What's new

China openly admits to forced "re-education" of Uyghur women

Following are the options for Cheerleaders:
1) The tweeter handle is hacked.
2) Freedom to women is intrinsic part of our culture & religion. China is just doing what we have always done.
3) Where does it say that China is doing this to women of a specific religion?
4) China is our friend. We may have differences but we will not let enemies take advantage
5) Its all US conspiracy to stop China from being a Superpower. US will fail. China will rise. No one can stop China.

Take your pick. Even god cannot shake the friendship which is deeper-than-oceans & higher-than-mountains .
oh so. "Gender equality" 性别平等 means birth control?
 
.
China: Educates, empowers and protects women from abuse AND prevents terrorism trough positive thinking and positive actions rather than violance and hate at the same time and is proud of it.
Rape and slave capital of the world cheerleaders: See the country we hate openly admits sterilizing ethnic minority women. Really sheding crocodile tears about minorities we'd rape and beat up here.

🙄

Cant even make "China could cure AIDS ..." jokes anymore after all these "China Covid vaccine politics" headlines spammed by the samer haters.
 
Last edited:
.
India and China have the mighty river plains that have historically been the cradle of populous civilizations and empires. They are the "two kings". These are the natural population levels that can be supported by the land. Nothing alarming.

I did not understand the King Effect at this point but will still reply.

Should the huge historic populations of India and China have been allowed to continue in post World War 2 / post Colonial modern time ?

Russia is the world's largest country in size yet has a population of slightly more than 140 million.

And yes, public transport would be good everywhere, not just India. This has nothing to do with population though.

Well, I was just making a point about unsustainability in India and China if its middle class and upper class are allowed to continue their highly consumerist lifestyle.

But yes, your underlined point is correct. Such a thing should be imposed all over the world. I believe when Uber started its service in America its advertisement was that many Americans will no longer need to bring out their vehicles to go somewhere because they can depend on Uber.


Two things struck me from the article :

1. The governments seem to be focusing more though occasionally on sterilization in rural areas when there are also so many economically deprived people in urban areas, living in slums and in pipes, and having more children than they can get them to prosper. But this is also a case of government mis-spending ( on the military, on unnecessary construction projects etc ) and of socio-economic disparity ( Mukesh Ambani's 27-storey "house" ).

2. Many middle class families are still conservative and produce three children as well and push them into middle class poverty, where they will be able to buy consumer items and flats on loan but for years be wage slaves to repay the loans. They will birth children who will repeat the cycle. And they will be culturally conservative as well. Hindus and Muslims alike.
So all in all, burdensome on the planet's ecosystem and societally disharmonious.

---

OK, I am logging-off but you can leave your reply. I will reply tomorrow.
 
.
Even god cannot shake the friendship which is deeper-than-oceans & higher-than-mountains .
Don't forget "sweeter than honey".
China: Educates, empowers and protects women from abuse AND prevents terrorism trough positive thinking and positive actions rather than violance and hate at the same time and is proud of it.
Rape capital of the world: See the country we hate openly admits sterilizing ethnic minority women. Really sheding crocodile tears about minorities we'd rape and beat up here.

🙄
Here's an excerpt from the link: "In 2017, Xinjiang revised its Regulations on Population and Family Planning, stipulating that all ethnic groups should implement a unified family planning policy allowing couples in urban areas to have two children, and those in rural areas three."
Which part of mandating the maximum number of children one is supposed to have empowers women? Which part of the much famed "re-education" is supposed to empower women? My intention of posting this was to gauge the reaction of Pakistanis. Of course the nationalists see national interest first and they don't care about this. What about the ones who still care about the principles of Islam to not have contraceptives for financial reasons and have faith in a border less community of Muslims? Don't they think this use of force on men and women to act against their religion is vile and wrong?
 
.
Don't forget "sweeter than honey".

Here's an excerpt from the link: "In 2017, Xinjiang revised its Regulations on Population and Family Planning, stipulating that all ethnic groups should implement a unified family planning policy allowing couples in urban areas to have two children, and those in rural areas three."
Which part of mandating the maximum number of children one is supposed to have empowers women? Which part of the much famed "re-education" is supposed to empower women? My intention of posting this was to gauge the reaction of Pakistanis. Of course the nationalists see national interest first and they don't care about this. What about the ones who still care about the principles of Islam to not have contraceptives for financial reasons and have faith in a border less community of Muslims? Don't they think this use of force on men and women to act against their religion is vile and wrong?
Ok they accept their crime, could you accept your crimes in IOK like raping women/abducting adults and children/ torturing them to death etc etcs???
 
.
I did not understand the King Effect at this point but will still reply.

Should the huge historic populations of India and China have been allowed to continue in post World War 2 / post Colonial modern time ?

Russia is the world's largest country in size yet has a population of slightly more than 140 million.



Well, I was just making a point about unsustainability in India and China if its middle class and upper class are allowed to continue their highly consumerist lifestyle.

But yes, your underlined point is correct. Such a thing should be imposed all over the world. I believe when Uber started its service in America its advertisement was that many Americans will no longer need to bring out their vehicles to go somewhere because they can depend on Uber.



Two things struck me from the article :

1. The governments seem to be focusing more though occasionally on sterilization in rural areas when there are also so many economically deprived people in urban areas, living in slums and in pipes, and having more children than they can get them to prosper. But this is also a case of government mis-spending ( on the military, on unnecessary construction projects etc ) and of socio-economic disparity ( Mukesh Ambani's 27-storey "house" ).

2. Many middle class families are still conservative and produce three children as well and push them into middle class poverty, where they will be able to buy consumer items and flats on loan but for years be wage slaves to repay the loans. They will birth children who will repeat the cycle. And they will be culturally conservative as well. Hindus and Muslims alike.
So all in all, burdensome on the planet's ecosystem and societally disharmonious.

---

OK, I am logging-off but you can leave your reply. I will reply tomorrow.
What should and shouldn't have been allowed was the decision of the people of the nations and their government. Not of white saviours who have done "research" to tell everyone about the correct population levels are for each country while they hog disproportionate levels of resources. Population control is good, but ultimately a decision best left to the individual. Past has shown us that population levels rise exponentially as a country develops and plateau off as it becomes fully developed. Are these population levels unsustainable? Possibly, but these doom predictions have been made for decades. Even if it is unsustainable, it's because of America and Europe who have hogged all the resources and not some villager in Nigeria or India who has 5 children and makes less than $5/day. Consumerism might not be sustainable, but humans are resilient. They'll find a way. You said the video talked about countries like Bangladesh and not India and China which are billion plus. I gave the link to explain the India and China are special cases that are often seen in statistics and have the name "king effect". The problems of middle class people who have more children and push themselves into poverty aren't cases of individual ignorance as you suggest, rather they are expected group consequences of a developing country. This is explained in the video. Forcing them to sterilise is counter productive. I consider myself a market socialist, and accept that markets often produce these obscene displays like Ambanis, but markets are still better than communist central management, as the history of China and Vietnam has shown us. The supposed government mismanagement of resources might be a policy failure, but that's not the issue here. These will self correct as time progresses and the government has more experience.
Ok they accept their crime, could you accept your crimes in IOK like raping women/abducting adults and children/ torturing them to death etc etcs???
Of course I could. It's shameful that the government of India under multiple leaderships hasn't apologized for the war crimes committed by the Indian army in multiple areas like the Northeast, the red corridor and Kashmir. India should learn from the Australians who have shown maturity in the case of war crimes and have accepted everything. I hope this failure could be rectified some day and justice is given to the victims.
 
Last edited:
.
oh. no sweatshops in the terrorist training camp? Are you sure? Please stop lying. thank you.

What if there is no sweatshop in the terrorist training camp. Why do U.S. drones bomb you??? Why don't US drones bomb Xinjiang?

BTW, congratulations you still have power. I guess you are using the wind power technology of Xinjiang. Emmm. US also uses Xinjiang wind power technology.

Use China Power Technology and equipment and China base station. And ridicule the Chinese for using VPN... It's 2021. Suicide bombers are still so interesting. And childish. And failure. And no shame...

Why does your country force people to cut off electricity?! Why does your country force people to suffer from severe hunger and malnutrition?! Why does your country support terrorism?! Why is your country poor and backward?!...

。。。。。。。。。。。。。。

I hope some friends can understand it in their spare time. Why your country failed. And how to better develop your country. I Believe. After you reach the economic level of Uighur people. You will understand.

I don't want China to defend the terrorist training camp at UNSC forever. If you're not. Develop yourself better. The whole world thank you. @313ghazi

The whole world thank you.

Looks like a suicide bomber didn't pay you for your services in your nail salon - you seem to be very frustrated. Do you promise to love him long time? If Pakistani are terrorists why are you using VPN to post on our forum? Why are you breaking great perfect CPP law by using VPN? Accessing sites outside great wall is illegal in your country - why are you a criminal?

You countries laws are perfect, every decision your government makes is perfect - so why are you breaking the law to visit PDF?

Suicide bombs are technology, why don't you like that technology? Those people blow them selves up for political beliefs, not kill themselves because they can't get a toilet break in a sweat shop.
 
.
says an immigrant lol
Precisely. I would not have been a immigrant. Neither would you have been a immigrant. Neither million other Pakistani's living in the West if "West" had come to Pakistan instead.

Instead I along with million other Pakistani's or Pakistani's orgin live with the ignominy pf being in the West when we could have had the West at home in Pakistan.
Imagine they had brought this in when your mommy and daddy where younger you my friend would have been flushed down the toilet in your village .
If that what it took for million Pakistani's to have the West at hom,e in Pakistan. So be it.
 
.

Interesting phrasing though. If you think this is okay, imagine if India started to "promote Muslim women's right" using these tactics in Kashmir or even the undisputed areas like UP/Kerala.

Edit: replaced sterilisation with re-education in the title per moderator.


re-education, hahhaha fancy word,in chinese for horror movies

1610132217483.png
 
. .
Economic level of sweat shops where we have to hide from from govt with illegal vpn. Why are you breaking the law to visit this forum? Is CPP wrong for preventing you from accessing this forum?

If your economic condition is so great why are people jumping out of factory windows to die? Is it because Mao stop you smoking the opium? Do you want some good Afghan hash?
Think about a country with a per capita GDP of only 1000 USD discussing China's economic level. Then use Chinese power technology to watch western news. Finally, use Chinese base stations to attack China.

There's no shame in suicide bombers? You are at least 20 years behind Xinjiang!!!

Your literacy rate and life expectancy. Even the industrial level. Even behind the Mao era!

Save your country!
 
.
Now some Iron Brothers are diverting the topic to India. I thought it was well established on PDF that India is a discriminationary shit hole that Pakistan must fight against? I'm not here to defend India lol. The matter on hand is Chinese treatment of Uyghurs, which was vehemently denied by many here but the proof is getting more overwhelming by the second. If this is the way China wants to establish gender equality among the Uyghurs, more power to them. But don't tell this to those who claimed Islam is the most gender equal female rights religion and doesn't need any reform!
Lol... Re educate extremist = bad? Empower Uighur woman more right = sterilization? There is reason why Pakistanis don't response to your story spinning.
 
. . . .
Back
Top Bottom