What's new

China’s Economic Base Is Shrinking, And Dramatically So

Get Ya Wig Split

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Feb 22, 2017
Messages
2,585
Reaction score
-2
Country
United States
Location
United States

China’s Economic Base Is Shrinking, And Dramatically So

960x0.jpg

Beijing has informed the world that for the first time in 70 years the nation’s population declined – by some 850,000 since the last census. It seems set to stay on this trajectory, too. United Nations (UN) demographers see future declines, from a population of 1.4 billion presently to 1.3 billion in 2050, to 800 million or so by the end of the century. This demographic reality promises to constrain the nation’s growth prospects severely, not immediately but with growing intensity over coming years. It further promises to compound economic ill effects by raising debt levels in this already debt-heavy economy. And there is little Beijing can do to mitigate these unwelcome implications.

The crucial demographic consideration, for economics at least, is the relative size of the nation’s working-age population. Because Beijing for decades imposed a one-child policy on Chinese families – for the last 45 years in fact until recently – the nation now faces a relative paucity of workers to replace the huge generation that is now retiring. The numbers of those of working age – by convention, between the ages of 15 and 64 – have in fact hardly grown at all since 2010. But the older population of retirement-age Chinese has grown a whopping 53 percent, increasing from 9 percent of the total population in 2010 to 13 percent at last measure. There are as a consequence, barely 3.5 people of working age today available to support each retiree, down from about 6.5 in 2000 and 5.5 in 2010. And that figure is expected to fall below 2.3 by 2030 and even lower in the years following.

To grasp the economic ramifications of this situation, consider the burden on these few workers. Each must support himself or herself, personal dependents, and about a third of everything each retiree needs. No three-some workers anywhere, at least on average, are productive enough to shoulder this need. The economic strain will be that much greater than the raw numbers imply because the large aging population will necessarily siphon off workers from everyday production to medical and other care needs. China will have little surplus production for the investments required for economic growth, most especially the grand projects for which China has become famous and which have so contributed to the country’s former, impressive pace of growth.

What is more damaging is that these demographics will have significant and adverse financial implications as well. The pension needs of these retirees will force considerable borrowing requirements on local governments as well as Beijing. China already carries a bigger debt burden than most countries, including even the United States. At last measure all debt – public and private – amounted to the equivalent of about $52 trillion, verging on almost three times the size of the economy. To be sure, Washington carries a bigger debt burden than Beijing does, but that is because Beijing off loads borrowing needs — to support infrastructure spending for instance — onto local governments. Pension demands will increase this burden still further and unavoidably crowd out the growth-fostering projects that in the past have done so much for China’s development.
And there is little Beijing can do to offset these ill effects. A few years ago, the authorities finally awakened to the potential economic damage of the one-child policy. They rescinded the law and allowed larger families. But even if Chinese people had immediately taken advantage of that more liberal environment, it would be 15-20 years before the change could have effect on the relative size of the country’s working-age population. As it is, the nation’s fertility rate has not risen in response to the new law. Nor is China likely to see a wave of immigration to enlarge the ranks of the working aged. On the contrary, China regularly experiences more out than in migration.

The only other avenue open for relief is in worker productivity. To this end, Beijing has emphasized the development and adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics. Indeed, China has become a world leader in these areas. No doubt in time these trends will substitute algorithms, computers, and machines for labor and make the country’s relatively limited working population more productive than it is today. AI and robotics can also help by limiting the need for physical labor and thereby enabling Chinese to work at older ages than in the past. But these things can only go so far. However much these efforts can mitigate the strain imposed by demographic realities, they cannot correct for them entirely, leaving China facing slower growth with less room for grand investment projects than has been the case until now.

 
. .
Shortage of people with a billion around? He is smoking something. China will be a beautiful country even at 500 million population.
Shortage of working age people, yeah. Countries need a young population and constant population growth for their economy to grow.
 
.
No, but if the West needs to believe this stupidity so it doesn't go full crazy during this sensitive time while China is building up its military, be my guest. I'd much rather dumb Westoids believe everyone in China will die of old age in 10 years than finally understand that attacking China is a now or never proposition.
 
. .
Shortage of working age people, yeah. Countries need a young population and constant population growth for their economy to grow.
Yup true.
But this is true for all developing world including Japan Korea and Europe

Infact the problem is several times worse in those countries

Without immigration even the USA population will be shrinking
 
.
Yup true.
But this is true for all developing world including Japan Korea and Europe

Infact the problem is several times worse in those countries

Without immigration even the USA population will be shrinking
Yes. However those countries reached a very highly developed status before that happened.
 
. .
How are Pakistan and Nigeria faring on your scale? And Japan and Korea on the other end?
Japan's economy isn't in a good shape at all, Japan is chronically in deflation which is much worse than having inflation (even though recently they have finally got to a point they have inflation). Korea is in a better place but its population is on average 6 years younger, so that explains it.

Population growth is pretty much essential for economic growth, however it is not the only factor, that's why countries like Pakistan and Nigeria aren't that successful.

So? All that means is that China still has enormous room to grow.
It means China is in a race to get fully developed, before its population shrinks to the point economic growth is much harder to achieve, like Japan is at right now.
 
.
It means China is in a race to get fully developed, before its population shrinks to the point economic growth is much harder to achieve, like Japan is at right now.
That's not how it works. Even if there's any truth to the "China will get old before it gets rich" meme, all that means is a lot of old Chinese people will die poor. Sad but true. They'll die much richer than they were in their youth when China was literally dirt poor, but still.

What doomsayers miss is that a large part of China's workforce (25%) is still in agriculture. There'll be a constant stream of internal migrants to China's cities over the next 20 years as these people urbanize and take higher-value jobs.
 
.
That's not how it works. Even if there's any truth to the "China will get old before it gets rich" meme, all that means is a lot of old Chinese people will die poor. Sad but true. They'll die much richer than they were in their youth when China was literally dirt poor, but still.

What doomsayers miss is that a large part of China's workforce (25%) is still in agriculture. There'll be a constant stream of internal migrants to China's cities over the next 20 years as these people urbanize and take higher-value jobs.
With China's current hostile approach towards countries like Taiwan, the west could easily block all food imports to China in response to a war, which already largely depends on food imports. I don't think it's a smart idea to make China's food supply less independent. At least not with the current approach.
 
.
Shortage of working age people, yeah. Countries need a young population and constant population growth for their economy to grow.

There are 900 million people in working age with 10 million entering the job market each year.
 
.
With China's current hostile approach towards countries like Taiwan, the west could easily block all food imports to China in response to a war, which already largely depends on food imports. I don't think it's a smart idea to make China's food supply less independent. At least not with the current approach.
Taiwan is not a country, but Chinese territory.
 
.
Japan's economy isn't in a good shape at all, Japan is chronically in deflation which is much worse than having inflation (even though recently they have finally got to a point they have inflation). Korea is in a better place but its population is on average 6 years younger, so that explains it.

Population growth is pretty much essential for economic growth, however it is not the only factor, that's why countries like Pakistan and Nigeria aren't that successful.


It means China is in a race to get fully developed, before its population shrinks to the point economic growth is much harder to achieve, like Japan is at right now.
Can China restart population growth..my meeting with rural Chinese my guess is may be in rural China ...
If it does China has very bright future

If it doesn't well China would need to adopt and keep the option of immigration open if it needs to
 
.
I can sense the desperateness and gloom in the posts of our Western friends on this forum nowadays, trying to find any pettiest problems in China and post here as if China would collapse tomorrow, while ignoring big problems at home.

Really enjoying that. Not unlike the mentality of our Indian friends here, especially in early 2010s.
 
Last edited:
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom