What's new

Chinese Navy Task Force Conducting FREEDOM OF NAVIGATION OPERATION (FONOP) Inside United States EEZ Near Alaska Coast

Daniel808

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Nov 24, 2013
Messages
4,960
Reaction score
-8
Country
Indonesia
Location
Indonesia
PLA Warships Reportedly Sail Near Alaska, 'Display of Far-Sea Capabilities or Countermeasure Against US Provocation'
By Liu Xuanzun Published: Sep 14, 2021 12:26 AM

Photo taken on Jan. 12, 2020 shows the ceremony of the commissioning of the Nanchang, China's first Type 055 guided-missile destroyer, in the port city of Qingdao, east China's Shandong Province. The commission of Nanchang marks the Navy's leap from the third generation to the fourth generation of destroyers, according to a statement from the Navy. (Photo by Li Tang/Xinhua)

Photo taken on Jan. 12, 2020 shows the ceremony of the commissioning of the Nanchang, China's first Type 055 guided-missile destroyer, in the port city of Qingdao, east China's Shandong Province. The commission of Nanchang marks the Navy's leap from the third generation to the fourth generation of destroyers, according to a statement from the Navy. Photo: Xinhua

A website affiliated with the US Defense Department reported on Sunday that a naval flotilla of the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA), featuring one of China's most powerful warships, recently sailed in international waters near Alaska. However, the report was deleted for unknown reasons on Monday.

If the report is true, activities by Chinese warships are likely a normal far-sea training amid the PLA Navy's rapid development of such capabilities, Chinese analysts said on Monday, noting that this could also be seen as a countermeasure against US military provocations on China's doorsteps in the name of freedom of navigation.

A four-ship PLA Navy task force, including a guided missile cruiser, a guided missile destroyer, a general intelligence vessel and an auxiliary vessel sailed in international waters inside the US Exclusive Economic Zone, off the coast of the Aleutian Islands in Alaska, on August 29 and 30, the US Department of Defense reported on Sunday on the Defense Visual Information Distribution Service (DVIDS) website citing a release from the US Coast Guard District 17.

While the DVIDS report did not name the four PLA vessels, military observers said they are likely of the same flotilla that sailed east through the Soya Strait into the Pacific Ocean on August 24, as the timing and location would logically fit together.

The Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force on August 24 spotted a PLA Navy flotilla consisting of four warships, namely the Type 055 destroyer Nanchang, the Type 052D destroyer Guiyang, a Type 903A supply ship with hull number 903, and a surveillance ship with hull number 799, which passed through the Soya Strait from the Sea of Japan and then sailed east, Japan's Ministry of Defense Joint Staff said in a press release on August 25.

China and many countries classify the Type 055 as a destroyer but the US sees it as a cruiser.

During the activities of the PLA's warships near Alaska, US Coast Guard cutters Bertholf and Kimball were also operating in the area, the DVIDS report said, noting that the interactions between the US and Chinese vessels were safe and professional, and verbal communications were in accordance with international standards set forth in the Western Pacific Naval Symposium's Code for Unplanned Encounters at Sea and the Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea.

The DVIDS report became unavailable for unknown reasons on Monday.

China has yet to announce any related information as of Monday evening.

Assuming the US report is true, the PLA naval flotilla operated in the international waters, which means this could be a normal far-sea training and the Chinese ships did not show any sign of aggression or provocation, Wei Dongxu, a Beijing-based military expert, told the Global Times on Monday.

The flotilla, led by the 10,000 ton-class Type 055 destroyer, displayed the PLA Navy's rapid development in far-sea capabilities as Chinese warships are expected to train in more distant, unfamiliar waters in the future, Wei said, noting that the US sent coast guard ships because it is wary of the presence of Chinese warships close to the country, particularly advanced destroyers like the Type 055.

Warships from the US have been making frequent provocations near China in the name of freedom of navigation and now it might feel a little uncomfortable to see Chinese warships on its doorsteps, Wei said, stressing that "this is a countermeasure and a signal against the US actions of hegemony."

As for why the US deleted the report, a Chinese military expert who requested to remain anonymous told the Global Times on Monday that it is possible that there were factual errors. If report is true, the US could feel it lost face by having Chinese warships sailing near it, taking some of its own medicine of freedom of navigation.

This is not the first time the PLA Navy has sent warships to the region. In 2015, five PLA Navy ships transited expeditiously and continuously through the Aleutian Island chain in a manner consistent with international law, the US Naval Institute News reported at the time. It was an "innocent passage" within 12 nautical miles of the Aleutian Islands, the report said.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202109/1234184.shtml





Chinese Navy Freedom Task Force Fleet Freedom of Navigation (FON) Operation inside United States Exclusive Economic Zone near Alaska
E_J2IVMVQAgYGMg.jpeg
E_J2IeIUcAg7T5Z.jpeg
E_J2IqaVQAcMa9o.jpeg
E_J2I1rUcAAIceP.jpeg



 
. . . . .

Looks like their Coast guard are far more professional than their navy
Nothing special
Allowed by international sea laws
The only difference is the US don’t claim the seas of Alaska as based on an eunuch story.

Chinese basis to claim the South China Sea is a Natural island (Taiping Island) they have that Generate 200 mile EEZ for South China Sea
images (54).jpeg


Unlike Vietnam, who basis of their claim is this small stone in the middle of nowhere.
That cannot generate 200 mile EEZ under UNCLOS
images (55).jpeg
 
Last edited:
.
Surprise. USA immediately despatched its 2 antiquated coastguard vessels to escort China warships.

China has indicated it may soon becomes a norm for Bering sea and possibility of other parts of US coastlines as well.
 
.
Once near US, China warship will not survive if US decide to sink it. And vice versa.

But then Alaska is near Russia as well. Russian help can be called if US does anything stupid.
 
.
Nothing special
Allowed by international sea laws
The only difference is the US don’t claim the seas of Alaska as based on an eunuch story.
you are posting anything that happened in Vietnam as "Breaking news", even a viet woman married to a japanese man, but whatever happened in China, even mars rover mission, moon sample collection, nuclear fusion test is "nothing special".

Mr viet, Mr viet. :agree:
 
Last edited:
.
Nothing special
Allowed by international sea laws
The only difference is the US don’t claim the seas of Alaska as based on an eunuch story.

Nor do they judge territory by distance. Nor do they judge territory by distance. Just like the Spratly Islands is 1200 km away from China. It is too far to belong to China. Guam is 9,500 km from the United States, and it is definitely a U.S. territory.
 
.

Looks like their Coast guard are far more professional than their navy


Chinese basis to claim the South China Sea is a Natural island (Taiping Island) they have that Generate 200 mile EEZ for South China Sea
View attachment 777793

Unlike Vietnam, who basis of their claim is this small stone in the middle of nowhere.
That cannot generate 200 mile EEZ under UNCLOS
View attachment 777794
Old pic
Islands are getting bigger. We are seeking money to build more.
5BB4DC49-B541-4F42-BCE5-2A44AE2F7E9A.jpeg
1E53238A-43F7-477A-9B02-D76C6FDBF598.jpeg
FFFDD954-275E-46CC-9C4C-FA58BBEFB6B2.jpeg

0F4D76DD-4DF4-440E-9DF5-F58DC39FC9B2.jpeg

64F1807E-E365-4AE8-9006-CC1322906BEA.jpeg
 
.
Chinese are very kind people, they help 2 oldie US coast guard small cutter to protect their EEZ :enjoy:




You just reinforced my statement.

That Vietnam basis of claim is based on small stone which they build as artificial island that cannot generate 200 mile EEZ under UNCLOS.

Meanwhile, China basis of claim is based on Natural island (Taiping island) that can generate 200 mile EEZ across South China Sea under UNCLOS

Be smarter next time, mr viet :D
 
Last edited:
.
.
Chinese are very kind people, they help 2 oldie US coast guard small cutter to protect their EEZ :enjoy:





You just reinforced my statement.

That Vietnam basis of claim is based on small stone which they build as artificial island that cannot generate 200 mile EEZ under UNCLOS.

Meanwhile, China basis of claim is based on Natural island (Taiping island) that can generate 200 mile EEZ across South China Sea under UNCLOS

Be smarter next time, mr viet :D
Taiping is occupied illegally by Taiwan.
the chinese weaklings will be either kicked out by global warming or our help. No worry.
Claiming 200nm Eez? That’s new to me that the Taiwanese plan invasion of Vietnam.
Will be an interesting war.
 
.
LOL! China Media suddenly getting all hot and heavy and spooging but forgets something from 6 years ago...which the US Navy had to calmly and kindly remind them of making them look like ignorant idiots.



2015
 
Last edited:
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom