China’s Economy Is Looking Better and Better

[Solomon2]

...Corporate tax cuts, an upswing in manufacturing and expected progress on a U.S. trade deal are among the factors buoying optimism...

“Policy makers have responded to the U.S.-China trade war with a ’do-whatever-it-takes’ approach to supporting growth, taking on a wide array of easing measures. Financial conditions have started to improve and the large increase in the March manufacturing PMI might be the first indication that economic activity is bottoming out,”...

tax reductions announced last month are equivalent to over 2 percent of projected 2019 gross domestic product, making them the biggest in a decade. Those cuts and other measures will trigger a self-sustained recovery -

So ultimately the Chinese can credit President Trump with compelling their leaders to lower their taxes and stimulate greater economic activity.

 

[ZeEa5KPul]

So ultimately the Chinese can credit President Trump with compelling their leaders to lower their taxes and stimulate greater economic activity.

I gave you a thumbs up because that was the most hilarious thing I read this week.
Trump: We cannot continue to allow China to rape our country, and that's what they're doing.
China: *GDP still growing like a weed, trade deficit with the US expands, trade war shrugged off*
Trump: See, I'm winning. My policies made their economy expand!
America:
Me:

 

[Sanchez]

The more pressure China gets the stronger the country develops.

 

[Solomon2]

I gave you a thumbs up because that was the most hilarious thing I read this week.
Trump: We cannot continue to allow China to rape our country, and that's what they're doing.
China: *GDP still growing like a weed, trade deficit with the US expands, trade war shrugged off*
Trump: See, I'm winning. My policies made their economy expand!
America:
Me:

And the more China's economy expands, the greater its demand for U.S. exports. Yes, Trump is winning.

 

[Sanchez]

And the more China's economy expands, the greater its demand for U.S. exports. Yes, Trump is winning.

China imports most chips from the US. Hopefully US should ban your export of those stuff so that Chinese can make ourselves after a year or two. US is no longer the No. 1 trading partner of China.

 

[Jlaw]

China is opening up its financial sector to foreigners. Expect more Chinese layoffs, food rationing by 2023 when foreigners (mainly elite Jews) start to hold a majority control of China's economy. @Viva_Viet

 

[TaiShang]

The Western media is too pluralistic to have any single unanimous view.
For every China basher there's also a China cheerleader, or a West basher. I'm sure I've seen more headlines on how the US or the USD is collapsing than on how China is imploding.

Western media is not pluralistic. It seems pluralistic. Usually, however, behind all those pluralism, there is concentrated power and wealth which controls all the pluralism.

That's why the US media and academia seem to be perfectly matched with the policies and demands of the US regime. For instance, just when it needed, the US regime academia spit off the concept of "sharp power" to characterize China.

In that, nobody can beat the US media and academia.

As for opinion toward China, save few rational voices, China experts in the West are classified into two main groups: China threat and China collapse theorists.

You should not mistake China threat theorists thinking that BYD rail cars are able to spy on innocent Washington DC bureaucrats for supporting China.

In the end, both groups are doing the same service to their regime. Just that, their ways and means are slightly different.

 

[cirr]

Gordon Chang you guys pls don't blow his cover

 

[beijingwalker]

Western media is not pluralistic. It seems pluralistic. Usually, however, behind all those pluralism, there is concentrated power and wealth which controls all the pluralism.

That's why the US media and academia seem to be perfectly matched with the policies and demands of the US regime. For instance, just when it needed, the US regime academia spit off the concept of "sharp power" to characterize China.

In that, nobody can beat the US media and academia.

As for opinion toward China, save few rational voices, China experts in the West are classified into two main groups: China threat and China collapse theorists.

You should not mistake China threat theorists thinking that BYD rail cars are able to spy on innocent Washington DC bureaucrats for supporting China.

In the end, both groups are doing the same service to their regime. Just that, their ways and means are slightly different.

Well said, the western media can always form a mainstream general consensue inline with their governments agenda and create a media environment to serve this purpose with sporadic small opposing voice as their facade of pluralism.