536
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
One is design to operate defensively closed to home and one is designed to operate offensively across the ocean. Completely different missions and requirements.
Leishangthem
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2019
- Messages
- 2,169
- Reaction score
- -7
- Country
- Location
Typical yank always talking above everyone on behalf of every one ,the horseshit is in their culture.
The resident youtube expert thinks himself to be so brilliant by judging Chinese scientist and experts as if only he has the ability to analyze,the poor chinese don't have brain cells to think like the armchair expert.
Not like the chinese thought their defense priority is the south china sea and a nuclear carrier would be a waste of resources .
Supplying carriers is such rocket science that the disciplined(sarcasm ) american can do it.
EMALS? just because the US emals sucks means the chinese suffers from the same ?
Did the armchair expert know that the Chinese made a breakthrough in emals and, training can be done on land for emals takeoff?
The reason there's 2 elevator is because,2 is the proper no ,while 3 takes extra space and resource when 2 is more than enough and there's waste ?
Now what are the points where Fujian leads?ignored?
Now you need to watch "CHINA'S PLANS TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD" - said in his sensationalist yank accent ,fkn scammer .
The resident youtube expert thinks himself to be so brilliant by judging Chinese scientist and experts as if only he has the ability to analyze,the poor chinese don't have brain cells to think like the armchair expert.
Not like the chinese thought their defense priority is the south china sea and a nuclear carrier would be a waste of resources .
Supplying carriers is such rocket science that the disciplined(sarcasm ) american can do it.
EMALS? just because the US emals sucks means the chinese suffers from the same ?
Did the armchair expert know that the Chinese made a breakthrough in emals and, training can be done on land for emals takeoff?
The reason there's 2 elevator is because,2 is the proper no ,while 3 takes extra space and resource when 2 is more than enough and there's waste ?
Now what are the points where Fujian leads?ignored?
Now you need to watch "CHINA'S PLANS TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD" - said in his sensationalist yank accent ,fkn scammer .
ChineseTiger1986
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2010
- Messages
- 23,530
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
Fujian is nuclear powered supported by gas turbines.
You cannot power a 100,000 tones supercarrier with conventional power only.
China is very discreet with the nuclear propulsion, and therefore, the official media has never acknowledged Fujian as a conventional carrier, nor they want to disclose it.
MajesticPug
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2021
- Messages
- 969
- Reaction score
- -12
- Country
- Location
Looks like American politicians and military leaders are getting more anxious just like the Indians 10 years ago. "We're still ahead" so said Biden. LOL
Similar threads
