What's new

China's state media ran an article about nuclear strikes against Los Angeles

jerry_tan

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
260
Reaction score
0
Country
Afghanistan
Location
Afghanistan
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/time-...648.html?soc_src=mediacontentstory&soc_trk=fb

That time China's state media ran an article about nuclear strikes against Los Angeles

By Jeremy Bender 20 hours ago




View photo

.
That_time_Chinas_state_media-13f82f2588d3ae444ba24777a9a27528

(Screenshot/origin.www.uscc.gov)
A map published by a state-sponsored Chinese newspaper showing a nuclear strike against Los Angeles.

China has entertained the threat of nuclear strikes against west coast cities such as Los Angeles and Seattle, a 2014 annual congressional report from the US China Economic and Security Review Commission states.
According to the report, a Chinese newspaper sponsored by the Communist Party ran an article in November 2013 about the possibilities of nuclear intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) strikes against much of the US's Pacific coast. In the scenario imagined by the newspaper, China's new JIN ballistic missile submarine could act as an ultimate deterrent to any hostile US foreign policy.

[T]he 12 JL-2 nuclear missiles carried by one JIN nuclear submarine could cause the destruction of five million to 12 million people, forming a very clear deterrent effect. There is not a dense population in the United States' Midwest region, so to increase the destructive effect, the main soft targets for nuclear destruction in the United States will be the main cities on the west coast, such as Seattle, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and San Diego.

China has made similar veiled threats against US involvement in their backyard issues before. During the Taiwan Strait Crisis in 1995 to 1996, Chinese Lieutenant General Xiong Guangkai told the US assistant secretary of defense that "Americans care more about Los Angeles than they do about Taiwan."

However, threats from China today carry more weight than they did during the 1990s. According to an executive summary of the report, China's nuclear ICBM stockpile capable of reaching the US will likely expand to over 100 missiles within the next 15 years.

Simultaneously, China is putting finishing touches on a fleet of road-mobile ICBMs, the DF-41. The DF-41 will be capable of carrying up to 10 missiles that would each have a maximum range of 7,456 miles. This range would allow China to target the entirety of the continental US and it is expected to be ready within the year.

According to the executive summary, these capabilities are being produced to deter any unwanted US military action as Washington pivots its forces towards the Pacific. In practice, these new nuclear capabilities are providing "Beijing with a more extensive range of military and foreign policy options and potentially weakening U.S. extended deterrence, particularly with respect to Japan."

China's Navy is already expected to outpace the US's in sheer size by 2020. And Beijing's recently unveiled missile, the DF-26, has enough range to hit US assets in Guam from the US mainland.

These developments do not mean that China and the US are destined for conflict. However, China's ballistic capabilities point to the possibility of a Cold War-style nuclear standoff between Beijing and the US that would minimize the US's ability to militarily pressure China.
 
.
china will have 665 extinct cities for los angeles..
 
.
please nuke LA so we can nuke Shanghai. acutally please nuke all of Commiefornia.

it would be worth the trade.

clearly Chinese forget we have our own nuclear submarines each with 24 Trident II each of them carrying at minimum 5 warheads. I guess in their mind even if 100 million Chinese survive that it would be worth it. though they'll be living underground and eating cockroaches for decades.
 
Last edited:
.
It's somewhat amusing that these kinds of articles almost always fail to include what the other side's nuclear retaliation might look like.
 
.
It's an amusing sight to see members riled up by an article that is more or less a "paraphrase" of an opinion piece.
 
.
Morons thinking the US would not fire back typical CCP backward thinking
 
.
please nuke LA so we can nuke Shanghai. acutally please nuke all of Commiefornia.
hightaxfornia. :D

Then for every strike trump will add more tax against chinese goods to pay for american missiles.
 
.
hightaxfornia. :D

Then for every strike trump will add more tax against chinese goods to pay for american missiles.
no tax on Chinese goods with Trump . we just want fair trade is all. Chinese taxes our goods more than we tax theirs.

our tax dollars are well spent on our missiles, China can have a few for free.
 
.
china will have 665 extinct cities for los angeles..

LMAO, you got your math all wrong, in nuke war, we will deliver all to ensure the total annihilation or deliver none of the nuke , I'm pretty sure that if there is a nuke war with US, China will ensure to have the full insurance coverage of entire US, you and I will have to praise for the fate of humanity.

There is no such thing as nuke half way (few nukes) to make enemy undercook, we will rather toast the enemy if Nuke is really enter into war equation.
 
Last edited:
.
please nuke LA so we can nuke Shanghai. acutally please nuke all of Commiefornia.

it would be worth the trade.

clearly Chinese forget we have our own nuclear submarines each with 24 Trident II each of them carrying at minimum 5 warheads. I guess in their mind even if 100 million Chinese survive that it would be worth it. though they'll be living underground and eating cockroaches for decades.

Your war mongering state of America seriously needs to be contained, and what is even more worrisome is that you actually believe that you are the good guys and advocates of world peace, such heights of delusionalism.

How can a state that has been at war 222 out of 239 years of it's existence can be in any way good for humanity, Nazi Germany and the USSR paid their price for the crimes they committed but now the time has come for you to pay yours.
 
. .
China is a peace-loving country.

China's nuclear weapons are not directed against any specific country.

But China needs 10000 pieces of warheads just in case that a certain country starts to have any funny idea about China.
 
.
please nuke LA so we can nuke Shanghai. acutally please nuke all of Commiefornia.

it would be worth the trade.

clearly Chinese forget we have our own nuclear submarines each with 24 Trident II each of them carrying at minimum 5 warheads. I guess in their mind even if 100 million Chinese survive that it would be worth it. though they'll be living underground and eating cockroaches for decades.

I checked the nuclear detonation on the map, you will need approximately 2 Trident II missiles with W88 warheads to wipe out the entire Shanghai.

Given with 336 Trident II missiles, that's for approximately 200 Chinese cities.

But with China's developed MKV GMD like the DN-3, not all 336 Trident missiles will land on China's soil, more than half of the missiles will be intercepted as the D5 missile was developed during the 1980s, its maneuverability is relatively poor compared to the modern ICBM like the DF-41.

Also, one trillion dollars need to be spent to upgrade the US' aging nuclear arsenal.

http://www.globalzero.org/rsvp-no-1-trillion-nuclear-arsenal-washington-dc
 
Last edited:
.
How many years can be China Habitable after war with US?
because we (Chinese-Filipino) will go back in China and Plant Banana. :victory:

Any country from which a single piece of US military hardware originates in a war between the US and China is a legitimate target and will be annihilated as such by conventional or nuclear means..

So if you are willing to be cannon foldders....:D:D
 
.
China is a peace-loving country.

China's nuclear weapons are not directed against any specific country.

But China needs 10000 pieces of warheads just in case that a certain country starts to have any funny idea about China.

There is out of question to let enemy has nuke supremacy over China. I believe our generals are not happy just to have few nukes.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom