What's new

Chinese Industry On Edge After "Depressing" Censorship of Shanghai Festival's Opening Film

Bussard Ramjet

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Nov 10, 2014
Messages
3,978
Reaction score
2
Country
India
Location
India
Chinese Industry On Edge After "Depressing" Censorship of Shanghai Festival's Opening Film

The suspected reason behind the shocking cancellation of the $80 million Chinese epic 'The Eight Hundred' began to emerge on Saturday, just as the festival's opening ceremony was getting underway — without its opening movie.

The sudden cancellation of the Shanghai International Film Festival's opening film screening, Guan Hu's widely anticipated war epic The Eight Hundred, has sent a chill through the Chinese film business, with many local filmmakers and producers expressing dismay over what the decision might mean for the future of their industry.

News that The Eight Hundred was being pulled from the festival landed like a bombshell among the assembled Chinese film community in Shanghai on Friday, the eve of the big-budget movie's scheduled world premiere at the event's opening ceremony.

An official statement from the producers and the festival went out across social media saying that the screening had been suspended due to "technical reasons."

The citing of unexplained "technical" problems has begun to be interpreted in China as a euphemism for the censorship of content deemed politically inappropriate by the country's ruling Communist Party (CPC). The same rationale was deployed in February when celebrated Chinese filmmaker Zhang Yimou was forced to withdraw his much-anticipated latest work One Second from the Berlin International Film Festival.

The decision to pull The Eight Hundred, and the deliberately vague explanation that followed, was met with an outpouring of sadness, anger and derision from Chinese film professionals on social media. The mood at the Shanghai festival also was palpably downbeat on Saturday, as attendees discussed the news and implications on the sidelines of press conferences and industry gatherings.

"If China is catching up with developed countries, why is there always a problem with technology? You just can't tell the truth!" one Chinese film figure posted semi-privately on social media service WeChat.

Chinese auteur Jia Zhangke, arguably the country's most internationally recognized art house director, shot off his own simple but declarative post on Weibo, writing, "You can't do this to the film industry." The statement was widely retweeted, but China's internet regulators soon silenced the explosion of emotional commentary that emerged on his profile page by deactivating the comments section.

Cai Gongming, CEO of influential Beijing-based distributor Road Pictures, summed up the feelings of many in his professional community by posting an image of The Eight Hundred's official poster and writing, "I fell terrible."

Produced by Huayi Brothers Media, one of China's longest running and most respected private film studios, The Eight Hundred was expected to be one of the biggest films of the summer in the Middle Kingdom, boasting a budget of over $80 million — an enormous figure in China, where production spending tends to go twice as far than in high-cost Hollywood — and rave pre-release industry buzz.

Chinese president Xi Jingping's regime has tightened control over the content industries throughout 2019, in anticipation of the politically resonant 70th anniversary of the People’s Republic in October. The Eight Hundred's patriotic theme and story were thought to be well timed to the patriotic moment though.

Based on real-life history, the film centers on a pivotal Shanghai battle in 1937 during the Sino-Japanese war. In an episode that's now legend, some 400 Chinese fighters — an unlikely mix of soldiers, deserters and civilians — staged a heroic, ultimately doomed, defense of an isolated warehouse against waves of Japanese soldiers, so that China's principal forces could escape to the west to protect the country's heartland during the next phase of aggression. Shot mostly on Imax cameras — a first for the Chinese industry — the film was said to recreate such history in grippingly realistic action sequences, with some help from a team of distinguished Hollywood technical professionals, including Oscar-nominated visual effects supervisor Tim Crosbie (X-Men: Days of Future Past) and veteran action coordinator Glenn Boswell (The Matrix, The Hobbit).

By Saturday, as the Shanghai festival was beginning to get into full swing, The Eight Hundred's true "technical problems" were beginning to emerge. According to reports carried by several state-affiliated news outlets, the film first came under fire on July 9 during a meeting of the Chinese Red Culture Research Association, a Communist Party propaganda organization endorsed by the CPC's Publicity Department, the propaganda bureau that ominously took over oversight of the film industry from a more independent government body last year.

According to local reports, the meeting gathered several prominent film critics, as well as former Chinese military officials, for a discussion of "what kind of films [the country] should be producing in light of the 70th anniversary of the new China."

The Eight Hundred became a surprise focus of the forum because of the realities of the historical events it faithfully recreates. At the time of the Battle of Shanghai, the Chinese Nationalists (Kuomintang), led by Chiang Kai-shek, controlled the city and staged its heroic defense against the Japanese — not Mao Zedong's Communist Party. As such, Guan Hu's film accurately displays Chinese forces fighting under the Chinese Nationalist flag, now the flag of Taiwan. Although the Chinese lost the battle, historical consensus describes the warehouse episode as a vital morale booster to Chinese forces in the grinding war with Imperial Japan.

Among the participants of the July 9 propaganda meeting was Wang Lihua, a former general in the People's Liberation Army. "[This film] glorifies the fighting of the Nationalist Party, which seriously violates history," he reportedly said. "This deviates from historical materialism and should not be encouraged."

Guo Songmin, a former Chinese Air Force commander turned film critic, added: "They should not so enthusiastically promote the flag of the Nationalist Party in such a solemn and sacred way. If we do so, no matter what the intention, it will hurt the feelings of the soldiers who fought for establishing the new China, and it shows real disrespect for the People's Republic of China."

The forum reported concluded that The Eight Hundred was an inappropriate film for release during the 70th anniversary year of the PRC.

As is typical, Beijing's film regulators have provided no direct explanation for The Eight Hundred's glaring absence at the Shanghai festival (a huge poster for the film was still hanging over the event's main festival venue on Saturday); and the connection between the movie's retraction and the July 9 propaganda meeting remains a matter of conjecture. But much of the Chinese film industry took the emergence of the reports of the meeting as evidence enough— and the reaction on Saturday tended to be characterized by outrage and disgust.

"A gang of quitters who can't speak for themselves and cynically revise history is the real 'technical problem,'" said the CEO of a prominent Chinese movie theater chain in his private WeChat circle, composed mostly of entertainment industry people.

"Such a reason is humiliating to intelligence," posted another Chinese distributor. "The censors are now telling the truth [about why the film was censored]. That's good; at least it's some respect."

"It's all very depressing for many reasons," one influential Beijing-based producer told The Hollywood Reporter (requesting anonymity because of the risks of speaking out publicly).

"For one, I've seen the [The Eight Hundred], and it's really good," the producer said. "We should be taking pride in this kind of work, not repressing it."


https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/n...ge-opening-film-pulled-due-censorship-1218647
 
.
So basically what could have been a superb film about Chinese resistance against Japanese Aggression has been censored.

This is the reason why China will never be a cultural superpower like US.

And this is pure partisanship.

@Han Patriot @TaiShang @beijingwalker
 
. .
There must be tonnes of anti jap 'patriotic' movies out there. What makes it special? They got banned for a reason just like why India bans certain movies. ;)
 
.
There must be tonnes of anti jap 'patriotic' movies out there. What makes it special? They got banned for a reason just like why India bans certain movies. ;)

This one had the potential of being the Chinese Dunkirk. Facing incredible, insurmountable odds, Chinese people fought back!

India rarely if ever bans any movies.
 
.
This one had the potential of being the Chinese Dunkirk. Facing incredible, insurmountable odds, Chinese people fought back!

India rarely if ever bans any movies.
Well from Wikipedia it seems a lot were banned. You sure it was that good? A Chinese Dunkirk? Have you seen it? Chinese gov normally ban not just for political reasons, even nudity, etc gets banned.
 
.
So basically what could have been a superb film about Chinese resistance against Japanese Aggression has been censored.

This is the reason why China will never be a cultural superpower like US.

And this is pure partisanship.

@Han Patriot @TaiShang @beijingwalker
LOL.. Why would China wants to be a cultural superpower? China only wants to be finance, manufacturing, innovating and military superpower. US can keep that while relinquish the remaining to China.

Chinese Industry On Edge After "Depressing" Censorship of Shanghai Festival's Opening Film

The suspected reason behind the shocking cancellation of the $80 million Chinese epic 'The Eight Hundred' began to emerge on Saturday, just as the festival's opening ceremony was getting underway — without its opening movie.

The sudden cancellation of the Shanghai International Film Festival's opening film screening, Guan Hu's widely anticipated war epic The Eight Hundred, has sent a chill through the Chinese film business, with many local filmmakers and producers expressing dismay over what the decision might mean for the future of their industry.

News that The Eight Hundred was being pulled from the festival landed like a bombshell among the assembled Chinese film community in Shanghai on Friday, the eve of the big-budget movie's scheduled world premiere at the event's opening ceremony.

An official statement from the producers and the festival went out across social media saying that the screening had been suspended due to "technical reasons."

The citing of unexplained "technical" problems has begun to be interpreted in China as a euphemism for the censorship of content deemed politically inappropriate by the country's ruling Communist Party (CPC). The same rationale was deployed in February when celebrated Chinese filmmaker Zhang Yimou was forced to withdraw his much-anticipated latest work One Second from the Berlin International Film Festival.

The decision to pull The Eight Hundred, and the deliberately vague explanation that followed, was met with an outpouring of sadness, anger and derision from Chinese film professionals on social media. The mood at the Shanghai festival also was palpably downbeat on Saturday, as attendees discussed the news and implications on the sidelines of press conferences and industry gatherings.

"If China is catching up with developed countries, why is there always a problem with technology? You just can't tell the truth!" one Chinese film figure posted semi-privately on social media service WeChat.

Chinese auteur Jia Zhangke, arguably the country's most internationally recognized art house director, shot off his own simple but declarative post on Weibo, writing, "You can't do this to the film industry." The statement was widely retweeted, but China's internet regulators soon silenced the explosion of emotional commentary that emerged on his profile page by deactivating the comments section.

Cai Gongming, CEO of influential Beijing-based distributor Road Pictures, summed up the feelings of many in his professional community by posting an image of The Eight Hundred's official poster and writing, "I fell terrible."

Produced by Huayi Brothers Media, one of China's longest running and most respected private film studios, The Eight Hundred was expected to be one of the biggest films of the summer in the Middle Kingdom, boasting a budget of over $80 million — an enormous figure in China, where production spending tends to go twice as far than in high-cost Hollywood — and rave pre-release industry buzz.

Chinese president Xi Jingping's regime has tightened control over the content industries throughout 2019, in anticipation of the politically resonant 70th anniversary of the People’s Republic in October. The Eight Hundred's patriotic theme and story were thought to be well timed to the patriotic moment though.

Based on real-life history, the film centers on a pivotal Shanghai battle in 1937 during the Sino-Japanese war. In an episode that's now legend, some 400 Chinese fighters — an unlikely mix of soldiers, deserters and civilians — staged a heroic, ultimately doomed, defense of an isolated warehouse against waves of Japanese soldiers, so that China's principal forces could escape to the west to protect the country's heartland during the next phase of aggression. Shot mostly on Imax cameras — a first for the Chinese industry — the film was said to recreate such history in grippingly realistic action sequences, with some help from a team of distinguished Hollywood technical professionals, including Oscar-nominated visual effects supervisor Tim Crosbie (X-Men: Days of Future Past) and veteran action coordinator Glenn Boswell (The Matrix, The Hobbit).

By Saturday, as the Shanghai festival was beginning to get into full swing, The Eight Hundred's true "technical problems" were beginning to emerge. According to reports carried by several state-affiliated news outlets, the film first came under fire on July 9 during a meeting of the Chinese Red Culture Research Association, a Communist Party propaganda organization endorsed by the CPC's Publicity Department, the propaganda bureau that ominously took over oversight of the film industry from a more independent government body last year.

According to local reports, the meeting gathered several prominent film critics, as well as former Chinese military officials, for a discussion of "what kind of films [the country] should be producing in light of the 70th anniversary of the new China."

The Eight Hundred became a surprise focus of the forum because of the realities of the historical events it faithfully recreates. At the time of the Battle of Shanghai, the Chinese Nationalists (Kuomintang), led by Chiang Kai-shek, controlled the city and staged its heroic defense against the Japanese — not Mao Zedong's Communist Party. As such, Guan Hu's film accurately displays Chinese forces fighting under the Chinese Nationalist flag, now the flag of Taiwan. Although the Chinese lost the battle, historical consensus describes the warehouse episode as a vital morale booster to Chinese forces in the grinding war with Imperial Japan.

Among the participants of the July 9 propaganda meeting was Wang Lihua, a former general in the People's Liberation Army. "[This film] glorifies the fighting of the Nationalist Party, which seriously violates history," he reportedly said. "This deviates from historical materialism and should not be encouraged."

Guo Songmin, a former Chinese Air Force commander turned film critic, added: "They should not so enthusiastically promote the flag of the Nationalist Party in such a solemn and sacred way. If we do so, no matter what the intention, it will hurt the feelings of the soldiers who fought for establishing the new China, and it shows real disrespect for the People's Republic of China."

The forum reported concluded that The Eight Hundred was an inappropriate film for release during the 70th anniversary year of the PRC.

As is typical, Beijing's film regulators have provided no direct explanation for The Eight Hundred's glaring absence at the Shanghai festival (a huge poster for the film was still hanging over the event's main festival venue on Saturday); and the connection between the movie's retraction and the July 9 propaganda meeting remains a matter of conjecture. But much of the Chinese film industry took the emergence of the reports of the meeting as evidence enough— and the reaction on Saturday tended to be characterized by outrage and disgust.

"A gang of quitters who can't speak for themselves and cynically revise history is the real 'technical problem,'" said the CEO of a prominent Chinese movie theater chain in his private WeChat circle, composed mostly of entertainment industry people.

"Such a reason is humiliating to intelligence," posted another Chinese distributor. "The censors are now telling the truth [about why the film was censored]. That's good; at least it's some respect."

"It's all very depressing for many reasons," one influential Beijing-based producer told The Hollywood Reporter (requesting anonymity because of the risks of speaking out publicly).

"For one, I've seen the [The Eight Hundred], and it's really good," the producer said. "We should be taking pride in this kind of work, not repressing it."


https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/n...ge-opening-film-pulled-due-censorship-1218647
This films make the wrong scenario for war movie of China. I would want some Chinese to make a big budget epic film about PVA fighting in Korea War especially Shangganling battle(Golden Triangle). A movie show how well organised and highly motivated PVA troops tatically decimated the US and UN soldiers during the Yalu river battle which 38th army encircle US.

The Nationalist incompetency is the reason why Chinese are beaten quite badly during Sino-Japan war. If the Nationalist are replaced by Red Army during Sino-Jap war. I am sure Japan will suffer 3-4 times the original casualty in China campaign. PVA without advance weapon and air cover still manage to defeat the highly equipment UN troops and push the back to 38th parallel line.
 
Last edited:
.
I would prefer new big budget Red Cliff movie like. Chinese movies about old dynasties are the best.
 
.
Well from Wikipedia it seems a lot were banned. You sure it was that good? A Chinese Dunkirk? Have you seen it? Chinese gov normally ban not just for political reasons, even nudity, etc gets banned.

Most of the entries in the list of Wikipedia are actually movies that were banned but were ultimately shown after court directives. There are a very narrow range of reasons for which a movie can be banned in India.

In China however, getting movies approved is the issue.

LOL.. Why would China wants to be a cultural superpower? China only wants to be finance, manufacturing, innovating and military superpower. US can keep that while relinquish the remaining to China.

Cool then. There will be more protests in areas like Hong Kong. People even in immediate Chinese neighborhood like Korea, Vietnam etc. will take American side. America will have allies. Even within China, there will be simmering anger against the system.

Also, cultural and soft power are also required from the perspective of innovation, finance, manufacturing, and military.

Finance- China can be a big spot for global finance and its currency used for transactions only when investors and the global public believes in Chinese system. Cultural and Soft Power is one way to make them believe.

Innovation- Highly skilled Chinese student abroad will keep staying in the US or Europe. While on the other hand, people from other parts of the world like India will keep going to US. China will also not be able to convince the global public to use their products and services.
 
Last edited:
.
Most of the entries in the list of Wikipedia are actually movies that were banned but were ultimately shown after court directives. There are a very narrow range of reasons for which a movie can be banned in India.

In China however, getting movies approved is the issue.



Cool then. There will be more protests in areas like Hong Kong. People even in immediate Chinese neighborhood like Korea, Vietnam etc. will take American side. America will have allies. Even within China, there will be simmering anger against the system.

Also, cultural and soft power are also required from the perspective of innovation, finance, manufacturing, and military.

Finance- China can be a big spot for global finance and its currency used for transactions only when investors and the global public believes in Chinese system. Cultural and Soft Power is one way to make them believe.

Innovation- Highly skilled Chinese student abroad will keep staying in the US or Europe. While on the other hand, people from other parts of the world like India will keep going to US. China will also not be able to convince the global public to use their products and services.
The same had been said about China for the past 30 years. Yes we will implode and India will be a supapowa. Lol.

By ignoring the amount of creative entertainment coming our of China but only focusing on 1 or 2 banned films is very shortsighted.
 
.
Not really.

You can still make a good and entertaining movie without touching sensitive subjects.

But yeah, there are some writers who can't have a great idea if it's not a sensitive subject. Lol
 
. .
@Bussard Ramjet if you spend more time focusing on your own country then things will improve across India. Every time I see a piece of negative news on China it has your name on it. This obsession isn't healthy just some friendly advice.
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom