What's new

China will build up to 42 Units Type 055 large destroyer

.
What is wrong if China build 42 units type 055!?
After all CHINA build 36 units type 054A(PAKISTAN navy 4 units included)
??

The question is why not! Considering PLA 6 aircraft battle group,42 units is less !
CHINA has the money and techs and has the SCS disputes as well as the obligation to maintain Asia and indian ocean peace and prosperity!
again,why not!?
Thats a Killer guyssss !!! 42? Seriously????? Why :cray:
 
.
The calculation is based on a false assumption.USN doesn't have any significant frigates so its only real ships are burke or tico .China has dozens of capable frigates and are a much more closer to shore kind of navy.The existence of large no.of type 54s makes no sense if they need to build 42 055 cruisers.Chinese CBGs will have type 52Ds as well as type 54s.Moreover huge capital ships are vulnerable against submarines and not suitable for solo ASW duty for which Type54 supported by type 56 will be better suited.So a CBG with only 4-5 type 55 cruiser escort is inefficient and weak in ASW.It will be a mix of 1-2 052d,1-2 054a/b,2 055 and nuke sub escorts.
 
. .
I'm more excited about all energy ships with laser and electromagnetic weapons that General Ma talked about last year. Those are going to be the real game changer.
 
.
You don't need 42 of these. 18 of it these enough to send any navy shivering.
:lol:
Yeah im sure the US Navy is shivering with 18 Chinese type 055:crazy:

The calculation is based on a false assumption.USN doesn't have any significant frigates so its only real ships are burke or tico .China has dozens of capable frigates and are a much more closer to shore kind of navy.The existence of large no.of type 54s makes no sense if they need to build 42 055 cruisers.Chinese CBGs will have type 52Ds as well as type 54s.Moreover huge capital ships are vulnerable against submarines and not suitable for solo ASW duty for which Type54 supported by type 56 will be better suited.So a CBG with only 4-5 type 55 cruiser escort is inefficient and weak in ASW.It will be a mix of 1-2 052d,1-2 054a/b,2 055 and nuke sub escorts.
I smell a scared Indian . And China have not reached 20 055 yet.

:lol:
 
.
055 has not finished testing yet. not smart to start mass production yet. China should focus on 055B
 
.
055 has not finished testing yet. not smart to start mass production yet. China should focus on 055B
every major navy project was well tested and examed before going for bulk order, 055's initial order was 6 units, I dont know where did you get the idea of "not finished testing" from````most of the subsystems of 055 were well "tested" on 052C, 052D and 054A
 
.
every major navy project was well tested and examed before going for bulk order, 055's initial order was 6 units, I dont know where did you get the idea of "not finished testing" from````most of the subsystems of 055 were well "tested" on 052C, 052D and 054A
Last time I checked the first 055 is not commissioned and still undergoing sea trials.
 
.
Last time I checked the first 055 is not commissioned and still undergoing sea trials.
sea trial is sea trial, its different, there is no such thing called “testing 055 and going for 055B”````besides, 055A will come before 055B FYI``

and again, the initial order for 055 is 6 (maybe 8), and for such project, the PLAN wont put down the money if it has not finised the tests````
 
.
055 has not finished testing yet. not smart to start mass production yet. China should focus on 055B

haha mass production ... man china has literally focked up the calculus no other nation has the capability to mass produce a 12k ton heavy destroyers like type 55.
Vehicles can be mass produced but destroyers amazing
 
. . .
sea trial is sea trial, its different, there is no such thing called “testing 055 and going for 055B”````besides, 055A will come before 055B FYI``

and again, the initial order for 055 is 6 (maybe 8), and for such project, the PLAN wont put down the money if it has not finised the tests````
PLAN is very professional force.
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom