What's new

China responds angrily to Australia-US joint statement a day after AUKUS submarine deal was announced

aziqbal

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 26, 2010
Messages
7,403
Reaction score
-10
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
China responds angrily to Australia-US joint statement a day after AUKUS submarine deal was announced
Posted 10h ago10 hours ago
Australian Foreign Minister Marise Payne and US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken speak from lecterns at a bilateral meet

Foreign Minister Marise Payne at a news conference with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken during Australia-US ministerial consultations.(
Reuters: Andrew Harnik/Pool
)
 
. . .
And about the time when China launch her first space warship the first SSN for Australia will delivered after all the technique delays and cost overruns.
 
. .
it was meant as a joke.
It's unfortunate though. If Pakistan's economy was better, it could easily afford to operate half a dozen nuclear subs. Their speed, endurance and lethality cannot be matched by conventional subs.
 
.
It's unfortunate though. If Pakistan's economy was better, it could easily afford to operate half a dozen nuclear subs. Their speed, endurance and lethality cannot be matched by conventional subs.
We are already getting advanced AIP diesel subs from China which are enough for our needs.
 
.
USA is not going to be deterred by any of Beijing angry statements. USA U.K. are coming and building against China. the only good reliable partner it has is Pakistan. I don’t know what China is waiting for they should finance a potent Pakistan naval to guard its interests by knocking its rival india out
 
.
We are already getting advanced AIP diesel subs from China which are enough for our needs.

diesel subs are meh.

nuclear subs can stay submerged for months, basically until food supplies and oxygen run out, the nuclear sub can run for up to 30 years without refueling, which means that it has a longer range to travel. diesel subs cannot venture far from port as it would need to refuel, a nuclear sub does not have the problem.
a 2nd strike threat is only really credible if delivered from a nuclear submarine.
 
. .
Australia should it choose, should be armed to the teeth.
 
. .
USA is not going to be deterred by any of Beijing angry statements. USA U.K. are coming and building against China. the only good reliable partner it has is Pakistan. I don’t know what China is waiting for they should finance a potent Pakistan naval to guard its interests by knocking its rival india out

I believe that China's assistance to Palistan will remain, by and large, limited and constrained, primarily, for the reason that China doesn't feel any real threat from India. China's real target is US, along with it's core allies.
 
.
China responds angrily to Australia-US joint statement a day after AUKUS submarine deal was announced
Posted 10h ago10 hours ago
Australian Foreign Minister Marise Payne and US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken speak from lecterns at a bilateral meet

Foreign Minister Marise Payne at a news conference with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken during Australia-US ministerial consultations.(
Reuters: Andrew Harnik/Pool
)
France has called back it's envoy from US and Aus. Seems like whole world is angry lol 🤣
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom