What's new

China's Manufacturers Are Shifting Towards Zero-Labor Factories

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
65,195
Reaction score
-55
Country
China
Location
China
China's Manufacturers Are Shifting Towards Zero-Labor Factories
George Dvorsky
5/04/15 12:40pm

A company in South China’s Guangdong province is building the city’s first zero-labor factory. It’s an effort to address worker shortages and rising labor costs, but the rise of semi-autonomous “smart factories” could be a sign of things to come, in China and elsewhere.

1237675728814237613.jpg

As China Daily is reporting, local authorities in Guangdong are introducing its “robot assembling line” strategy. To start, private company Everwin Precisions Technology Ltd is expecting to deploy 1,000 robots by the end of the first phase of the zero-labor project. According to its board chairman, Chen Qixing, the company will reduce its workforce by 90%. So instead of employing its current 2,000 workers, the company will require just 200 employees to operate software systems and administration. Owing to a severe labor shortage and mounting labor costs, similar projects may be unveiled elsewhere around the Pearl River Delta.

China’s shrinking workforce may be a natural consequence of demographic trends, but it’s also likely the result of economic globalization. As the middle class emerges in China, so too do salary expectations and the desire for jobs outside the manufacturing sector. What’s more, the demand cannot be met through the influx of migrant workers. To stave off catastrophic production short-falls, China’s economists are advocating for technology upgrades and the use of smart robots.

To that end, the local government in Guangdong will invest the equivalent of $152-billion to replace humans with robots within three years. Robotic fleets could appear in as many as 2,000 companies across the province, in addition to two advanced industrial bases for robot production.

With factories run almost entirely by robots, it will become increasingly difficult for manufacturers outside of China to compete. Owing to similar demographic and economic trends elsewhere, this may force companies outside of China to adopt similar strategies. At the same time, advances in automation are increasingly poised to remove humans from assembly-line work. It’s not going to make sense for companies to maintain a workforce when it can just use robots. The zero-labor factories in China are likely just the start of what’s going to be a global trend.

China's Manufacturers Are Shifting Towards Zero-Labor Factories
 
. . . .
lower cost and higher income in the long run, and those labour can join the service, culture and other industries where the working condition and pay is much better than from factories.

image.jpg
 
. .
That is why I am advocating lower birth and a more manageable population. China has 7 million new graduate hit the market last years and many end up as nanny or odd job labourers.

This year the number of graduate can be worst.
 
.
That is why I am advocating lower birth and a more manageable population. China has 7 million new graduate hit the market last years and many end up as nanny or odd job labourers.

This year the number of graduate can be worst.

CPC's future plan is to control China's population between 600-800 million when the high automation robot force is ready to handle the manufacturing jobs.
 
.
even if there were thousands of factories over there, there wouldnt be any job vacancy for a lazy bummer

judging the book by its cover are we.

Joking aside


Would China and India be economic powers today if it weren't for manufacturing.
 
.
Japan has been relying on this hope of automation now for close to 3 decades. It never happened! That is why Japan, a reclusive ultra-homogenous society finally is willing to accept immigrants.

It will never happen!

Why?
Because humans are still the fundamental unit of both production and consumption. Technology can increase productivity, but it is way off to be even close to replacing humans altogether. Of course, technology can displace some people from low paying jobs, to higher productive ones. But remember this is a common denominator across all countries. Technology with the right policies can be adopted by anyone.

Just consider China and United States. China has 4 times the population, but around 1/7th the productivity. With more technology, the productivity will rise. But it will rise for BOTH nations. And China doesn't even have a replacement fertility ratio. The population will begin to decline within 7 years, if nothing serious is done. US population is increasing due to immigration etc.

That is why I am advocating lower birth and a more manageable population. China has 7 million new graduate hit the market last years and many end up as nanny or odd job labourers.

This year the number of graduate can be worst.

The solution is not less graduates, but better skills.

Also, for the right jobs, employers are essentially begging for employees. Just look at the high tech sector. There was a line of recruiters for Yahoo employees once it shut down.

Better skills.

Also, you need to have a large pool of graduates to create competition and cheaper high quality talent.

CPC's future plan is to control China's population between 600-800 million when the high automation robot force is ready to handle the manufacturing jobs.

Do you know much about automation?
No robot force is replacing low skilled jobs for many decades.
There are very few industries which have actually been able to automate to a certain extent. And even, then you need skilled employees for everything.

Japan has been relying on the hope of robots now for over 2 decades. Don't become another Japan. And your demographic crisis is actually larger than that of Japan.
 
. .
CPC's future plan is to control China's population between 600-800 million when the high automation robot force is ready to handle the manufacturing jobs.

I as an investor outsourced my manufacturing to China cause of cheap labour, but I still have to bear the cost of transport and duties. Why would I leave the plant in China and not just install it in the Country I am from, if robots can do it cheaper, manufacturing it local cutting the cost of transportation and Chinese taxation and not to mention local Excise and other hidden taxation saving millions per year cutting cost even more.

How the Chinese going to compete with me, say if I were to install that manufacturing plant in USA or Canada. My cost will be lower in North America to sell then the Chinese manufacturer.
 
.
Japan is a very small country and its manufacturing sector has never been as strong as China's. China now is the world's No.1 manufacturing powerhouse, which enables China to rewrite the rules for the world's manufacturing industry.
 
.
I as an investor outsourced my manufacturing to China cause of cheap labour, but I still have to bear the cost of transport and duties. Why would I leave the plant in China and not just install it in the Nation I am from if robots can do it cheaper, cutting the cost of transportation and Chinese taxation and not to mention local Excise and other hidden taxation saving millions per year cutting cost even more.

How the Chinese going to compete with me, say if I were to install that manufacturing plant in USA or Canada. My cost will be lower in North America to sell then the Chinese manufacturer.

Because China isn't relying on the cheap labor anymore.

Walmart can move out anytime if they want, but they still choose to stay because China's infrastructure and transportation is unmatched by other nations, so to produce in China still proves to be the most cost efficient.

China's technological power is booming, so we can afford to reduce our population in the future.
 
.
Automation has been the plan from the beginning. The writing was on the wall in the 1960's. The question is what country will all those robots work in. Taking the man out of the picture doesn't solve the pollution problem.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom